Dear Mark: Leg Fatigue, Too Much Muscle Meat, Starch Persorption, and Hadza Study Author Responds

Road CyclingFor today’s edition of Dear Mark, we’ve got four questions. First is a question from a reader who exemplifies the “between a rock and a hard place” situation inherent to chronic cardio. Second, I address a reader who worries that I’m not worried enough about exclusive muscle meat consumption. Third, I give my thoughts on whether starch persorption into the blood stream is a real problem for most people and a black mark against resistant starch. And finally, one of the lead authors of the fascinating Hadza gut biome study mentioned in a recent Weekend Link Love clarifies the precision of their sample preservation methods.

Let’s go:


After years of aggressive road cycling, the lone aspect I am struggling with since starting the Primal Blueprint last year is leg fatigue. Granted I am 55, but a very healthy, lean and active 55. I find through repeatable experimentation that heading out on the bike on the normal daily Primal menu results in leg fatigue, but if I carb up the night before and again 2-3 hours before the event, I am just fine, back to my old self. This is how I did it before Primal. Am I missing something? By the way, though, when I do carb up, the muscle inflammation spikes up too, dang it!

Didn’t you mention that you were writing a book on Primal for endurance athletics?



You’ve just stumbled onto the big problem with chronic cardio. In order to stay competitive, maintain the training, and perform like usual during your rides, you need to carb up – usually with the junkiest stuff you can get your paws on. Short term, it feels good. You kill the ride, you improve your time, all is right in the world.

But if you carb up enough to support your massive training load, you may end up suffering from systemic inflammation from all the training and all the sugar. Long term, your body suffers and starts to fall apart at the seams. You’re noticing that yourself.

If you ask me, this is simply more evidence that “aggressive road cycling” isn’t something we should be doing on a regular basis; at least not if your goal is optimal health. To do so requires a suboptimal, inflammatory diet that’s almost as difficult to maintain as the training.

Also, when you go low-carb and start fat and keto-burning, you lose your top end for a while. There may be a lengthy adaptation that’s even lengthier if you’re not strict about it. Carbing up, particularly with non-Primal sources, may extend the adaptation period. If you’re not already, definitely start lifting heavy once a week in the gym, focusing primarily on the lower body. Squats, deadlifts, leg presses, lunges – that sort of thing. Doing heavy maximum output leg training in the gym once a week may help with adaptation and can actually increase the resistance of your muscles to fatigue during training.

There are ways to “carb” up the night before planned hard workouts (and you shouldn’t make every workout hard – maybe just twice a week) that minimize inflammation and maximize usable glycogen. Note the term “usable” that means that you might not need more than 150 grams total to top off muscle glycogen stores, especially since you’re only going to be drawing on (and depleting) leg glycogen on the bike. Fruits are a good way to do that, as are tubers.

Ideally, you just limit this kind of training. At any age but especially yours (and mine), that aggressive riding is hard to maintain and still thrive. Hard long rides for fun? Sure, I might even go for those once a year or so. If you insist (and I know you will because I know the feeling!), there is a better way to do this kind of training, which I’ll be exploring in my upcoming book, Primal Endurance. It’ll be right up your alley.

Dear Mark,

I know you’ve talked a great deal about what we lose out on when we shy away from the fattier cuts. However, I’ve never heard you say anything about the possible hazards of eating too much muscle meat. I think people read about how hunter-gatherers ate so much animal and think “Oh, well I can eat 2 pounds of steak every night” but hunter gatherers would never have eaten that much muscle meat at a time. Is it possible that a lot of the red flags about meat consumption are true and just misunderstood? Is it unhealthy to eat so much meat and so little of the fatty organs?


I completely agree. The only point I contest: I have addressed this in previous posts.

I’ve come up with methods to trick oneself into eating organ meat because I recognize the nutritional importance of eating them.

I even took readers on a visual tour across the edible landscape of an entire animal carcass.

When I analyzed the latest “meat will kill you” study, I wondered if some of the (tenuous and often insubstantial when you correct for unhealthy lifestyles, cooking temperature/method, processed meat intake, etc.) connections between meat intake and early mortality can be explained by our widespread tendency to only consume muscle meat and eschew organs, bones, skin, and gelatinous cuts.

I don’t know that it’s “unhealthy,” but I do think that if you intend to base your diet around animal products, you can’t expect to get the best – or even good – results avoiding 75% of the animal. From Paleolithic hunter-gatherers eating the still pulsating colon packed with fermenting vegetation to grandmothers who’d visit their favorite butcher every Tuesday for bones, oxtails, liver, and shanks, our ancestors both distant and near ate everything. That’s been the normal way to “eat meat” up until a generation or two ago, and I suspect there’s something to it.

Hi Mark,

I’ve been following your posts about resistant starch and my husband and I have both started taking potato starch in the last couple of days.

Then I read this today from a podcast by Ray Peat:

‘Adding butter or cream slows the digestion so it isn’t such a powerful insulin stimulant, but it also reduces the chance of what’s called persorption of starch granules. […] A potato starch granule happens to be very big. Other starches are more the size of a red blood cell, but a potato starch granule is several times fatter than that. But even these huge granules bigger than cells can get squeezed right through the wall of the intestine, enter the lymphatics and the blood system, so within 30 minutes after you eat starch without fat, you see the starch grains circulating through your blood, and if they’re big they’ll plug up your arterioles. Studies in mice showed that a high raw starch diet accelerated their aging. You can demonstrate areas of every organ that were being killed by plugging up the arteries.’

It freaked me out a bit and I’m wondering if this is true. I’ve always found your posts to be well researched and I trust your opinion. Is this something we should be concerned about?



I like reading Ray Peat’s stuff, you know, I really do, but I think he fixates on the minutiae way too much, often using obscure animal research and extreme conditions to support his positions.

Persorption of starch occurs, but it’s totally normal. It happens with any starch, not just raw starch, and humans clear any persorbed starch from the blood within a couple hours. In infants, it’s probably a feature rather than a flaw: human milk oligosaccharides, normally valued only for their prebiotic qualities, get into the bloodstream to mop up and clear pathogens while the immune system is still in its, ahem, infancy.

Persorption may be increased in cases of leaky gut, but what’s ironic (if you take the view that persorption is evil) is that the butyrate produced as a result of consuming resistant starch and other prebiotics lowers intestinal permeability. So if anything, eating more raw potato starch will reduce problematic amounts of persorption.

This is where taking a step back from the minutiae to look at the big, evolutionary picture can help. We can argue about how much starch humans have historically eaten, but everyone agrees that we have eaten starch for tens of thousands of years. Some cultures have eaten more than others. Many seemingly healthy cultures eat a fair amount of starch. There are problems with starch (over)consumption, especially in the modern sedentary inflamed population, but I don’t think persorption of starch granules into the bloodstream is one of the major ones.

In the end, you have to weigh your options. Do you continue taking potato starch for the direct, observed, experienced, empirical benefits to digestion, sleep, gut health, and metabolism? Or do you hang your hat on a theoretical problem, on the off-chance that persorption of starch into the bloodstream is slowly, inexorably, silently killing you? I know what I’d choose.

Dear Mark,

First, I’ve been a long time reader of your site, have met you in person, and greatly admire the effort you put in to educating the community about how to achieve personal health and wellness. In the last couple of years, I’ve only managed time to read the link love days, which are very useful for me to see what kind of news aggregates on your radar. This week I am honored that one of those news pieces you linked is to the study that I and my colleagues recently published on the Hadza gut microbiome. Thank you for promoting further interest in this field of research and in our work.

I wanted to say, though, that while I support healthy discourse in science and think it is fair to offer the conclusions with the criticisms, in our case I am concerned about the emphasis on the criticism by Rob Knight that our results may be not valid due to the ethanol/silica storage procedure, and that the soon to be media zeitgeist on our work may be ultimately dismissive of our contribution. And this because of a comment wrought out of conflicting interests (Rob Knight works with Jeff Leach on their own Hadza microbiome study). Instead, I would like to encourage anyone with criticisms to read our methods in which we of course took measures to ensure this protocol would not invalidate our results. We first validated the method by sequencing and amplifying test samples both frozen and dried (ethanol) and obtained comparable results.

So, I suppose what I am saying is that while criticisms are welcome and a natural process of science, it is not helpful and instead harmful to give platform to unfounded criticisms that have already been thoroughly addressed in our original methodology and reporting. The paper is completely open access and I welcome any and all people to read it for themselves!

Gut microbiome of the Hadza hunter-gatherers

All the best,


I appreciate the email. From what I can tell from reading your methods and your explanation of the issue, you took all necessary precautions to ensure the validity of your results was not compromised. It seems that the Hadza do indeed throw into disarray our previously conceived notions of what constitutes a universally healthy gut biome.

Great work, Stephanie, and thanks for bringing that to our attention. Please do it again whenever something seems amiss!

Thanks for reading, everyone. Be sure to keep the questions coming and I’ll do my best to answer them.

Primal Kitchen Buffalo

About the Author

Mark Sisson is the founder of Mark’s Daily Apple, godfather to the Primal food and lifestyle movement, and the New York Times bestselling author of The Keto Reset Diet. His latest book is Keto for Life, where he discusses how he combines the keto diet with a Primal lifestyle for optimal health and longevity. Mark is the author of numerous other books as well, including The Primal Blueprint, which was credited with turbocharging the growth of the primal/paleo movement back in 2009. After spending three decades researching and educating folks on why food is the key component to achieving and maintaining optimal wellness, Mark launched Primal Kitchen, a real-food company that creates Primal/paleo, keto, and Whole30-friendly kitchen staples.

If you'd like to add an avatar to all of your comments click here!

43 thoughts on “Dear Mark: Leg Fatigue, Too Much Muscle Meat, Starch Persorption, and Hadza Study Author Responds”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. That link at the end of Stephanie’s comment leads back to this page, not to her study.

  2. I’m finding potato starch so interesting. It hasn’t helped with sleep yet but I’m still hopeful. I did have some grocery store sushi a few days ago and took my blood sugar readings. I was amazed that I didn’t really get any spike. I still find it hard to wrap my head around though.

    1. I agree with you Tamara, I bought some, took some, eat sushi here and there and try to figure out if there is much of a change in sleep, digestion, “body music” etc. So far the best sleep is when I have my homemade potato salad just before bed. I make it with Bubbie’s pickles so there’s a bit of probiotic in there too. However, that may have just been a good night for me….. who knows. I do note there is a LOT more “body music” with the potato starch than there is with the real food RS.
      I also looked at my tongue and found a big valley in the middle and along the sides little valleys…… I have read that’s not a good sign, don’t know how to find out what that means and how to correct it but maybe someone here will mention it and enlighten me. Oh, and I LOVE your website, wish I lived in New Orleans. 🙂

  3. “I think he fixates on the minutiae way too much”

    I find this to be true of a lot of nutrition stuff. Too many people try to use logic to make health decisions, extrapolating the science with their own linear thinking process. If a little bit does this then it’s a catastrophe! Rather than seeing that the body is a system of balancing processes that step in to protect you from going too far in this or that direction. That’s why I like your basic primal blueprint. It’s so lacking in the minutiae and is simple. Simple works pretty darn well.

    1. Yeah, same here – and I am glad that Mark is addressing that. The Forums are especially full of this kind of obsessing over minutiae. The way I interpret the Primal blueprint is “eat real food, get good sleep, move around, lift heavy, get some sunshine, enjoy life, and the minutiae will take care of themselves”.

      I don’t think that Grok had a degree in biochemistry.

      1. Agreed. Also look at yesterdays Link Love and read about Vitamin J…As in Joy!

  4. You bring up interesting points on chronic endurance. I’ve read elsewhere the dangers of causing chronic inflammation by doing frequent cardio. I think it’s telling that runners come down with heart and lung problems later in life yet running is considered a healthy activity.

    One of the more satisfying exercises I’ve done recently was a long hike with the family. By the end of the day we were exhausted, but happy. Made me realize that there is something truly primal to long hikes. I think it keys into something deep in our being.

    1. I think it’s telling that runners come down with heart and lung problems later in life yet running is considered a healthy activity.

      Like Jim Fixx and Bill Clinton? Jim was found on the side of the road dead, still in his running gear.

      1. About Jim Fixx– true–but before he took up running he smokes and ate the SAD and drank like a fish. His arteries were hardened befoe he began running, and when he ran he didn’t change his diet ( high carbs) much.

        So you could say the running may have given him maybe 10 years of active life versus an even earlier death by remaining with his previous lifestyle.

        I am not defending his ideas on running– I used to do 10K races and run 40-50 miles a week and think I was in good shape. But now I sprint twice a week, walk 3-4 miles a day and get a variety of other exercise and play.

        I had a heart scan done recently and the doctor said I have some calcification of the arteries (moderate). He wanted to get me on statins. I did some research and realized that since I went primal some years ago– my arteries may not have calcified much if at all– it might be a baseline for someone my age (63). Before you think I am an old fart– I am just a kid in my mind (19) and still have my old talk radio persona (except when I preach on Sundays!

        I guess what really is telling is diet and exercise– properly done starting at an earlier age– is likely to give you the maximum benefit.

        BTW- Bill Clinton cheated on more than Hillary— His diet behind the closed doors at the White House consisted of some stuff that would clog your ateries just reading the menu.

        1. Yep, Bill Clinton was big on burgers and he loved unhealthy foods until he had his heart problems and decided to eat better.

      2. Gotta love the “Running makes your heart explode!” – anecdotes – no confounding factors there at all, no siree…

        1. Dr James O’Keefe MD is a cardiologist. In this video he gives a good lecture on excessive cardio and heart issues later in life. I know someone who trained for half marathons. He now has a pacemaker and his cardiologist said is was do to his “chronic cardio”

        2. Scott,
          there isn`t really much substance to O`Keefe`s hypotheses at this point; have a look at the article by Alex Hutchinson I recommended below.

    2. Ahh yeah, those horrible, oft-cited “dangers of causing chronic inflammation by doing frequent cardio”…the only problem is, studies actually demonstrate no such thing – as long as overtraining is avoided, of course, as doing too much can attenuate or even reverse the benefits of pretty much any mode of exercise. Were one to apply the reasoning behind the “chronic cardio” concept across the board, people would have to be scared away from recreational strength training, too – with a reference to the massive joint problems of middle-aged professional powerlifters. Ironically, Mark himself conceded this a while ago in a post on “The Relationship between Exercise and Inflammation,” wherein he cited several studies on the topic – among them one that demonstrated reduced CRP-levels as a result of combined marathon (!) and resistance training in young, healthy females – ; the “bottom line” of the post was that while “chronic exercise” in general is bad, Mark believes that “cardio” is the easiest to overdo, which is why the dangers of “chronic cardio” should be emphasized specifically. I tend to think that the latter is more personal experience/bias than actual fact; after all, both recreational runners and professional endurance athletes live longer than “Average Joe/Jane,” whereas the evidence is mixed for combined/anaerobic sports.

      1. “…evidence is mixed for combined/anaerobic sports.” (Needless to say, there are probably confounding factors at play, though.)

        PS: “Will Running Too Much Kill You? – The annual look at the current state of the evidence.” by Alex Hutchinson is a fairly decent summary on the topic.

  5. I can relate to David’s issue regarding competitive cycling on low carb diet. I’m am medical doctor and avid cyclist trying to work this stuff out.

    As I understand it, ketoadaption allows for minimal glucose utilization during aerobic exercise. But, albeit less, glucose is still required by brain. I have been experimenting on 3-4 hour rides and races, finding significant value in 1) maintaining low carb, high fat diet and eating big breakfast 2 hours prior to ride/race (ie not carb loading), 2) using superstarch prior to ride (3 scoops) and during a ride after 3 hours (1 additional scoop per additional hour), 3) eating some nuts during ride to satisfy empty stomach “feeling” and 4) having a sugar source (a gel) ready in case anaerobic effort anticipated at end.

    Superstarch is available from company called UCan and was designed to allow for very slow carb absorption (in patients with glycogen storage diseases), thereby raising blood glucose levels enough to satisfy minimal ketoadapted brain requirement (avoiding “bonk”) but not high enough to stimulate insulin to the level of inhibiting fat metabolism. So, theoretically, you don’t bonk and still maintain access to large reservoir of fat fuel stores.

    I have found my mental clarity during race/ride remains higher than previously and I avoid the post race GI issues associated with eating all those gooey sugary products.

    So far, so good. My riding is improved and I feel better after big efforts. But still playing around with it.

    And, as I’ve learned through observation, everybody is different and a lot of self experimentation is required.

    1. I agree with you. I rode end to end (in UK, 1,000 miles in 9 days) staying Primal, I didn’t carb load, I used rehydration salts in my water bottle. I ate nuts and some dried fruits on the bike (8 odd hours a day), and survived much better than the rest of the bunch I rode with (at the pitstops I stripped out the salad and protein from the bread rolls and ate that and sometimes had an apple! I estimate I had perhaps 200 g of carb total daily which given I was riding more than 100 miles a day over some monster hills I consider low carb!

    2. Agree. As I read David’s question, I could completely relate, as I’m an avid (very low carb) cyclist. And I happen to be 55 also – a “healthy, lean, active” 55 yo woman. I was going to suggest SuperStarch – which I use – but others beat me to it. I love SS – for all the reasons MJM states. I can do high miles (80+) with plenty of climbing on a VLC b’fast, a dose of SS before, and a dose in the middle, and feel GREAT at the end. I eat NOTHING while on the bike. Granted, I’m not a racer and I don’t care about going super-fast, but I live in CO, and do climb – at elevation – and do club rides, etc. I’m not just toodling along on the paths! (If I were racing – i.e., going anaerobic a lot – I’d def figure out a way to throw in some carbs)

      Doesn’t do much good to tell cycling junkies not to ride so much, does it? This is something I’ve struggled with, too. Is it “chronic cardio?” I guess so, but I get so much else from it, I’ll cycle til I die. Actually, it would be an awesome way to go…. ;o)

      Interesting advice to do leg work in the weight room. I do strength training, but concentrate on core & upper body, figuring I get enough of a leg workout on the bike. Might have to re-visit that.

      Try SuperStarch, David. Seems to work well for a few of us here….

      With that said, I’m out for a climb! Windy today – gotta head for the hills.

  6. Peter Attia, an endurance athlete who follows a ketogenic diet, recommends Super Starch, ( ), a relatively new training aid that apparently provides the energy boost of carbohydrate without the insulin spike. I have not tried it, but Dr. Attia has been using it for quite some time and swears by it.

  7. I think it’s telling that runners come down with heart and lung problems later in life yet running is considered a healthy activity.

    Like Jim Fixx and Bill Clinton? Jim was found on the side of the road dead, still in his running gear.

    Do you have evidence or this??
    More likely diet related in both cases. There is no evidence that I know of that shows runners have more heart and lung problems as they age. Anything I have seen shows just the opposite for endurance athletes.
    There are a few reported cases such as Fixx and Clinton but in Fixx’s case he lived longer (and healthlier) than almost any other male in his family so one could argue the running extended his life. Fixx BTW apparently ate a high fat diet – lots of bacon and eggs :-). Not sure what his oil and carb intake was like.

    1. My husband has been doing endurance cycling for many many years & is very competitive. His best friend (also an endurance cyclist) died a few years ago suddenly of a heart attack, not knowing he had any heart problems.

      My husband had never had any heart problems & has no members of his family with heart problems. He has a computer programme so that he can monitor his training & it comes with a heart rate monitor. Anyway, one day he noticed that the heart rate monitor had shot right up, so he just assumed that it had gone wrong (even though he was feeling unusually breathless!) He tried again & with the same result. He still thought that the monitor had gone wrong, so he borrowed someone else’s & got the same result. I kept telling him that as he was feeling breathless at the same time as the monitor was going up, then it was more likely he had a problem than the monitor gone wrong! He found it really hard to believe though, as he thought he was super fit & healthy due to all the cycling he did. He does also go to the gym to do weight lifting about once a week. Anyway it turned out that he had an arrhythmia & was given shock treatment to correct it. He now takes tablets to keep it in check, but still continues to cycle as hard as ever!

      Recently another friend (also an endurance cyclist) died suddenly of a heart attack when they didn’t know they had any heart problems. That could have been my husband if he had not used a heart rate monitor.

      I have heard of many endurance cyclists having heart problems, so I do think there is a connection there, but also they are so addicted to the cycling that they wouldn’t give it up despite knowing the risks!

      1. You are probably on to something here, but suffering from tunnel vision with regard to your interpretation: True, endurance athletes are at a greater risk of developing atrial fibrillation than “Average Joe/Jane,” but the same goes for pretty much any sport that isn`t exclusively anaerobic (ATP-CP system-dependent, to be more specific) – and that encompasses most sports: Seeing as people exclusively practising to improve their shot putting/javelin throwing/olympic weightlifting skills are a tiny minority among recreational athletes, pretty much everyone who exercises vigorously “for fun” with regularity has to accept a higher AF risk as a side effect; the higher your accumulated lifetime vigorous physical activity, the higher that risk will be. Those who exclusively exercise “moderately” are “off the hook,” though – their risk of developing AF is actually lower than average. So – someone who goes for a slow, short jog a couple of times a week is likely to have a lower AF risk than your average 3x weekly Crossfitter – maybe it`s time to warn people about “Chronic Crossfit,” too…
        Additionally, endurance exercise – and “vigorous exercise” in general – has numerous documented benefits that counterbalance its negative effects on the electrophysiology of the heart, which is why its net effect appears to be a reduction and not an increase of all-cause mortality risk – consequently, both recreational joggers and serious endurance athletes alike live longer than non-running controls, on average (this holds up even when one corrects for confounding factors as best one can).

  8. I would definitely buy a PB cookbook devoted entirely to offal.

  9. Generally runners do not run for health reasons, they run because they enjoy running. Swimmer swim because they enjoy swimming, cyclists pedal because they enjoy cycling.

    There’s more to life than living to be 102 years old.

    1. I dunno – if chronic endurance exercise actually reduces lifespan and healthiness, people need to know about it. Yes, there’s more to life than living to be 102, but if you think you’re doing a good thing for your body and actually are damaging it instead, you should know it.

      And lots of people believe they’re doing something healthy by chronic cardio, even if they don’t enjoy it. I tried running for a while and hated it – but did it because I thought I had to. Luckily I didn’t stick with it for too long.

      1. The thing is, “chronic endurance exercise” actually doesn`t seem to “reduce lifespan” – the available data suggest the opposite, in fact…(observational data corrected for confounding factors, as RCTs on this question are pretty much impossible, for obvious reasons..)

  10. David’s chronic leg fatigue sounds like overtraining, likely caused by inadequate recovery to me. Inadequate recovery in this case may not be due to inadequate rest or training too hard, but instead on a lack of restoration of muscle and liver glycogen lost as a result of intense effort. Mark alludes to this.

    You don’t need to go completely non-primal/paleo or buy a bunch of supplements and goos to get by. Focus on primal/paleo foods outside your training window. Fruit with a little protein beforehand works to get me through 60-90 minute intense interval rides on just water. Immediately after, make your own psuedo-paleo/primal recovery drink (or go commercial if you must) with fruit juice, whole fruit, and protein powder. Add a tuber or some dried fruit to the next meal and you’re set. Once you’re into 3 and 4 hour rides, then you will likely need sugar unless you’re spinning at a very low intensity. In any event, being primal/paleo outside the training window will have you better off than Team Barilla co-sponsored by Chef Boyardee.

    Look forward to Mark’s book!

  11. I’m about to start training for a 2 day 120km cycling ride that we do for a cancer fundraiser in the summer. We are supposed to do long rides, increasing distance weekly, to get our butt used to the sitting and of course build our endurance on the bike. But what I’m wondering is: Do the sprint runs that I LOVE to do help to build the kind of endurance we will need for a cycling event of this type (there are some steep inclines). If so, I will, lessen the cycling training km’s, keep up the sprint runs, weight training (can’t give it up, sorry!) and just sit my tush on the bike stationary and read…”MDA” of course. lol Thoughts anyone??

  12. I just started my daily read of certain sites. I opened Seth’s Blog site and was informed that Seth had died while hiking on Saturday. Just thought you’d like to know….

  13. For me, Ray Peat underscores some ideas that are often confused;

    1. There are broad, underlying principles that are applicable to virtually everyone (populations).

    2. There are a ton of micro-tweaks that are appropriate for individual circumstances (including activity level, pre-existing conditions, particular sensitivities etc).

    I have no doubt that Ray Peat is exactly right for himself, I’m just not sure that Ray Peat can be extrapolated out to populations.

    So the common mistakes are;

    1. Dismissing the notion that there are things virtually everyone in a population should be doing (there will always be very few individual exceptions). In other words, the mistake of using “individuality” as an excuse to continue to fail.

    2. Identifying an extremely specific individual regimen that is perfect for SOMONE ELSE, and trying to incorporate that to derive those individual benefits for yourself.

  14. Excess red muscle meat increases Iron. Excess iron over a certain amount contributes to insulin resistance in the liver believe it or not! It’s great to give blood to lower your levels, especially if you don’t exercise as much and aren’t having a lot of tissue overturn. I think they suggest less than 100 on the iron scale so give blood as a male. Women are protected due to their period cycles. Lucky them. Not an issue in hunter gatherers, but maybe they have more parasites and blood loss in various ways.

  15. The muscle meat issue is close to my heart. I live in China, and the food sources around me are very toxic. Vegetables are utterly unsafe-since we stopped eating them about 18 months ago we’ve felt much better. Every time my roommmate has them now she breaks out and itches everywhere; even the so-called “organic” ones, which even corrupt gov testing admits 30% of are fake. If we eat out, even at the nicest restaurants, we get boils a few days later and feel awful. We’re able to get pastured chicken eggs, which we eat raw, pastured pork bacon and grass-fed beef and lamb imported from Australia. BUT, we can only get muscle meat. Some of it comes with bones, which we always make broth from. But there are no organs available, and the beef is particularly low in fat. I tend to grind the beef myself so I’m eating all the fat that it does have, but it’s still pretty low fat. Local organ meat is available, but it is desperately unsafe. (Poisoning is the #1 cause of death here, from food). Kerrygold butter is available, imported coconut oil and milk, clean cocoa high in flavinoids, macadamia nuts, pecans, full-fat plain Greek yogurt, olive oil, goat cheese and occasional real maple syrup and coconut sugar make up the rest of our diet. A little imported fruit is available–the occasional lemon and whatever fruit is in season at the time. But without access to any organ meat I worry about our diet. Nothing else to be done, though, as far as I can tell.

  16. Yesterday I actually saw someone with a knee brace on BOTH legs, some sort of back support device, and who knows WHAT on her hips (never seen anything like it but it looked painful). And she was running her ass off (we’re def talking about 70% or over max heart rate here). And her running technique was horrible, HORRIBLE. Probably the source of half of her problems.

    I didn’t know what to think. Was she following her docs “advice” to get more physical activity? Was she doing more harm than good here? Seriously though, when is enough, enough? When have you crossed the threshold from benefits to negatives? I couldn’t help but think Maek could have done a lot of good for her by teaching her to lift a few heavy things every now and then.

  17. I don’t believe the inner organs make up 75% of the meat on the animal. Inner organs make up 12% on body weight of the human for example. I don’t believe there’s much to the muscle meat is inflammatory theory, muscle meat has all the amino acids you need. The type of meats I do believe are inflammatory are processed meats, lunch meats, sausages, frozen burgers, all that stuff with nasty preservatives and other additives

  18. I’m gone to tell my little brother, that he should also visit this webpage on regular basis to get updated from most up-to-date gossip.