<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should We Allow Drugs in Sports?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marksdailyapple.com/should-we-allow-drugs-in-sports/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marksdailyapple.com/should-we-allow-drugs-in-sports/</link>
	<description>Serving up health and fitness insights (daily, of course) with a side of irreverence.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 12:06:31 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Primal Blueprint Success Story: Former Marathoner Beating Diabetes &#124; Mark's Daily Apple</title>
		<link>http://www.marksdailyapple.com/should-we-allow-drugs-in-sports/#comment-406194</link>
		<dc:creator>Primal Blueprint Success Story: Former Marathoner Beating Diabetes &#124; Mark's Daily Apple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksdailyapple.com/?p=1237#comment-406194</guid>
		<description>[...] made it through training by the skin of my teeth and toed the starting line with a wicked upper respiratory infection. This was the single worst idea I’ve ever had in my life. This would be the pivotal decision that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] made it through training by the skin of my teeth and toed the starting line with a wicked upper respiratory infection. This was the single worst idea I’ve ever had in my life. This would be the pivotal decision that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thursday 21st: Human achievement or medical experiment? &#171; SouthBaltimore CrossFit</title>
		<link>http://www.marksdailyapple.com/should-we-allow-drugs-in-sports/#comment-130612</link>
		<dc:creator>Thursday 21st: Human achievement or medical experiment? &#171; SouthBaltimore CrossFit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksdailyapple.com/?p=1237#comment-130612</guid>
		<description>[...] As we watch the current Olympic games, we see the utmost in human potential set record after record. But are we really seeing what we think we are? Are the 8 best sprinters in the world on the track, or just the 8 people who responded to the drug treatment the best? Whether or not you think it&#8217;s a problem, the fact remains that, at the highest levels, sport follows the adage &#8220;If you&#8217;re not cheating, you&#8217;re not trying!&#8221; More often than not, this means chemical enhancement. How did it get this way? Testosterone Nation gives us a good run down here (before you click, a note on T-Nation: while they often have good articles and info, their site isn&#8217;t what I&#8217;d call classy). What&#8217;s to be done? Some people say nothing, but most would like those goosebumps they feel when someone crosses the finish line in record time to be doubt-free. Was it just him? Did he have unfair competitive advantage? What is unfair competitive advantage anyway? Malcom Gladwell, brilliant thinker and writer, blogs on the that tricky question, among other things, in this post. If something must be done, surely the solution will originate in the same place as the problem: the lab. Unfortunately, disqualifying athletes based on extremely difficult to interpret blood tests are equally murky waters. Often, these illegal performance enhancers are indistinguishable from the natural compounds in your body. Our old friends at Mark&#8217;s Daily Apple go over the difficulties of testing athletes who&#8217;s.... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As we watch the current Olympic games, we see the utmost in human potential set record after record. But are we really seeing what we think we are? Are the 8 best sprinters in the world on the track, or just the 8 people who responded to the drug treatment the best? Whether or not you think it&#8217;s a problem, the fact remains that, at the highest levels, sport follows the adage &#8220;If you&#8217;re not cheating, you&#8217;re not trying!&#8221; More often than not, this means chemical enhancement. How did it get this way? Testosterone Nation gives us a good run down here (before you click, a note on T-Nation: while they often have good articles and info, their site isn&#8217;t what I&#8217;d call classy). What&#8217;s to be done? Some people say nothing, but most would like those goosebumps they feel when someone crosses the finish line in record time to be doubt-free. Was it just him? Did he have unfair competitive advantage? What is unfair competitive advantage anyway? Malcom Gladwell, brilliant thinker and writer, blogs on the that tricky question, among other things, in this post. If something must be done, surely the solution will originate in the same place as the problem: the lab. Unfortunately, disqualifying athletes based on extremely difficult to interpret blood tests are equally murky waters. Often, these illegal performance enhancers are indistinguishable from the natural compounds in your body. Our old friends at Mark&#8217;s Daily Apple go over the difficulties of testing athletes who&#8217;s&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.marksdailyapple.com/should-we-allow-drugs-in-sports/#comment-111645</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 02:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksdailyapple.com/?p=1237#comment-111645</guid>
		<description>Mark, Thanks for your reply. Sometimes it is hard to stop training at the end of the season, but I think the payoff in terms of a longer, healthier career, is well worth it.  I learned alot from Noakes&#039;s book, &quot;Lore of Running&quot; not surprised he is well respected. It was the low intensity aerobic exercise you recommend that catapulted Mark Allen to a record 6 Ironman victories including one at age 37.  I tried it for a season and it really did work. My aerobic running pace went from 10 minutes per mile to 8 minutes in about 14 weeks.  Mark Allen&#039;s aerobic running pace dropped to around 5:30 per mile, all on easy, but voluminous, training during the base period.   Greg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, Thanks for your reply. Sometimes it is hard to stop training at the end of the season, but I think the payoff in terms of a longer, healthier career, is well worth it.  I learned alot from Noakes&#8217;s book, &#8220;Lore of Running&#8221; not surprised he is well respected. It was the low intensity aerobic exercise you recommend that catapulted Mark Allen to a record 6 Ironman victories including one at age 37.  I tried it for a season and it really did work. My aerobic running pace went from 10 minutes per mile to 8 minutes in about 14 weeks.  Mark Allen&#8217;s aerobic running pace dropped to around 5:30 per mile, all on easy, but voluminous, training during the base period.   Greg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Sisson</title>
		<link>http://www.marksdailyapple.com/should-we-allow-drugs-in-sports/#comment-111391</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sisson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 22:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksdailyapple.com/?p=1237#comment-111391</guid>
		<description>Greg, I agree with Noakes that you should take at least 2 months off. Noakes is a god among exercise physiologists, by the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, I agree with Noakes that you should take at least 2 months off. Noakes is a god among exercise physiologists, by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Millard Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.marksdailyapple.com/should-we-allow-drugs-in-sports/#comment-110459</link>
		<dc:creator>Millard Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 05:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksdailyapple.com/?p=1237#comment-110459</guid>
		<description>Mark,

This is a great observation.

&quot;...the performance requirements set by the federations at the elite level of sport almost demand access to certain “banned substances” in order to assure the health and vitality of the athlete throughout his or her career and – more importantly – into his or her life after competition.&quot;

This is especially true in &quot;extreme sports&quot; like endurance events where the extreme demands of the sport itself often compromises the health of the athlete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>This is a great observation.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;the performance requirements set by the federations at the elite level of sport almost demand access to certain “banned substances” in order to assure the health and vitality of the athlete throughout his or her career and – more importantly – into his or her life after competition.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is especially true in &#8220;extreme sports&#8221; like endurance events where the extreme demands of the sport itself often compromises the health of the athlete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Millard Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.marksdailyapple.com/should-we-allow-drugs-in-sports/#comment-110456</link>
		<dc:creator>Millard Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 05:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksdailyapple.com/?p=1237#comment-110456</guid>
		<description>Re: allow drugs in sports will disadvantage poor athletes.

I strongly disagree with this statement. PEDs are relatively inexpensive - certainly significantly less expensive than optimum nutrition.

It is drug testing that has potentially disadvantaged poor athletes because the readily available inexpensive PEDs are banned creating the market for designer steroids (afforded by affluent athletes). 

In addition, &quot;rich&quot; athletes can afford extensive monitoring to bypass detection of their use of PEDs in a drug-tested system. This potentially disadvantages poor athletes.

So,ultimately permitting PEDs in sports will help poor athletes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: allow drugs in sports will disadvantage poor athletes.</p>
<p>I strongly disagree with this statement. PEDs are relatively inexpensive &#8211; certainly significantly less expensive than optimum nutrition.</p>
<p>It is drug testing that has potentially disadvantaged poor athletes because the readily available inexpensive PEDs are banned creating the market for designer steroids (afforded by affluent athletes). </p>
<p>In addition, &#8220;rich&#8221; athletes can afford extensive monitoring to bypass detection of their use of PEDs in a drug-tested system. This potentially disadvantages poor athletes.</p>
<p>So,ultimately permitting PEDs in sports will help poor athletes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Millard Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.marksdailyapple.com/should-we-allow-drugs-in-sports/#comment-110454</link>
		<dc:creator>Millard Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 05:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksdailyapple.com/?p=1237#comment-110454</guid>
		<description>Re: competition between chemists not athletes

I couldn&#039;t disagree more with this! Over the past 15 years while working out at various commercial gyms, I&#039;ve come in contact with dozens if not hundreds of people who were using more PEDs than any Olympic-caliber athlete.

It takes infinitely more than anabolic steroids and performance enhancing drugs to make an elite athlete. A chemist has never created a drug that could remotely accomplish such a feat and most likely never will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: competition between chemists not athletes</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t disagree more with this! Over the past 15 years while working out at various commercial gyms, I&#8217;ve come in contact with dozens if not hundreds of people who were using more PEDs than any Olympic-caliber athlete.</p>
<p>It takes infinitely more than anabolic steroids and performance enhancing drugs to make an elite athlete. A chemist has never created a drug that could remotely accomplish such a feat and most likely never will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.marksdailyapple.com/should-we-allow-drugs-in-sports/#comment-110449</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 04:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksdailyapple.com/?p=1237#comment-110449</guid>
		<description>Mark, great article.  What is your opinion with regard to time off at the end of a racing/training season.   Timothy Noakes believes that 2 months a year, with no athletic training is the correct way. Just to heal all the nicks, strains, niggles. etc. I have been taking 4 weeks off, but then an injury or illness gives me the other 4 weeks anyway. Thank you. Greg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, great article.  What is your opinion with regard to time off at the end of a racing/training season.   Timothy Noakes believes that 2 months a year, with no athletic training is the correct way. Just to heal all the nicks, strains, niggles. etc. I have been taking 4 weeks off, but then an injury or illness gives me the other 4 weeks anyway. Thank you. Greg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Sisson</title>
		<link>http://www.marksdailyapple.com/should-we-allow-drugs-in-sports/#comment-107180</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sisson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksdailyapple.com/?p=1237#comment-107180</guid>
		<description>Josh, the amount of rest you need is dependant upon the work load. One day a week of rest sounds fine for what you&#039;ve described, but two day soff wouldn&#039;t set you back in your training either.

As for fiber in the diet, it is over-hyped by the media. We don&#039;t actually need that much fiber, beyond what we get from consuming a few fruits and vegetables each day and provided we don&#039;t consume processed foods. The notion that we need &quot;whole grains&quot; for the fiber effect is total BS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh, the amount of rest you need is dependant upon the work load. One day a week of rest sounds fine for what you&#8217;ve described, but two day soff wouldn&#8217;t set you back in your training either.</p>
<p>As for fiber in the diet, it is over-hyped by the media. We don&#8217;t actually need that much fiber, beyond what we get from consuming a few fruits and vegetables each day and provided we don&#8217;t consume processed foods. The notion that we need &#8220;whole grains&#8221; for the fiber effect is total BS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.marksdailyapple.com/should-we-allow-drugs-in-sports/#comment-107041</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marksdailyapple.com/?p=1237#comment-107041</guid>
		<description>Hi Again,

Back to Mark&#039;s suggestion that athletes should be allowed to use medication to ensure they get the maximum benefit from training or minimise the damage, let me give you a very pertinent example - the Tour de France. Under TdF rules, asthmatics certified by their doctors are permitted to take certain substances which for non-asthmatics could be considered as performance-enhancing. Guess what - over 25% of all TdF cyclists are certified asthmatics !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Again,</p>
<p>Back to Mark&#8217;s suggestion that athletes should be allowed to use medication to ensure they get the maximum benefit from training or minimise the damage, let me give you a very pertinent example &#8211; the Tour de France. Under TdF rules, asthmatics certified by their doctors are permitted to take certain substances which for non-asthmatics could be considered as performance-enhancing. Guess what &#8211; over 25% of all TdF cyclists are certified asthmatics !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->