30
October
2006

Trans Fat in NYC, Foie Gras in Chicago

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

It’s Prohibition all over again. What do you all think about major cities banning certain fattening foods? Is this blatantly unconstitutional, or simply in the interest of public health? In recent months Chicago has attempted to ban foie gras (French for greasy grease) and New York has now rumbled to restaurants about frying foods in trans fat oils. Even Killing Folks Covertly (KFC) is hopping in the anti-trans fryer.

While I don’t know that foie gras tops most people’s dietary vice lists, food manufacturers’ stubborn use of trans fat is utterly irresponsible and flagrantly unethical. (Yes, I said it.)

But here’s the real question: Just like the too-skinny models (perhaps a redundancy) banned in Spain, is banning trans fat in restaurants the right step? Might we think about going to the source by sending a message to Congressional lobbyists working for Big Agra instead?

Something good from New Jersey.

Discuss, Apples.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,



1 comment

  1. Mark’s Daily Apple » Blog Archive » A Case of the Clicks:
  2. [...] Thus far, several major U.S. cities have taken steps to ban trans fat in restaurants. Now, a whole county says no to Frankenfats. [...]



Leave a Reply

Please check the box if you wish to receive email notification for all responses to this article: