Marks Daily Apple
Serving up health and fitness insights (daily, of course) with a side of irreverence.
13 Mar

Why Humans Like Taking the Easy Way Out

Easy Way or the Hard WayWe fetishize hard work a bit, don’t we?

Toil, endless toil; gritty determination in the face of adversity; and ceaseless, relationship-rending labor are virtues to be praised. We applaud each other for working late, snicker at those who don’t, and measure our self-worth in timestamps. Meanwhile, those who “take the easy way out” are ridiculed and lambasted and passed over for promotions. Googling the term returns pages and pages of blogs explaining how to kick the habit of taking it easy. By all accounts, taking the easy way out seems harmful and counterproductive to our survival in this world. Why, then, do so many of us seem drawn to the path of least resistance? If “the hard route” leads to riches, why isn’t seeking it hard-wired in us all? Why do we tend to look for the easy way out of a situation?

Well, it’s just easier that way, for one. Physics says that the path of least resistance is generally the one taken.

Think about the evolutionary context, too – the context(s) under which we lived, evolved, adapted, and figured out how to survive. Like any other animal living in nature, we had to conserve energy when we could, because a grocery store wasn’t always right around the corner. We liked shortcuts, because those were more efficient and they used less energy and fewer resources. Toolmaking? Tools make tasks easier. An average 4-hour workday with plenty of downtime for leisure activities? That’s the easy way out. Persistence hunting? Easy way out. It just so happens that in the ancestral context, the “easy way” worked. Using persistence hunting as an example, this allowed hunters to bag an animal without burning through all their glycogen and electrolyte stores. Whereas attempting to run the animal down at a blistering-5 minute mile marathon pace would lead to pulled muscles, strained ligaments, exhausted glycogen stores, dehydration, and near-certain failure, the “easy way out” was also the most effective way forward.

Today, the situation is different. You’re not going to die (today) because you overextended yourself at work. You might be stressed out and sleep-deprived, but you’ll still have that car waiting in the garage to take you home to your refrigerator full of food and warm bed. You can overextend yourself and reap great financial rewards with minimal immediate risk to your personal safety. Survival is no longer about digging up some tubers, killing game, finding water, and avoiding the elements. Most of us have to figure out ways to obtain the slips of paper that are redeemable for goods and services, and that can take some hard, weird work. We’re paying for college tuitions, housing, transportation, smartphone data plans, vacations.

Population dynamics have changed, too. No longer are we drawing upon fertile, untouched grounds teeming with edible life and resources without much competition from others. Now we’re applying for jobs with hundreds of other applicants, or trying to make our products/businesses stand out amidst the burgeoning crowd. We stand alone as individuals against everyone else (or at least it can feel like that). The easy way out doesn’t work quite as well as it once did.

Yet the urge remains in many of us. I can relate. I grew up taking the easy way out as often as I could. Instead of walking to school, I ran. It was faster, it was more enjoyable, and it was just easier than trudging along. I’d take short cuts through wooded areas, again because it was faster, more enjoyable, and easier. When figuring out what sport to take up, I chose the easier route. Instead of working on my handle, lateral quickness, outside shot, and passing ability to overcome my size and excel at basketball, I went with cross country because it was something I was already good at. This continued in college and, really, throughout my life. I’d often choose to run fifteen miles to prep for a race instead of study extra hard for the exam because, well, running was “easier.” I coasted through with solid B’s because, well, it was good enough for what I wanted to do and because I had decided to postpone med school. All these shortcuts made sense to me, and they worked for me.

Later, when I realized that my training schedule was impeding my health and that I could improve my physique and overall fitness with less training and less endurance work, I jumped on it. I made my short, hard workouts shorter and more intense and my long, easy workouts longer and easier. Lifting weights was hard work, but packing it in to a smaller time frame somehow felt easier. Going for runs or cycling at a moderately high intensity for upwards of an hour was hard and fairly unpleasant, while extending the time and reducing the intensity was more enjoyable. It became a hike, a leisure activity. I was taking the easy way out with my workouts and getting better results.

I even designed my entire eating philosophy around taking the path of least resistancespontaneous reduction in hunger instead of calorie counting, food quality instead of quantity, avoiding the problematic foods instead of soaking/sprouting/fermenting to make them less problematic – to get the best results. So there’s definitely still a place for taking the easy way out.

It’s really only in the business world that I’ve opted not to take the easy way out. I’ve had to put in the time, the hours, the grunt work to really excel and help build the Primal community from the ground up. Even though this venture has been a huge success, there are also drawbacks. I don’t have as much free time as I might prefer. I have to deal with ample amounts of stress. Even then, my decision to take the hard route and build this business was ultimately about improving my quality of life (and that of others, I hope!) and making it easier to do what I wanted to do.

And that’s the thing: sometimes shortcuts work, sometimes they fall short. Sometimes it makes sense to take the easy way, sometimes it doesn’t. Being drawn to the easy route isn’t a fault, it’s a built-in feature from long ago that doesn’t always work so well today. It doesn’t make us weak, though, and it’s not always a mistake to listen to that urge. You just have to be selective in choosing when and where to listen depending on the situation.

Overall, I think our preference for the easy route is a good thing, because it leads to shortcuts and improved efficiency – even if we have to work really hard for awhile to get there. So while the guys at the startup putting in 20 hour days are absolutely not taking the easy way out, their ultimate goal is to streamline the business so that things are easier and more efficient later. The woman who walks an hour every day instead of driving everywhere isn’t taking the easy route, but in forty years she’ll be the one playing with her grandkids, walking up stairs without an issue, and having an overall easier life than the person who opted to drive everywhere and never exercise. In the grand scheme of things, all these people who worked hard did so to relax and enjoy things later on.

We all want to take the easy route, even if we have to take a more difficult, roundabout way to get there.

As long as you’re aware of the evolutionary underpinnings of our urge to take the easy way out and selective in your response to that urge, you should be okay. Work hard and take risks where appropriate, take shortcuts when they work without shortchanging the final result. At any rate, blanket statements like “avoid the easy way out” aren’t very helpful, and they can even get you into trouble.

What about you? How have you taken the easy way out in life? When has it ruined you? When has it paid off?

You want comments? We got comments:

Imagine you’re George Clooney. Take a moment to admire your grooming and wit. Okay, now imagine someone walks up to you and asks, “What’s your name?” You say, “I’m George Clooney.” Or maybe you say, “I’m the Clooninator!” You don’t say “I’m George of George Clooney Sells Movies Blog” and you certainly don’t say, “I’m Clooney Weight Loss Plan”. So while spam is technically meat, it ain’t anywhere near Primal. Please nickname yourself something your friends would call you.

  1. Mark,

    The “easy way” has typically been the “best way” as it has lead me to areas where I have aptitude – the tough part has been pursing things I suck at when I deem them valuable/useful.


    Tim wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • That’s very insightful, Tim. So true.

      Alison Golden wrote on March 13th, 2013
      • Dr. Ajay Kumar did his doctorate in Medicine from the prestigious All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. He did his residencey in physical medicine and rehabiliatation at Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia .

        PainManagement wrote on March 26th, 2013
    • Very very poignant. There’s definitely something to be said about true growth arising from struggling and adversity… And putting your self in new and uncomfortable and non easy situations

      Bjjcaveman wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • Too true. I’ve noticed a similarity with the way I train – when I get tired, I get more efficient because it’s just easier to move that way.

      Nelly wrote on March 13th, 2013
  2. The easy way is usually the smartest way–no junk to slow you down. You’re working with your head more than your hands…or so it appears.

    Wenchypoo wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • Wenchypoo

      Totally agree Allison.

      Some people like taking the hard way just because they seem to feel some kind of pride in working hard and getting what they want from it.

      … As far as I’m concerned, there’s usually a faster way, and it involves using your brain.

      My country (USA) is so into hard work, struggle, and achievement that no one seems to know anything about quality of life.

      It’s tough to fight the status quo !

      Alexander wrote on March 13th, 2013
      • It’s very cultural. Reminds me of a scene in “Eat pray, love” where the Italians are discussing the art of doing nothing. He says, you Americans you work hard all week, work until you suffer burnout and need to have a holiday, and say “I’m going to have a beer, because I worked hard and I deserve it.
        Italians (or so the author would have us believe) know they deserve it inherently. They don’t need to flog themselves at work to earn enjoyment.
        I’ve noticed Australia taking a more Americanised view. I’m not a fan of this shift!! :-)

        Jane wrote on March 13th, 2013
        • Very true, I moved to Australia over ten years ago and love it whole heartedly, but have noticed a shift. Its becoming more like the negative country we left behind but with better weather and cleaner streets. It used to be about playing cricket on the weekend and taking your kids to the beach. It was about quality of life, not about working so hard to achieve the right status and then wasting time and money at Westfield.

          sally wrote on March 13th, 2013
        • It also depends where you are. I live in rural Australia, and although we don’t rely on the land for an income, there is a different pace than that of the big centres. We notice the seasons, which govern the production of our little farm, we walk with the sheep rather than push them fast. Although we have to drive long distances to get anywhere its not through frenetic traffic snarls. Context. :)

          Heather wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • A friend of mine likes to tell me about his mentor from his younger years, an old apache warrior. He always told him to be “properly lazy.” I.e. use your wit to make the job easier, but always do the job. It’s all about the quality of your actions, not the quantity.

      Sarah wrote on March 22nd, 2013
  3. I often think about this very thing in the context of food and getting people to eat better. As a nutrition educator, it is easy for me to tell people to eat more vegetables, eat fresh meats, etc. but I also realize that people are busy & stressed, and it is a whole lot easier to feed your family by throwing a frozen pizza in the oven or by microwaving convenience foods. It is frustrating, because I feel that our American way-of-life for the typical working adult works against eating right, beacuse that does take some extra time and effort atht not all of us are willing to put in… because it is not seen as easy.

    Lora wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • Try Jamie Oliver’s 30 minute and 15 minute meals. They are easily adaptable to primal ways, and I just don’t look at the pasta ones, but they are full of flavour and written so they can be put together really quickly, with heaps of flavour. I often suggest them to friends when they simply resist at every turn :)

      Heather wrote on March 13th, 2013
      • Good idea, I will look at those! Thank you :)

        Lora wrote on March 14th, 2013
  4. The path of least resistance leads nowhere. By the time you’re old enough to believe it, you find yourself “nowhere”.

    Groktimus Primal wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • yes, let us face reality, in our capitalist society sloth is heresy – those whom envision and pursue the comfort option may likely live in a day-dream and ultimately awaken in a nightmare. Aggression, conflict, and subjugation of the lesser by the greater is integral to successful survival. We best become primal warriors and thereby embrace adversity as opportunity

      Brett wrote on March 13th, 2013
      • True, but those who pursue money and career above everything else may also reach a point where they awaken in a nightmare. Their health is gone, their relationship with their spouse is gone, and they didn’t see their kids grow up.

        So you have to take a balance. Yes, work is important – but remember that you don’t live to work. You work to live.

        No tombstone ever says “I wish I’d spent more time at the office” :)

        kraut wrote on March 13th, 2013
        • amen, kraut.

          Caitlin wrote on March 14th, 2013
        • I think, too often, we evaluate ourselves based on a product (what we produce), rather than on what impact we can have in the world and in the lives of those we cross paths with. In my life, anytime I place my value on my “product,” I find that the next “product” has to be better. I end up “striving” instead of living.

          David wrote on March 20th, 2013
  5. I really enjoyed this post, Mark. It really resonated with me – I’ve got a fairly mind-numbing job in retail right now, because, the economy being what it is, I had to take what I could get, despite being qualified for more stimulating jobs. And yet, I come home from a full-time job and sit down to do several hours of job applications each week, because, although it’s extra work now, it’s the easiest thing in the big picture. Honestly, I don’t know how I’d manage without the other aspects of my life dialed in Primal-style (sleep, nutrition, etc.). Even taking the job I currently have was an “easiest way out” in the sense that yes, it uses up a lot of the time I could be out there doing applications and interviews, but I’d rather do a longer job search with the security of a little income than slog through it in a constant state of “how on earth will I pay my bills?” It’s so important to look at the bigger picture in evaluating what’s easier, what’s better, and so on. And not forget to take a break now and then.

    primitiverenaissance wrote on March 13th, 2013
  6. Posts like this are what keeps me convinced that Mark Sisson is a credible source of information, and his opinion is worth always worth considering. Love it.

    goneprimal wrote on March 13th, 2013
  7. Well this post is one of the best by far that was almost entireliy applicable to me. I guess a lot of people share my opinion on this, as all of us seem to do little tweaks on our (any) plans to get good results while lowering the cost of it, hence increasing efficiency. I for one think that we should commend the one that acheves better results with least ressistance, not the one who toils incessasntly.

    Mustafa wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • In Japan, for several decades, the workers all take periodic daily exercise breaks to do wind mills, jumping jacks etc. It does take away time on the clock, but in balamce, it energizes, destresses them & oxygenates their bodies. They are sick less, more productive and happier.

      Also when one walks away from a problem or a project for a short time, to do or think about something else, it relaxes and recharges the mind to think of possible solutions along different/newer pathways. I vacilate between being a great slacker and a workaholic. It works for me.

      Betorq wrote on March 13th, 2013
  8. My favourite quote of mine is

    – “When people say my way is to good to be true, I answer that theirs is too bad to be the only one possible”

    primal_alex wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • That is such an epic quote. I’m definitely saving that to my long-term memory bank!

      Danny Lennon wrote on March 13th, 2013
  9. I’ve been taking it way easier on myself than ever before, just in the past 2 months. I eat and prepare simple foods (strict paleo is remarkably easy- meat and vegetation… easy), and practice yoga and belly dancing, both gently- no pushing my body at all. I haul heavy, wet, hardwood once or twice/week, and climb a lot of stairs. I am recovering from thyroid and adrenal exhaustion. Anyway, my waist has reduced 5″ in two months, by slowing my whole life down, releasing stress and removing strains on my well-being.

    Taking it easy for me is the key to healing and becoming wholistically healthy. I have been eating strict paleo for 2.5 years. The last two months have been more positively impacting than the whole 2.5 yrs of just diet and exercise. I had to slow down, end stressful patterns/behaviours and relationships, and now I am seeing the benefits of an evolutionary diet. Finally!

    Imogen wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • That is an interesting and insightful story! Especially your point that after 2.5 years, it was adding in the other primal lifestyle aspects that really changed things for you.

      For most of the “super amateur athletes” I know, the ‘slow down’ part of primal philosophy is an absolute non-starter. They’re totally wedded to harder and harder workouts as the ONLY way (plus many say “I could never give up bread!”). My husband was one of those; he went primal after reading Mark’s books first and then so many of the rest out there, and he has totally changed his athletic training. The point now is to be strong enough to enjoy the play, not always working yourself to the ragged edge. I haven’t seen a younger looking 55 year old anywhere!

      KitC wrote on March 13th, 2013
  10. I don’t think shortcuts are the same thing as the easy way out.

    Samantha Moore wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • A physical short cut, as in on a trail, is usually steeper. Very rarely is the shorter trail also physically easier.

      Amy wrote on March 13th, 2013
      • If it were, it would already be the main trail. 😀

        Piper A R wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • Shortcuts sometimes may be very helpful as the easy way out from any situation.

      Dana wrote on March 14th, 2013
  11. My whole issue with this, and primal in general, is that it seems to be a “make it up as we go” philosophy. The images of a grok holding a spear don’t exactly have any of us going out and killing our dinner with a spear. Wouldn’t that be the way to do it?

    In fact, if there were any real enlightenment or evolution here, then why woud we eat meat at all? We have alternatives. Instead we contribute to the perpetual suffering and killing of pigs, chickens, cows, and other animals. Why? And no, I’m not a vegetarian, yet, but I’m going to head down that route instead of this now because this is all feeling like too much of a marketing fad and not of any profound teaching.

    ryan wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • @Ryan,

      By all means, pursue whatever path you feel guided to. Meat or no meat, primal is about living more naturally, more in tune with life and yourself. I don’t believe Mark is proposing a “make it up as we go” philosophy. In fact, other than updating and modifying his philosophy, he seems to stay true to the spirit of Primal. This article rings strong and true for me. And I’ll stick to the meat, fats, veggies & fruits with moderate exercising.

      Betorq wrote on March 13th, 2013
      • Fair enough. I didn’t mean to attack mark at all. I just get frustrated by this overwhelming sense that not all the answers are in this thing like some people seem to feel they are. At least it has got me thinking more about all of this, which is a good thing.

        ryan wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • Make it up as you go is how everyone lives anyway (some are just more honest/obvious about it). So what’s the problem?

      Piper A R wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • @Ryan –

      As others have pointed out, you need to go the way you need to go. But, for my money, seeking Paleo is also a serious spiritual journey.

      A carnivore at the top of the food web has to care that the soil and water are clean, so that the grass grows, so that the herbivores and other omnivores grow. A carnivore also cannot thin the herds too much as that puts their life in danger. In other words, carnivores are highly dependent on the entire food web in a way that herbivores are not.

      In that sense, humans have stewartship of (not ownership or entire responsibility for) the whole planet, simply because we are intelligent meat-eaters. Our destiny is entwined with all life on the planet.

      One of fallacies in vegetarian type thinking is assuming that protecting and honoring life means protecting and honoring only the life forms that are like us. The plants are worthy of respect and protection as well. If you insist the butcher has a violent profession, then so must the vegetable farmer. The difference only is that the butcher is more honest in his work.

      To me, fully embracing your inner carnivore is fully accept and celebrate that life and death intertwine. And someday, this mostly carnivore will become the fertilizer that feeds the plants that feeds the animals in a cycle that never ends.

      Just my 2 cents on the bigger context, if that’s what you’re looking for.

      Amy wrote on March 13th, 2013
      • You make some interesting points but I don’t think equating killing plants with killing animals is fair since plants don’t feel pain. Also, by contributing to meat eating, most paleo people are probably still eating at places that get their meat from factory farms, where the torture of animals without pain medicine takes place and on a massive scale.

        ryan wrote on March 13th, 2013
        • How do you know that plants don’t feel pain? If my skin is cut and I bleed it hurts, so if a Massai cuts a cow to bleed it, the cow must also feel pain. But if a leaf is ripped off a plant, how do we know what the plant feels? Is it a fact that plants are not sentenet, or just something to say to feel less guilty that for you and me to eat, something has to die?

          If killing something to eat is wrong, then only plants and fungi are innocent.

          Piper A R wrote on March 13th, 2013
        • “You make some interesting points but I don’t think equating killing plants with killing animals is fair since plants don’t feel pain”

          It’s not fair to you, but I’m pretty sure I’m being a whole lot fairer to the plants. 😉 As Piper rightly points out, you don’t actually know if a planet feels something like pain. None of us do.

          And even if they don’t feel pain, they certainly have a will to live that matches any animal. Generally, plants deprived of enough water or nutrients will put every last remaining ounce of energy into reproduction. They want to be alive and continue the line, just like me.

          I guess to me the “But plants doesn’t feel pain” argument is only another way of saying “But plants aren’t like me, so that doesn’t count as life I need to respect”.

          “Also, by contributing to meat eating, most paleo people are probably still eating at places that get their meat from factory farms, where the torture of animals without pain medicine takes place and on a massive scale.”

          Again, how do you know this? Have you ever visited a conventional farm? Talked to a conventional farmer? Or is it just rumors floating around the Internet or from your urban/suburban buddies?

          It’s important to realize that no farmer could make a living “torturing” animals. In our era, every farmer could have had any other profession. You’d find very few, I think, that would tell you they were forced into it. And as such many/most organic and conventional farmers and farm workers like and even love their animals :)

          If you want a quick head check about what I’m saying, pick practically any Dirty Jobs episode that visits a farm. He mostly visited conventional, large scale farmer. I will be the first to admit the conditions are not ideal or “primal” to the animals involved. However, all of them fell into the reasonable category and very far from “torture”.

          Amy wrote on March 13th, 2013
        • You guys are making a silly point. I could just as easily ask “How do YOU know that plants DO feel pain”? They don’t have a brain. You have to do better than that before you use it as an excuse to justify hurting animals in which it is clear by seeing and hearing them when they’re hurt that they’re in pain, when the same is not true for plants.

          ryan wrote on March 13th, 2013
        • I know this from reading up and watching footage of actual factory farms and also of ‘organic’ farms and such that really don’t use standards that are much better than factory farms. At the end of the day, they brand and castrate without anesthesia, artificially inseminate over and over, and other stuff to squeeze as much out of each animal for its entire existence as possible.

          ryan wrote on March 13th, 2013
        • @Ryan – Hey, you asked. :) By all means, no one is stopping you from vegetarianism if that’s how you feel.

          If the point this line of questioning was to convince me what a awful person I am because I eat meat, all I can tell you is that I’ve been down that road before and this is my conclusion whether you agree with it or not. My world view is profoundly different then “duh, animals have a brain and feel pain like I do”. *shrug*

          Amy wrote on March 14th, 2013
        • I think the biggest problem I have with your argument is that having a brain doesn’t correlate well with being able to feel pain.

          Case in point: Earthworms. They don’t have a brain. They do have ganglia, which are multiple clusters of nerve cells, found at points around the body. These are physiologically more similar to the human solar plexus than to a brain. But you bet they feel pain. Being the monster I am, I keep frogs and feed them live food from time to time. Earthworms do not appreciate being cut, or eaten. They writhe in what could be construed as pain. (Incidentally, I should note at this point that you can probably save yourself the effort of writing a long diatribe to convince me that I am a horrible human being for feeding my pets what they would eat in the wild. My little sister, a vegan for years, has made the attempt in vain for years, and she has several advantages you lack, like being someone I’ve known for her entire life, and having the ability to speak to me rather than type. Save yourself the time.)

          Other animals that lack brains include jellyfish, sponges, mussels and oysters, flatworms like planaria and sea anemones are just a few other animal groups that lack a brain. They often have nerve tissue, but no brains.

          Contrast this with the sensitive fern which immediately folds down and pulls away it’s leaves when brushed up against. It has the same ability to respond to stimuli that lower animals do…

          Another argument against this actually banks on the actual intelligence of plants. IF plants could be said to have a brain, it would reside in the roots, which are capable of sensing and responding to chemical triggers in the soil. There is also some basic documented evidence of plants engaging in “trade” with fungi in the area, forming basic symbiotic relationships with some species, but not others. This seems to imply that they can recognize and differentiate between fungal species, which requires some variety of very rudimentary intelligence. Not thought, just very basic yes/no, good/bad systems much like the invertebrates I listed above.

          In short I don’t buy into the “eating plants is better because they don’t have brains and can’t feel pain!” argument. There are just too many holes in it.

          I’m with Amy on this one. Life is life, be it mammal, fish, flatworm, fern or fungus. 😛

          Carla wrote on March 14th, 2013
      • I never said anything to try make you feel bad. You just said some stuff that I don’t see any good justification for. I haven’t heard anything profound from you. If you’re keeping it to yourself, though, then that’s fine.

        Like I said, I’m literally just now becoming a vegetarian, and hopefully vegan really, because I think we _all_ should feel a little bad about what happens to animals needlessly just so we can pig on meat and other animal products. It’s bad for us overall, it’s bad for the environment overall, and it’s bad for the animals period. Fortunately, the market is full of alternatives (vege burgers/chicken, soy/almond milk, etc). So we have no good excuses.

        Even Eintein said. “I have always eaten animal flesh with a somewhat guilty conscience.” “So I am living without fats, without meat, without fish, but am feeling quite well this way. It always seems to me that man was not born to be a carnivore.” “Besides agreeing with the aims of vegetarianism for aesthetic and moral reasons, it is my view that a vegetarian manner of living by its purely physical effect on the human temperament would most beneficially influence the lot of mankind.”

        ryan wrote on March 14th, 2013
        • @Ryan – As rare as it is to find a meat eater who can avoid the troubles and moral issues associated with conventional meat production, it is equally as rare for a vegetarian in modern soceity to avoid the troubles and moral issues associated with monoculture and conventional agriculture.

          You mention almond milk. The almond industry is wrecking havoc on honey bee populations.

          You mention soy milk. Soybeans are produced almost exclusively as GMO products in the USA. This promotes widespread use of herbicide and pesticide.

          You mention veggie burgers. Any processed frozen food will result in undue pollution.

          Further, the proper management of grasslands requires integration of grazing herds. The absence of cows and sheep would result in a major part of the life cycle of grasslands to be absent and, ultimately, result in unproductive, destroyed land. Allowing livestock to graze unmonitored and without selective slaughter for consumption would also destroy grasslands.

          A vegetarian should recognize that their actions have an equal or greater negative impact on the environment and the cycle of life as any other choice of diet.

          Todd wrote on March 17th, 2013
  12. Great article. I work in sales where whatever you do, it’s not enough. Then next year, you have to somehow top what you did the year before. This pattern is both stressful depleting. Some days I go home and just want to crack a beer and chill. However, I get on my rower, grab my jump rope or get out a kettlebell and go to town. Then, i have that beer :)

    Dan wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • I used to work in sales and I can totally relate. But I always said that if I kept up my exercise, my life always seemed to work out OK.

      Alison Golden wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • Yeah, in computer programming it’s the same thing, except with learning: You can never know enough. And you reach a threshold but it’s hard to know when you reach a point of diminishing returns.

      ryan wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • I’m in sales and used to think the same. But then started working less and focusing on leveraging the assets I already had. My clients. Now they find people for me and all I have to do is help them, care, and provide good service. Work less and make more yes please.

      Darren wrote on March 13th, 2013
  13. I agree that today especially, a person who wants to get ahead in his or her choice of careen will have to work hard at it. Of course, that was probably true in the 1500’s, too. However, much of what we see in America today regarding not taking the easy way is the direct result of the Puritan/Protestant work ethic brought about by Luther and Calvin, espeically Calvin. To work, to keep busy, to be disciplined was to be doing God’s work on Earth. Prior to the Reformation it was not considered bad if a person did not work hard at anything just so long as he or she did not bother other people. After the Puritan work ethic took hold, idle hands were the Devil’s workshop.

    D. M. Mitchell wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • I have heard that philosophy. I think the secret is working smart, toward a goal that makes sense, not just moving a pile of rocks one rock at a time from one side of the yard to the other. I don’t do work for work’s sake.

      gibson wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • D.M. – interesting points about the origin of this whole protestant work ethic.

      This whole “keep busy thing” I’d imagine is behind the 40 hour work week. Let’s face it, maybe 10 hours of that work is productive and real work (at best). I guess it’s just a volume approach – even if you are horrible inefficiency, if you work 40 hours you are bound to accomplish something.


      Alexander wrote on March 13th, 2013
      • I’ve always mocked the Protestant work ethic. Been laughed at and ridiculed for never having a 40 hour work week in the good ‘ol U.S. of A. Traveling around the world has allowed me to see how much more relaxed other cultures are, and by slowing down, life can be beautiful again.

        Nocona wrote on March 13th, 2013
        • I don’t know. I tried sloth but it didn’t make me happy. (Seriously)

          Work saves me from myself. It only gets silly when you try to make it your church, social life, and family too.

          Amy wrote on March 13th, 2013
        • This might not makes sense, but I really don’t know how to go about working less. I’m so bound up in expenses that I can’t figure out how I could get by with less $$$. This is the real trap for me. I never meant to grow up to be a stooge.

          Julie wrote on March 14th, 2013
      • Personally think Calvin messed up big too. If you look at the parable about the talents. god rewards those who invest in their talents.
        If you invest in yourself and are smart about it. God gives you more. Says nothing about toiling away like a fool. And not working smart leaves you with empty hands. Totally believe in less is more. If you are smart about it. But those who don’t do anything end up with nothing so definitely a middle ground. At least my interpretation lol.

        Darren wrote on March 13th, 2013
        • doesn’t say anything about toiling like a fool, but it does say pretty clearly to apply your “talents”

          kraut wrote on March 13th, 2013
  14. I exercise the path of least resistance when exercising. With that being said I walk everyday, do push ups and pull-ups. I have found for me personally that just doing these exercises offers such great results that when I feel good, I do more. I don’t stress trying to be a gym rat, If I feel like working out harder than normal, I do. If not, I don’t stress it. I love it, I actually enjoy exercising instead of dreading it.

    Josh wrote on March 13th, 2013
  15. Great stuff, Mark. Seems that one of the big differences between our distant ancestors and us is that we work to make our mark (couldn’t resist the pun) and accumulate something to leave behind, instead of making the most of day-to-day existence. That seems to be where so much long-term angst comes from…but also where much the good stuff of civilization (music, art, stories, architecture) comes from.

    Tom B-D wrote on March 13th, 2013
  16. I love this post.

    It’s like reading a letter.

    Thanks, Mark.

    Scratch wrote on March 13th, 2013
  17. Four hours of ‘work’ per day is fine for primative tribes, but that’s no way to build empires or corporations. Whips can keep the slaves building pyrimids, but a cultural value system that encourages pointless toil for the benefit of Somebody Else is far more effective.

    Piper A R wrote on March 13th, 2013
  18. Why do we need to judge this is good, this is bad all the time… Easy or not, we should all beat our own path… one that is right for us and brings us pleasure.

    I think its more about enjoyment than easy, even hard things feel easy when they are enjoyable…

    Serge wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • Monkey see, monkey do.

      Paleo Bon Rurgundy wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • Yes! Different strokes for different folks. For some people work is the end of their lives… they want to work more and make more and gain prestige and assets. That is the truest expression of who they are and that’s fine. Others live to have fun and help others have fun, they are social and friendly and happy. For them working hard all day would be a drag, just as having ‘fun’ all day for the first group would feel like a waste. Other people live in their heads, thinking hard and often and reveling in new thorny problems to solve, whereas I live in my heart, using my hands to draw, paint and write about fantasies and feelings and I get the highest satisfaction when I am creating.

      None of these approaches to life are wrong, just different. Do what you’re made for. Don’t be the ant who harasses the grasshopper, be the ant who feeds the grasshopper so the two of you may dance and enjoy the sound of his fiddle together.


      Tim wrote on March 14th, 2013
  19. There are beneficial things that are hard – and those are worth slogging through. Though there is pain, the price is validated by the results.
    And then there are those things are just “a pain.” Those pains bring stress without a justifying benefit, and should be eliminated!

    Mimi wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • Mimi, you just really brought it home for me.

      I’m just starting down the Primal path and loving it so much already, but I am involved in some charity work at the moment that has me acting as Chairperson to clear up my predecessor’s mess and it’s really taking it’s toll on me. I know nothing of employing people, cracking whips or running a business (I have never wanted to be nor led anyone to believe I could be, a leader) I just want to be the stay at home mother, who loves to write and learn about being healthy and cooks for her 3 kids as I have been for two years now.

      I have been thrown in at the deep end and everyday there’s something new, something worse, that I have to sort out and deal with even though I don’t get paid for it nor have a clue how to do it, but I’m slogging through because I’m the only one who has stood up to do what’s right.

      I am going to start by stepping down from the post of acting chair and gradually work my way out the door now; I have seen that sometimes the hard work pays off and sometimes it’s just plain hard work that never ends, and I think I’ve done my share now. Time for someone else to take the reins so I can concentrate on turning my family into purebred Grokkers!

      Thank you for liberating me!

      TamJohnson wrote on March 13th, 2013
      • It’s tough – but assuming you want the charity to succeed, focus on delegating. In some ways it’s the toughest part of management, but if you can figure out how to delegate some of the busy work and instead focus on keeping people accountable for the results, you might be well be able to get time to focus on your family and get the charity where it needs to go.
        A job needs to get done. That doestn’t mean *you* have to do it. As the chair, you don’y have to do it, you have to call people out if they don’t do it.

        I think you can reduce your workload and become more effective, but at the end of the day it’s a personal thing.

        kraut wrote on March 13th, 2013
  20. Thank you, Mark! Long ago, I realized that a “take-it-easy” person will work more efficiently because they will develop quicker, easier ways to do anything. I learned to set up spreadsheets that would save me hours of work, organize my home and my office to save steps and use resistance exercise rather than hours of cardio to save my ligaments. If that’s being lazy, so be it! :)

    gibson wrote on March 13th, 2013
  21. I don’t fold clothes. Some must be hung up but the majority are tossed/crammed in a drawer. Call me a slob if you like but I have more time with my little girls. What a timesaver!! :)

    Katie wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • most of my clothes never make it off the top of the dryer or from the pile in the laundry basket. Same as my bed…why make it when i’m going to mess it up again?

      jrVegantoPrimal wrote on March 13th, 2013
      • I agree Bon.

        I used to think that way. But then I figured eventually that I’m worth a made bed and put away clothes. Much happier with what life has handed me when my stuff and I are worth taking care of.

        Amy wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • +1

      Joy Beer wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • -100

      But that is me.

      Paleo Bon Rurgundy wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • Life’s too short to fold or iron things. With the exception of work shirts. IMHO.

      kraut wrote on March 13th, 2013
  22. I think it depends. Pick your battles. Then, once you are in battle, resist with all your might. During peacetime, take the path of leash resistance.

    Nicole wrote on March 13th, 2013
  23. There is so much complexity in our life, we have to take shortcuts if we are not to be overwhelmed. The trick is to decide which is most important, then organize and systematize as much as possible so that basics are on autopilot as much as possible. The next trick is to prioritize the most important challenges that are left and go for them HARD.

    Alison Golden wrote on March 13th, 2013
  24. totally random and not relevant to this article but i didnt know where to put it but i like the new pic on the blog :) on your laptop sitting on the what looks like the most coziest couch
    that couch is primal at its finest :p any more paleolithic and you’d be sitting on a couch-shaped rock right outta the Flintstones

    Steffo wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • I saw that today too and thought the same! Nice happy photo 😀

      Elizabeth wrote on March 13th, 2013
      • The balancing acts are impressive. I saw the video. Mark is like a pro tightrope walker, especially because the band seems more unstable than a rope.

        Animanarchy wrote on March 16th, 2013
  25. Holy S$@!! People Relax and take it in a little. Alls that Mark is saying is that we can learn a bit about what forms and drives our behavior by thinking about the quality of the experience in getting through life. Sometimes it’s okay to smell the roses:) Cheers Mark! I hear ya loud and clear!!!

    BJ wrote on March 13th, 2013
  26. Took me 40 years to figure this out, and I’m still working on it, but what a difference it’s made. I used to exercise for hours a day, log every calorie, + now I eat simply, and exercise hard, 20 minutes a stint a few times a week-best shape of my life (3 kids later). I eat better than ever too. The time thing is still a monster I have to tame, but I am definitely making progress, and enjoying the difference. Great read Mark!

    kate wrote on March 13th, 2013
  27. I too can really resonate with this post. I realized quite a while ago that “playing to my stengths” seemed like the easy way out…but it was actually the smart way. When I do things that seem easy or that I like, I will be happier doing them and likely to keep doing them.

    Also, he older I get, the more I realize I don’t want to do “shoulds” but will do “wants” and that is largely determined by how I feel after doing something. I used to beat myself up for not doing this or not doing that, but now I realize I am living my greatest life and it was all because I took the time to do the soul searching in what my true “wants” are.
    I will also be the first one to say that it is difficult to know what all your strengths and wants are..until you try a variety of things and realize that something are just not for you. So, get out there, live your life, try new things and it becomes more and more crystal clear :-)

    Janine wrote on March 13th, 2013
  28. Taking the easy way is great….just don’t confuse it with the half-assed way.

    Jon wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • Yes…Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance! If you’re going to do anything, use it as meditation and do it the best you can.

      Nocona wrote on March 13th, 2013
  29. This one resonates with me, as did 4 Hour Work Week. It is about working smarter not harder.

    I am an idea guy, so I need to team up with the one who can take my ideas and make them reality. We both win as do those I want to help.

    Mark A. Michael wrote on March 13th, 2013
  30. Interesting concept. I found myself identifying with “that guy” who thinks he should always be doing something to move forward instead of resting and taking it easy. You reminded me to stop and smell the roses. Thanks for that!

    Dr. Mark wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • Dr. Ajay Kumar did his doctorate in Medicine from the prestigious All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. He did his residencey in physical medicine and rehabiliatation at Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia .

      PainManagement wrote on March 26th, 2013
  31. I have found that I need to be kinder to myself…which doesn’t always mean the easier way out but less can be more effective, less stressful and can cause less bodily pain and injury. So, by being kinder, I mean working out every 3 days, taking a day off to let your body rest and recover, then going back again. I wasn’t doing the recovery part and it was too taxing. Plus, that doesn’t mean I have to beat myself up for taking a day off…no, i’ve earned it. In the end, it’s about finding the BALANCE (inside and out,)knowing your limitations and working within those parameters for optimal health inside and out….not taking the easy way out! And, don’t forget to meditate :)

    Susan wrote on March 13th, 2013
  32. Very interesting subject .. And not talked about nearly enough !

    Amm wrote on March 13th, 2013
  33. I have a teacher that says “If you want something done efficiently, give it to the laziest person. They will find a way to do it efficiently.”

    Not always true, sometimes they just won’t do it but I thought it was an interesting way of thinking about people who are not the type to toil endlessly. I don’t value people by how hard they work, though. I don’t relate to applauding people just because of the toil. I mean I applaud the toil, because it’s impressive when someone does something hard and succeeds, but I also applaud if someone does something well and efficiently and doesn’t toil.

    Willow wrote on March 13th, 2013
    • Your right lazy people don’t get things done. The actual saying is ” If you want something done give it to a busy man” Busy people are generally efficient and are the ones who devise shortcuts.

      RJ wrote on March 13th, 2013
  34. @serge Well said!

    lorraine wrote on March 13th, 2013
  35. I used to work for a boss that continually send my work back to me because I finished it so quickly that it couldn’t possibly be “right”. I continued to work at the same pace, but set my Outlook to send the files at 9 or 10:00 at night and on weekends. Suddenly, I was the golden child and my work was highly regarded and I was held up to others as an example of hard work and a solid work ethic. What a lesson to learn. So many people value time more than intelligence. I almost view it as a misery loves company situation. “Your miserable and working on the weekends? You must be doing something right.”

    wendy wrote on March 13th, 2013
  36. Nicole’s posts sums up my opinion. Pick your battle and give it your all. When you’re not in a battle, kick back and relax.

    Wayne wrote on March 13th, 2013
  37. You should only be working hard if it is actually IMPROVING your health, and well-being.

    Hard work is not to be encouraged. Results are to be encouraged. Only work hard when working smart and efficiently is not an option. Do what needs to be done. Know when enough is enough, ad when you are getting diminishing results.

    me wrote on March 13th, 2013
  38. I totally live just like mark said here… I i DID choose to leave many “Things” behind and smell the roses on my hill country here in Texas.I do hunter and gathering for real. Thank you Mark!

    Alexandra wrote on March 13th, 2013
  39. I’m reading (and highly recommend) The Longevity Project, about a landmark 8-decade study. The researchers compared those who stayed productive in their 70s and beyond with those who took it easy. The findings: those who were continually productive lived much longer than the more-laid back subjects. As the authors say, “The long-lived didn’t shy away from hard work for fear that the stress of it would lead to an early demise; the exact opposite seems true!”

    So keep working hard, Mark. I know I speak for many when I say that one result, for which I am supremely grateful, is the marked improvement in my quality of life.

    Susan B. wrote on March 13th, 2013

Leave a Reply

If you'd like to add an avatar to all of your comments click here!

© 2016 Mark's Daily Apple

Subscribe to the Newsletter and Get a Free Copy
of Mark Sisson's Fitness eBook and more!