Marks Daily Apple
Serving up health and fitness insights (daily, of course) with a side of irreverence.
31 Jul

Weekend Link Love – Edition 153

weekend link loveA writer from The Atlantic tries the Paleo diet, feels great on it, loves it, yet still wonders whether it’s “an unhealthy fad.” Be forewarned: life expectancy is mentioned and Atkins parallels are drawn. Some good comments, though, by Melissa and Patrik.

Was this a “special Primal issue”? The Atlantic explains how buying grass-fed beef might just save the bees.

Sure, tanning might increase the risk of certain cancers, but not tanning is probably way, way worse. What we’ve known for years is starting to hit the mainstream.

The NY Times asks, “Can a playground be too safe?” Hint: Yes. And it’s actually more dangerous in the long run.

People from polar regions have bigger eyes and brains to help with the processing of visual data in an environment with less sunlight. This confirms what researchers have long suspected: vikings looked like anime characters.

Jane Brody, the NY Times health writer who once told readers to simply “eat less, exercise more,” now admits that old advice “may be outdated.” Watch her admit that counting calories is usually ineffective and laugh smugly to yourselves (I sure did).

Forget this debt limit stuff: bacon prices are on the rise!

Recipe Corner

  • It doesn’t have a name, and it looks a bit like “puke,” but it’s tasty and nutritious. Try “one of the most delicious things” the author’s “ever made.”
  • Grilled onions and tomatoes from Purely Primal. Sometimes, you just want a plate full of plant matter.

Time Capsule

One year ago (July 25 – July 31)

Comment of the Week

All the time (but she’s 4 now!) I throw her up in the air, starting in the squat position. I also have her stand on my foot, holding my hands and kick/swing her in the air and she does a flip in mid air. I also do pushups with her on my back, and climb playground equipment with her in ways that the equipment wasn’t designed for. We also spring (barefoot) up and down the street together. We’re both working out, just by playing!

- Reader Vince gets it.

You want comments? We got comments:

Imagine you’re George Clooney. Take a moment to admire your grooming and wit. Okay, now imagine someone walks up to you and asks, “What’s your name?” You say, “I’m George Clooney.” Or maybe you say, “I’m the Clooninator!” You don’t say “I’m George of George Clooney Sells Movies Blog” and you certainly don’t say, “I’m Clooney Weight Loss Plan”. So while spam is technically meat, it ain’t anywhere near Primal. Please nickname yourself something your friends would call you.

  1. “There’s no doubt that the Paleo approach is a powerful meme, but as advice for regular people it’s just not very practical.”

    That is the last sentence in the paleo article. No one has no idea how much this bugs me. Not a damn soul. Not even myself.

    I could just scream at the top of my lungs until I die right now…

    Primal Toad wrote on July 31st, 2011
    • I haven’t had a bite of bacon in over a month. Thus the fact that prices are on the rise does not concern me. Maybe, just maybe, this means the price of grass-fed beef will go down?

      Primal Toad wrote on July 31st, 2011
    • I agree, Todd.

      As I see it, here’s the simple logic: First you do it, and then you start looking and feeling better, so you keep doing it, and pretty soon, it eclipses the old way, and by that time, it’s “practical.”

      Which means you’re not ‘regular” anymore, which is great. What’s the upside, after all, to being “regular”?

      :-)

      Susan Alexander wrote on July 31st, 2011
      • Hi, there, Susan. So fun to meet you :-D

        Ulla Lauridsen wrote on July 31st, 2011
    • I agree – what’s “not practical” about eating decent quality, unprocessed foods? Never been a conformist anyway, so I must be on the right track again with this.

      Corinne Spiers wrote on August 1st, 2011
    • sad days when living healthier lives is considered “not very pratical”.

      FoCo Girl wrote on August 1st, 2011
    • I have to agree Toad. The article bugged me too. Its hard for me to pin down exactly why, possibly it was the general tone, it seemed dismissive: “Hey I lost weight and feel great, but don’t do this it’s just too hard and might be dangerous (but nobody knows for sure)” (paraphrased, obviously)

      My experience is completely contradictory to the article’s assertion that only highly motivated health nuts are doing paleo. I am neither. I’m a creative guy with little willpower who can barely keep it together to long enough to finish my own creative projects let alone stick to a diet (although having gone paleo, I’ve been completing things much faster and easier, go figure). Yet here I am, in a few days I’ll have been paleo for an entire year. I’ll admit I’m not exactly chiseled yet but I’m working toward that. I’m not really concerned though because I feel so much better and have seen so many nagging health problems evaporate.

      I think the diet can be for everyone, even inconstant flakes like me, but I also think that there’s a large community that’s very heavily invested (professionally and financially) in the current conventional whole grains, veggies and lean meats paradigm. On the one hand I have the impulse to help my friends and family by telling them what I’m doing, how much better I feel, and how my triglycerides are 59. On the other I understand how much counter information is out there and how most people don’t want to be told what to do, they want to discover it for themselves. It’s something I think about a lot.

      Tim wrote on August 3rd, 2011
  2. I was shocked–but thrilled–to see those articles in the Atlantic. Of course the tone will be skeptical, but I think the fact that’s it’s even being discussed is excellent news, for everybody.

    Such an interesting NYT article on the playground. I loved the playground as a kid, but now that I’m a parent, they kind of freak me out! I’ve witness too many broken arms, legs and collarbones to feel altogether comfortable with my kids on the climby things. But I never before thought about how the inherent risk and challenge is as good for kids as the muscle-building activity and fresh air. Interesting stuff.

    Anne wrote on July 31st, 2011
    • Although skeptical, I still think the article is progress in the right direction. Maybe we’ll see the next article without the skeptical part and more open mindness. However, at least they were open-minded enough to try.

      Trevor Frayne wrote on July 31st, 2011
    • I was very mindful to let my child’s inner risk taker out. my parents tended to over protect and that left me with a fair amount of phobias to overcome. Sometimes I had to avert my eyes and I did have to tell her no when she wanted to go “free climbing” but she made it to 21 with no broken bones (knock on wood) and only a few minor injuries.

      bbuddha wrote on July 31st, 2011
      • My mother also has her fair share of phobias but recognized that she didn’t want to pass those on to her kids. It was a wonder that I made it through childhood without any broken bones – I tried to climb and/or jump off of everything! At 30 I have yet to go the ER. *knock on wood*

        FoCo Girl wrote on August 1st, 2011
    • So perhaps the playground is and old play structures were good for parents as well as the children.

      As a society, I think that we’ve really locked our children down to the point where they have no other options than to play video games. We tell them there are bad people out there (there are, but probably not any more than when we were kids, really), that getting hurt is a bad thing and that they shouldn’t do anything to endanger themselves (they shouldn’t, but will), and then we tell them they need to “get outside and go do something,” but won’t let them out without parental supervision. But they’re left alone when they’re ‘safe’ in front of the TV, or playing video games, or online. Safe in their homes, they’re not getting any of that exercise that we got as children (we called it play).

      So maybe a broken bone isn’t such a bad thing. Teaches us as parents that it’s okay to let our children take those risks necessary to develop cognitively, so they can take risks (both physical, emotional, financial, etc.) when they’re older. After all, the goal of a parent is to give a child a toolbox which they can use to navigate life and thrive in whatever environment they end up in.

      I hope you don’t construe this as me getting down on you – I’m not. It’s a problem that seems to be endemic of our society (the term ‘helicopter parent’ springs to mind). My wife and I have made a conscious effort to NOT do that with our kid. The result? People will oftentimes remark to us how little he cries when he falls and ‘hurts’ himself. He’s learned what real hurt is vs. temporary “ouch”. When he does really hurt himself, we’re there to console and help him – and he knows it. As a result, he doesn’t cry every time he falls or runs into something or whatever (which he seems to do a lot – I’ll chalk it up to rambunctiousness, and not an inner ear problem :). At any rate, it’s interesting to see the difference between him and other children his age who have been raised to alarm whenever they fall over.

      Makes me wonder where the ‘bubble wrapped children’ idea came from. Because really, who wants a child that’s THAT needy?

      Hal wrote on August 1st, 2011
    • I grew up with the kind of playgrounds that they talk about as “unsafe”. I loved all the climbing structures. My parents let me do all sorts of risky things because they knew I was a cautious child and would not do anything that felt unsafe. Had they tried to coddle me too much, I would have acted out and then really done something that was unsafe. As it was, my total injury count for my entire childhood was one broken arm, when I fell off a pullup bar. I was 11 years old; bones heal well at that age. I have no lingering ill effects from that injury.

      LM wrote on August 1st, 2011
  3. bloody hell you were quick to answer lol
    how do you manage to get the first or second comment on these posts?
    i want your awesomeness speed toad please tell me how

    vishal wrote on July 31st, 2011
  4. Mark: Just read the Music Therapy post. Thanks for linking to it.

    There’s a lot about music that’s Primal. Thought you and your readers might like this post on this topic, based on the work of neuroscientist Dan Levitin: http://bit.ly/fv4GHl

    His book, This Is Your Brain On Music, is a great read.

    Susan

    Susan Alexander wrote on July 31st, 2011
  5. Interesting links again. Funny how things change in the world of diets and nutrition in general.

    Mary Hone wrote on July 31st, 2011
  6. I always knew that my skins natural sunblock is 100% better than smearing lab produced creams on my skin.
    When I lived in WA State I had to go tan artificially (tanning booth) to repair my D3 levels…which is bad, too.
    At the time, I didn’t know about cod liver oil and non of hte doctors EVER suggested it.
    Sure glad I moved to a sunny state. :-)

    Kaiser Wilhelm wrote on July 31st, 2011
  7. Seeing that tanning article in mainstream is definitely a major step forward. However, some people take on some responsible tanning tips from that one.

    Trevor Frayne wrote on July 31st, 2011
  8. ethanol strikes again. It is crap for our cars, actually uses more fuel to produce and takes corn away from the poor pigs :-(
    On a happy note, the place we get our meat hasn’t increased the price of bacon or pork chops, at least not yet.

    bbuddha wrote on July 31st, 2011
    • And ethanol takes food away from poor humans. Driving your car on food is sick and should be forbidden instead of encouraged.

      Victor wrote on August 1st, 2011
      • Try not to get too emotional about ethanol now. There is really nothing wrong with it if produced right. I can makes gallons of it in my back yard with a wood powerd, solar powered, or electric still using old rotting produce, and the return on energy invested is great. The whole argument that it takes away from the food of poor people is pretty misguided too. Is mass produced genetically modified corn really food? And maybe people without the means to provide for themselves shouldn’t be having 5 to 10 kids. Having a bunch of kids is a much bigger stress on the environment than driving around a car. Also, if an engine is designed around the use of ethanol, it makes a great fuel. It doesn’t go bad like gas, burns much cleaner, and is renewable. If using ethanol for fuel instead of food is immoral, than drinking any alcohol would also be immoral….which it isn’t.

        Jeffery wrote on August 1st, 2011
  9. It’s not really about living like a caveman , hunter-gatherer, Paleolithic man, it’s about living like a human, a Homo sapiens and not living like a robot or a replaceable cog in an industial machine .

    Like Eckhart Tolle and other wisdom teachers say the words are just signposts or symbols don’t become attacked to them. Paleo , Primal , Caveman all great words just like natural , organic and pure. but my reading of Michael Pollan makes me fear the rise of “Big Paleo” a commercialized corporate bastardization as it goes more mainstream.

    Yes, it is not practical to live exactly like a 100,000 year old hunter-gatherer , but the positive behaviours they lived that benefit us are practical and enjoyable.

    Alex wrote on July 31st, 2011
  10. Blah, sun exposure causes nothing in the case of healthy skin. I fell asleep in the sun earlier for over 2 hours and woke up with a bit of color but nothing close to burning. Dietary carotenoids are a natural sunscreen.

    Stabby wrote on July 31st, 2011
    • +1

      Not sure how I would do in the sun for 2 straight hours as I have not tried it since being primal but right on with antioxidants being a natural sunscreen. I heard a nice tan helps too!

      Primal Toad wrote on July 31st, 2011
      • I can feel when a sunburn is starting such that if I go inside as soon as the warning happens I’ll go pink for about 4 hours and then back to normal.

        A year ago (and 9 months before I started doing primal) that happened after half an hour.

        Now it happens after about 2 hours. I’m still pretty pasty too, although that’s been changing over the last several months.

        Warren wrote on July 31st, 2011
    • Fourth.

      Vivian wrote on July 31st, 2011
  11. Tanning and burning-two different things.

    I.Don’t.Burn.Anymore.

    This pasty whiteboy is turning into a bronzed marvel this year w/o really trying. Yet another astonishing side effect of PB.

    IvyBlue wrote on July 31st, 2011
    • Inherently, there is now the problem of tan lines. The US should just be more European and embrace nakedness.

      Vivian wrote on July 31st, 2011
      • I am European and have a huge problem with tan lines D:

        No matter how much shirtless exposure I get, they won’t go away – instead of white and brown it’s just brown and dark brown now.

        Time to establish loincloths as everyday wear I guess :D

        Revak wrote on August 1st, 2011
  12. There’s a link in “What Grok Can Teach Us About Leisure Time” to a National Geographic article about the Hadzu, a surviving hunter-gatherer group in Africa. If you’ve never read it, it’s great information and reality-based motivation.

    Tim wrote on July 31st, 2011
  13. interesting…what will evolution yeild

    Dasbutch wrote on July 31st, 2011
  14. …and since the brain is mostly fatty protein, it’s logical why those in Polar Regions, whom live mostly on fatty protein, i.e. animals, have bigger brains. Those in southern regions that have abundant plants as food have smaller brains. Any rocket scientists come out of equator regions?

    Dasbutch wrote on July 31st, 2011
    • The human body is mostly water. It is logical that those living in the dry Mid West have smaller bodies and brains as people from the coastal regions. Any rocket scientists coming out of the Bible Belt?

      Humans are one of the most adaptive animals!

      Victor wrote on August 1st, 2011
    • Well, considering that Algebra was developed in the middle east, and that gunpowder was developed in China, I think that realistically ALL rocket scientists originated from tropical regions. Not to mention all the Indian men and women in the tech industry.

      So yeah, I think they have some pretty significant contributions to the area of rocket science :)

      Hal wrote on August 1st, 2011
  15. Grilled Onions and Tomatoes! YUM!! Gotta Love grilling season, its not around for very long here in MN!

    The Real Food Mama wrote on July 31st, 2011
  16. Mark’s book “The Primal Blueprint” showed up in my amazon Quick Picks today! Are they trying to tell me something??? LOL

    PrimalGrandma wrote on July 31st, 2011
  17. I’m not sure how much press coverage the rest of the world gets on it, but it’s predicted that there should soon be a skin cancer vaccine available. Prof Ian Frazer, the man who created the Gardasil vaccine (to prevent cervical cancer), is now in the process of making a skin cancer vaccine and predicts it will be ready in about a year. From someone who has grown up in Northern Queensland in Australia, it is considered the skin cancer capital of the world and can take only 6 minutes to burn and the UV rays are quite dangerous at such high levels. I would love to be able to spend more time in the sun without feeling guilty or worrying about deadly Melanomas. Let’s hope this vaccine becomes a reality…

    April wrote on July 31st, 2011
  18. Hopefully this won’t do much to grass-fed pork! I love my bacon too much.

    PrimalKite wrote on July 31st, 2011
  19. I thought this was a relevant article, sort of.

    Owling – Grok squatting in an attempt to make a spectacle of yourself.

    http://www.sott.net/articles/show/232304-Forget-planking-who-s-up-for-owling-

    That website is really good by the way. The people who manage it are all against Big Pharma and whatnot and the health section often has articles supporting the paleo diet and bashing grains, sugars, gluten etc.

    Animanarchy wrote on July 31st, 2011
  20. “Let’s hope this vaccine becomes a reality…”

    Um, just for the record, gardasil does not prevent cervical cancer, it is meant to prevent 4 (out of several dozen) strains of HPV that if left untreated may eventually become cervical cancer.

    Do you really want to inject a drug, likely made from genetically engineered who-knows-what, grown in a culture of fetal tissue (from a human or a monkey or a cow), full of as-yet undiscovered pathogens that may wreak untold havoc, which probably won’t work half as well as hoped, and nowhere near well enough to make the side effects worth it (gardasil killed several unsuspecting girls and women) ….

    …. or do you want to take some common sense precautions against burning in the hot sun?

    cheri wrote on July 31st, 2011
    • “gardasil killed several unsuspecting girls and women”

      Citation, please.

      cTo wrote on August 1st, 2011
  21. Arghhhhh … the Atlantic article is full of what I call “anti-knowledge”, received ideas based on a false understanding.

    It was this that really annoyed me: “People have survived into their 90s and beyond on very simple and traditional diets of pasta, bread, vegetables, and small portions of meat.”

    Like who? Pasta was virtually non-existent in Britain before the 1970s; you had to go to specialist delicatessens to buy it. Even the Italians do not eat the sheer amount of pasta everyday that some in the West now do, where dinner is a huge bowl of pasta with a tomato or veg sauce.

    Again, bread before the 1950s was very different to bread today. You go back 300 years, and bread was a heavy, thick product with next to no sugar in it — you could barely eat more than two slices of the stuff.

    People simply do not realise what recent historical diets were like: cheap cuts made into stew or soup, lots of offal (tripe and onions, a bit of kidney), cooked breakfasts, eggs. The only grain products working class people in Britain ate prior to 1950 were bread, pastry, porridge and semolina: they did not really eat beans, rice, or any of the other grain products such as bulgar, pasta etc because you just couldn’t buy them.

    Then there’s this: “overriding reality of actual Paleolithic people: the scarcity, inconsistency, and lack of variety of their diet.”

    This is stupid. It really is. Even 800 years ago, the econsystems of Western countries were teaming with life. I live in a place that is documented as a medieval hunting and fishing ground in the 1200s, where if you shot an arrow with a blindfold on, you would hit a deer. With populations less than a tenth of what they are now, there really is no reason to think there would be any scarcity at all.

    The Atlantic author just hasn’t thought properly at all.

    Alex Grace wrote on August 1st, 2011
    • ALSO, yeah they may be living into their 90s, but how many of those elderly are trapped in a wheelchair and on oxygen tanks, hmm? Oh but CW says thats normal for old people, right, so its ok.

      cTo wrote on August 1st, 2011
  22. FFS, why is there so much critcism on here nowadays?
    Yes, I got the Gardasil vaccine. It’s my choice and my body. No need to criticise my choices, just don’t get it yourself. Easy…
    I do take precautions in the sun, and will never be a person who lies down in the sun for hours, and it’s obviously not what I was saying I was going to do once I got the vaccine.
    However, if a vaccine becomes available that may prevent me getting skin cancer, then I will look into that when it does and decide whether I would like to get it or not.
    I didn’t put my comment up to persuade people to do it. I simply mentioned it because it’s big in the news in Aus atm, and thought I would see if anyone else had heard about it in other countries.
    Geez… Next time I’ll keep my comments to myself…

    April wrote on August 1st, 2011
  23. Newbie here, so my intent is to learn, not poke holes or complain. Anyway, I read the line “Atkins parallels are drawn” under the “forewarned” comment, so I gather PB folks don´t like the comparison.
    Not sure I understand the difference…yes, Atkins seems to not differentiate a lean cut of beef from a glass of bacon fat, and they have lots of “products” and sweeteners, etc…but ultimately, are they not just hi-protein low carb diets? (speaking of nutrition only, not exercise, lifestyle, etc) Thoughts?

    NewbieR wrote on August 1st, 2011
    • I would say that most people in the ‘primalsphere’ are not anti-carb – in fact quite the opposite. They are, however, anti grain, sugars and legume. From a macronutrient perspective, this ends up looking similar.

      But with Adkins, you start off with almost no carbs for a couple weeks, then you dial it back until you find a balance you can live with. This means you find where you ‘feel the best’, then dial up the carbs (source undifferentiated) until you find a good maintenance point.

      Primal/paleo says “don’t eat stuff that’s not good for you”. Now, you probably won’t be perfect, but you’re not consuming anti-nutrients on a daily basis. Carbohydrates come from plant sources such as fruits, squashes, leafy and cruciferous vegetables. Additionally, primal/paleo looks at the nutrition profiles of different fats and eliminates some of those fats based on the type (very few vegetable oils, and no seed or grain oils, for example, are preferred as they are inflammatory in the human body).

      So really, I see the Adkins diet as carbohydrate-averse, while I see the primal/paleo lifestyles as carb-friendly – depending on the source of the carb. Hope that helps.

      Hal wrote on August 1st, 2011
      • God stuff, thank you Hal!

        Been at it for a few weeks and alls well. Particularly love the workout philosophy. Have always been a bit of a gym-rat, but the total body, lift heavy things idea has freed me up!

        Ultimately, just feeling better.

        Again, thanks for taking the time to answer!

        NewbieR wrote on August 1st, 2011
  24. Did you see Dr. Oz’s RealAge site actually has a positive Paleo article on it?? Could Taubes have gotten through to them finally? LOL

    AmyNVegas wrote on August 1st, 2011
  25. Response I left for the article in The Atlantic-
    I am a 37 year old teacher, and I consider myself to be pretty normal not a health nut just looking for a better way for my body. I have been obese my whole life. I have followed the Primal Blueprint version of Paleo for about 2 years and after failing at every other plan known to man including Gastric Bypass (at 535 pounds in 2001) it is the only thing that has ever made sense to my mind and body and is extremely easy to follow. I am under 300 pounds for the first time since the 4th grade and I have energy and strength I haven’t had since I was a young obese child. I have lost 84 pounds so far and gained a body that is inflammation and pain free even with daily activity and a pretty strenuous weight workout several days a week; at 297 pounds I am healthier than I have ever been as an adult. I finally have hope that I can be a healthy normal weight adult and live a long healthy life despite my family history (both of my parents are deceased due to obesity related illnesses). I would encourage more people to stop thinking of it as a fad diet and think more along the lines of it is a sensible lifestyle. The Primal 80/20 lifestyle allows for the little guilty pleasures without totally derailing your health.

    AmyNVegas wrote on August 1st, 2011
    • Unexpected success story! :D High-5!

      cTo wrote on August 1st, 2011
    • Amy,
      I’m starting the road toward the primal lifestyle as another bypass patient, how did/do you handle the fats?
      I lost 140lb via a registered dietitian and gastric bypass only put back 30lbs and am stuck I’m not at my ideal weight but am very excited about all the positive things I’ve been reading. Even the registered dietitian in the surgery practice is suggesting this life style for me since everything else isn’t working any more. I’ve had issues with hypoglycemia all my life and now it is harder to control it. I dump on fats and sugars but it is unpredictable when I’ll dump and on what cause it happens even with food I’ve eaten regularly.

      Laura wrote on May 1st, 2012
  26. Monkey bars are important! The Crossfit Games this weekend had a monkey bars component in one of the events. :D

    Christine M. wrote on August 1st, 2011
  27. Nice to see Paleo eating getting some respectable press, but that was a fluff piece. Most of it was just recycled from other sources–the only novel bit was the author’s personal experience, and that got very little page space.

    I was especially surprised by the comment about hunter-gatherer diets being lacking in variety. It’s fairly well established that people’s diets were more varied BEFORE the agricultural revolution. It’s not a paleo thing: archeologists and paleoanthropologists repeat it so often it’s practically an academic cliche. The point about scarcity is valid as far as it goes, but that’s what intermittent fasting and seasonal eating are trying to address!

    Anyway, I don’t think the Atlantic did its homework.

    I’m curious, though, about what people think of the author’s suggestion that the Paleo crowd is drawn specifically by the diet’s difficulty.

    Weatherwax wrote on August 1st, 2011
  28. “This confirms what researchers have long suspected: vikings looked like anime characters.”

    Hahah! This is priceless!

    Captain Obvious wrote on August 1st, 2011
  29. I have been following the low carb lifestyle and dabbled in Paleo for the last 6 months and have really been adhering (to Paleo) as of lately. Over a year ago I lost 25 pounds and learning to maintain that took a bit of practice. Once I read “Why we get fat and what to do about it” by Gary Taubes, I knew I could never go back to eating what the mainstream considers healthy. I honestly believe in this lifestyle, yesterday I went and did the monkey bars and cartwheels after a nice long walk. Conventional exercise? no, but it makes me feel great and really happy. I tell everyone I know about it, and literally every single one of my friends has actually tried to adhere to it, and my boyfriend has completely bought it, telling me he feels healthier than ever before. How can this be impractical? At the end of the article when he mentions that this lifestyle probably works for those people who have high willpower and would be successful at any diet I at first wanted to disagree, but maybe he is right? It is hard in the beginning to learn how to avoid bread, pasta, cereal etc. but it so quickly becomes easy, and just takes a bit of thinking outside the box. I think if more people gave it a real chance the nation would quickly see the nutritionally sound light of the Paleo Lifestyle.

    I will never go back to eating carbs or processed foods again. I wish there was a way to spread the word more quickly about this extremely healthy lifestyle.

    Holly wrote on August 2nd, 2011
  30. Reading the Atlantic article on the Paleo Diet (and subsequently the US News Diet Rank article) is raising my blood pressure to unhealthly levels.

    That is, until I got to the “How well does it conform to accepted dietary guidelines?” Section of their writeup on the paleo diet. That’s when I was able to stop taking it seriously.

    “Carbohydrates. At 23 percent of daily calories from carbs, it’s far below the government’s 45 to 65 percent recommendation.” <- After reading that, all I can really do is chuckle.

    Phil Quinn wrote on August 3rd, 2011

Leave a Reply

If you'd like to add an avatar to all of your comments click here!

x

© 2014 Mark's Daily Apple