Comments on: Law Would Prohibit Restaurants from Serving Obese Patrons http://www.marksdailyapple.com/mississippi-overweight-restaurant-patrons/ Serving up health and fitness insights (daily, of course) with a side of irreverence. Fri, 04 Jul 2008 06:40:06 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Pam Wright http://www.marksdailyapple.com/mississippi-overweight-restaurant-patrons/#comment-81162 Pam Wright Tue, 27 May 2008 22:45:45 +0000 http://www.marksdailyapple.com/mississippi-overweight-restaurant-patrons/#comment-81162 If anyone in there right mind is supporting this has got to be out of there mind. Have you forgotten which country you live in? The freakin U.S.of A. HELLO!!! The land of the free. We practice the right of freedom and that includes the right to eat where we want and how much we want. Who in there right mind has the authority to decide whether to serve food which we are going to PAY for, to someone whom they think they are obese. By what guidelines? Unless you have a license to practice medicine,I would rethink this ban. It sounds like the people proposing this have a death wish. If anyone in there right mind is supporting this
has got to be out of there mind. Have you forgotten which country you live in? The freakin U.S.of A. HELLO!!! The land of the free. We practice the right of freedom and that includes the right to eat where we want and how much we want. Who in there right mind has the authority to decide whether to serve food which we are going to PAY for, to someone whom they think they are obese. By what guidelines? Unless you have a license to practice medicine,I would rethink this ban. It sounds like the people proposing this have a death wish.

]]> By: Mark’s Daily Apple » Blog Archive » Higher Cancer Risk if Your Fat http://www.marksdailyapple.com/mississippi-overweight-restaurant-patrons/#comment-30243 Mark’s Daily Apple » Blog Archive » Higher Cancer Risk if Your Fat Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:56:53 +0000 http://www.marksdailyapple.com/mississippi-overweight-restaurant-patrons/#comment-30243 [...] week we brought you news of the proposed law in Mississippi that would ban restaurants from serving obese people. As [...] [...] week we brought you news of the proposed law in Mississippi that would ban restaurants from serving obese people. As [...]

]]> By: Mark’s Daily Apple » Blog Archive » Carl’s Jr. Can’t Be Stopped!!! http://www.marksdailyapple.com/mississippi-overweight-restaurant-patrons/#comment-29889 Mark’s Daily Apple » Blog Archive » Carl’s Jr. Can’t Be Stopped!!! Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:43:05 +0000 http://www.marksdailyapple.com/mississippi-overweight-restaurant-patrons/#comment-29889 [...] legislature thought such desperate measures were called for when they suggested restaurants prohibit serving obese [...] [...] legislature thought such desperate measures were called for when they suggested restaurants prohibit serving obese [...]

]]> By: Frank http://www.marksdailyapple.com/mississippi-overweight-restaurant-patrons/#comment-29369 Frank Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:03:01 +0000 http://www.marksdailyapple.com/mississippi-overweight-restaurant-patrons/#comment-29369 I think what they mean is that usually physicians hold a lot of weight when it comes to their opinion about health matters. Despite the fact that physicians agreed it was preposterous the politicians still went ahead with it. I think what they mean is that usually physicians hold a lot of weight when it comes to their opinion about health matters. Despite the fact that physicians agreed it was preposterous the politicians still went ahead with it.

]]> By: Migraineur http://www.marksdailyapple.com/mississippi-overweight-restaurant-patrons/#comment-29365 Migraineur Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:38:01 +0000 http://www.marksdailyapple.com/mississippi-overweight-restaurant-patrons/#comment-29365 "What was perhaps most disconcerting, however, is that even physicians agreed that the bill was preposterous!" Why is that disconcerting, exactly? “What was perhaps most disconcerting, however, is that even physicians agreed that the bill was preposterous!”

Why is that disconcerting, exactly?

]]>