Marks Daily Apple
Serving up health and fitness insights (daily, of course) with a side of irreverence.
3 Jun

Makes My Blood Boil

blood boilI had a medical scare two weeks ago that shook me up quite a bit. No, not because there was anything wrong with me, but because if I had been someone else and didn’t know what I know, I might be suffering the side effects of blood pressure meds as I write this today. And that’s a slippery slope I never want to ride. Yet this scenario plays out in most doctors’ offices every day.

I had a slight skin thingy on my always-in-the-sun arm. I thought it might be prudent to get it checked out, and I had an hour before my next meeting, so I took an impromptu opening in my doctor’s schedule to have him take a look. In my naïveté, I thought I could waltz in, have him scan it for 15 seconds and send me home with a clean bill of health and a xylitol lollipop. But this being LA and that being a doctor’s office and needing to follow protocol (so as not to get sued for malpractice AND to be able to bill me full pop), the nurse ushered me into a waiting room and took my weight (still 165), height (still 5’10”) and my blood pressure, which I had no reason to suspect had changed since I qualified for the lowest rates possible on my in-home life insurance physical just a few years ago. It had been 122/82 that day. Cha ching.

Imagine, then, my mortification when the nurse casually announced that my BP was 140/100.

Now, in the not-too-distant olden days, if you were 100 plus your age for systolic (the first number) you were considered to have normal BP. Then the powers that be started to opine that 120 over 80 was more normal and that 140 over 90 was hypertensive. Recently, the medical industry (always looking for a way to get you medicated) has started to suggest that a “normal” 120/80 is in fact “pre-hypertensive.” Hey, the more drugs they can sell to healthy people the faster our economy will turn around, right? So at 140/100 I was a little taken aback. I sat there for ten more minutes waiting and going over all the possibilities in my mind: jet lag? (I had just gotten back from NYC the day before and hadn’t slept well), dehydration? (as you know, I don’t drink much water), white coat syndrome? (being in a doctor’s office automatically jacks up some peoples’ BP as much as 20 points), stress? (yeah, I do have stress, and I don’t handle it like I should). All these things can artificially elevate BP. I was going through all the other impossible reasons why I might test high when the doctor strode in, looked at my arm for five seconds and proclaimed the skin thingy nothing. Then he looked at my chart.

“Your blood pressure is a bit high” he says, with eyebrows raised behind his glasses.

“Yeah,” I respond, “let’s check it again, because I don’t believe it.”

So he checks it himself, and now it’s 140 over 101. He says, “ordinarily, because I am big on prevention, I would start you on medication right away, but you look pretty healthy, so let’s check it again here in three weeks, and if it’s still in this range, I’ll prescribe something. Meanwhile, try to eat better and cut back on salt. And maybe we should schedule you for a complete physical.” Well. OK, then. That’s sound advice. He was in and out in six minutes, too. Good thing he didn’t check the BP one more time, because it would likely have been 170/130 after that comment.

I had never really thought much about my own blood pressure until that moment. I’ve always had impressive stats when it comes to heart rate, BP, blood sugar, cholesterol and all the other markers we/they use. Not that I get tested much, because I try to stay away from doctors. Hey, I’m Primal. Why shouldn’t I? But something was wrong here and I needed to take control.

I decided it was time for another “experiment of one.” I drove down the street to CVS and, after a brief seminar on the benefits of all the available blood pressure monitors, wound up buying one of the coolest little home-testing devices I’ve ever seen. It’s an Omron 711-DLX with a pressure cuff that inflates automatically and outputs a big-ass digital reading every time. They say it’s as accurate (or more so) than a nurse or doctor. Consumer Reports rated it number one.

Over the next six days, I tested my blood pressure during 10 different sessions under various circumstances. At each session, I performed and recorded five tests, with about two minutes rest between tests. So the total number of “data points” I got was 50. Here is a brief summary of my results:

  1. In 50 readings, there were no repeats. Every single reading was unique. Not once was my blood pressure repeatable from one test to another or one day to another. I think that defies even common laws of probability.
  2. I never got up to 140/100 in any of my tests. The closest I got was the very first test I did the following morning (which was closest to when I had left the doc’s office). That was a single first reading of 133/92. But even then, my five-test-average for that session was 128/90 with a low of 127/83.
  3. That same night, after dinner (including two glasses of wine) I recorded a low reading of 102/66 and a five-reading average of 108/66! So in one 28 hour period, I had gone from “mild stage-1, give’em drugs” to “low-normal.”  That’s a huge variation.
  4. Almost invariably, the first reading in any session was the highest of the five tests. So if you throw that first one out, the average drops even more. I didn’t, though.
  5. Over the next several days, I tried to look for patterns. The closest I got was that in the evening I generally settle at around 110/67. I guess dinner is relaxing. Otherwise I’m up at times and down at times.

If you plot my results, they are all over the place. It’s a scattergram that only remotely correlates to time of day and/or circumstance. It turns out that blood pressure in most people (as in me) is a very dynamic metric. One solitary reading is about as useful for diagnosing hypertension as one piano note is for identifying a song. Yet, historically, the medical profession has recommended you test for BP once a year, and as recently as 2004 Dr.  William M. Tierney concluded that “a single elevated blood pressure reading – particularly an elevated systolic reading – is a reliable predictor of future problems and should not be dismissed as a fluke.” Start the drugs, nurse.

It’s only now beginning to change. Here’s a very cool article well worth the read. In it Dr. Norman M. Kaplan admits, “Of all the procedures done in a doctor’s office, measurement of blood pressure is usually the least well performed but has the most important implications for the care of the patient.” It also acknowledges that readings in doctors’ offices are notoriously bad and should not form the basis for a diagnosis, and further suggests multiple readings in the home throughout the day as the only reliable method.

Here’s what I know: The body is constantly seeking homeostasis and must make adjustments to blood pressure, heart rate, breathing, immune function, cholesterol and a hundred other parameters literally minute by minute, day-to-day based on input from you. Every time you take a bite of food, move around, decide to sleep or not, react to stress or perform any number of other normal human functions, hormonal and gene signals are sent to readjust and bring you back into balance. As long as you are eating well (Primally), exercising moderately and controlling stress, there’s a very good chance your blood pressure will be exactly where it needs to be. I was 140/100 for a reason that day. Just like I was 102/66 a day later for a different reason. Not that it had a chance in hell of happening, but what makes me sick is the idea that I might have been prescribed a diuretic and/or an ACE inhibitor to artificially lower my blood pressure had I been someone else and just accepted the good doctor’s advice without truly investigating this. And believe me, this happens every day in doctor’s offices throughout the country. Based on a government medical committee assessment that 120/80 (formerly normal) is now “pre-hypertensive,” some 50 million Americans are in line to be on blood pressure lowering meds. Some might actually benefit. Most would be far better off living Primally and letting the body do what it needs to do naturally to achieve balance.

Of course, all this begs the next question: I’m 8% body fat…does that make me “pre-obese”?

You want comments? We got comments:

Imagine you’re George Clooney. Take a moment to admire your grooming and wit. Okay, now imagine someone walks up to you and asks, “What’s your name?” You say, “I’m George Clooney.” Or maybe you say, “I’m the Clooninator!” You don’t say “I’m George of George Clooney Sells Movies Blog” and you certainly don’t say, “I’m Clooney Weight Loss Plan”. So while spam is technically meat, it ain’t anywhere near Primal. Please nickname yourself something your friends would call you.

  1. These things are best taken as averages across a large time period, as you did. Unfortunately, the truth is that most people won’t take the time to monitor thwie health that closely.

    Greg at Live Fit wrote on June 3rd, 2009
  2. Consider magnesium deficiency if you have high blood pressure. With the poor quality of our soils these days many people are deficient. It takes awhile to get your body stores replenished but it can help. Guess what they give you through an iv in a hospital if your blood pressure is critically high. Magnesium! Taking pills is a slower but equally effective way to replenish. Not a cure all for everyone, but worth a consideration. There is no good way to measure it in the blood though, so be wary if someone tries to sell you on a blood test.

    Rodney wrote on June 3rd, 2009
  3. Great article! I also bought the Omron machine a few years ago. I had tested my BP at a couple of grocery stores, and was getting numbers anywhere from 152/100 to 110/65. Testing at home, I came up with an average of about 114/70 HR 60 – the same as it has been for the last 20 years. Moral to the story: Don’t trust that one time at the doctor’s office, and don’t use the BP machines at the store!

    Theresa wrote on June 3rd, 2009
  4. I had one BP reading of 110/100. Is this number even possible?

    Sonagi wrote on June 3rd, 2009
    • Ya it is, and it’s not good. Heart failure… get it check out

      Kristina wrote on November 14th, 2009
  5. Mark…I think you should have another doctor check the thingy on your arm.

    SCB wrote on June 3rd, 2009
  6. I have been lurking on this site for a year now & have avidly read everything that Mark has put out. I thank him for his tireless questions & especially for his book which I finished this past weekend. I agree with everything in it and wish that more people would subscribe to even a small percentage of what he recommends. I am writing into this forum because I am one of those “health practitioners” that everyone seems to be demonising in the current posts.

    Mark has taken a very sensible approach to this situation & I applaud his random thoughts on the subject. I think he is fair & balanced. What people need to realise is that the majority of doctors (I am a board certified family practitioner & therefore in the front line of blood pressure control)are faced with multiple dilemmas when seeing people with high blood pressures. Firstly, in answer to those people who were put on meds after one reading that is not the usual recommendation. Most doctors will get at least 2 readings unless the readings is so high that they think there is imminent danger to the patient. Mark would not have been diagnosed with Hypertension, but rather “Elevated blood pressure, without diagnosis of hypertension” & most guidelines would recommend getting at least 3 elevated readings on separate occasions before labelling someone as hypertensive. Secondly, most doctors will tell you to start with diet & exercise (although as most people reading the PB will atest to, those conventional guidelines are based on faulty food pyramids, etc). I almost beg my patients not to “make me” diagnose them with hypertension & especially diabetes as they usually can do far more good with diet & exercise than with medication.

    Unfortunately most people want nothing to do with diet & exercise & most doctors are so jaded from trying to discuss this with patients that they throw in the towel before they have even started trying to get people to change their lifestyle. If at least 10% of my patients followed dietary recommendations or bought the books I recommend (Paleo, Protein Power Plan, & now PB) I would be extremely happy. As it is that number is probably less than 5%. Most doctors don’t try because insurance companies do not pay you to educate patients about these things. That is not an excuse but unfortunately it is one of the greatest failings of our health care system. We simply cannot get enough med school grads to go into family med or IM at the moment. We therefore have far too many specialists who are getting paid for doing procedures (but that is another discussion).

    Lastly, what most people don’t know is that doctors are now being told that they will get paid for “performance”. This is the government’s way (with Medicare) of supposedly “ensuring” that people have their blood sugar, blood pressure & cholesterol at “acceptable levels”. Unfortunately the onus is being placed on the physicians with the carrot being a bonus at the end of the year. The potential stick in the future will be payment withheld for poor control. What is a physician to do if the patient has an elevated BP & does not check their readings, lose weight, fill their prescriptions in a timely manner, etc? The answer is generally add more medication to get the number down. It is a recipe for disaster & most patients are not even aware of it & the government guidelines are not something your family doc can control.

    Please talk to your family doctor about what you can do rather than go on medication. If they are not receptive find another one who will talk with you (preferably someone who is familiar with PB or at least open minded about various diets). Even better still follow the PB & then go back & show him/her how well it works. They might be more receptive to looking into it. Mark gives doctors a fair shake in his book by admitting that we are trained to treat, not prevent diseases(especially the specialists). Unfortunately not enough patients are diligent enough about their own health & especially BP. If it is elevated check it at home & in a variety of circumstances. If it is above 140/90 on a regular basis (more than half the time) you most likely have problems & need to find a solution. And yes, try diet & exercise first before going to meds. Having said that, after smoking, high blood pressure is going to be the number one cause of heart attacks & strokes in the USA (the number 1 & 2 killers) & so if your doctor is worried about yours he is actually showing appropriate concern. How you decide to address that with him/her should be a team decision.

    Thanks again for a great job Mark. I have recommended your book & blog to a lot of patients already.

    glmd wrote on June 3rd, 2009
    • What a great response. Everyone read it.

      Jeff wrote on June 3rd, 2009
  7. With all the lousy side effects from those stupid drugs, people would probably be better off living with chronic high blood pressure anyway. And like you say, most people who’ve been diagnosed with it don’t even have it… AND the medical establishment has pushed down the “healthy” levels over time which makes it even more ridiculous and pointless to base such a serious diagnosis on only a small number of tests.

    My paternal grandmother probably had BP through the roof… she was always worrying and fretting about something or other. On the other hand she ate things like codfish heads and greens and carrots and zucchini every day. No junk at all, and she lived to be 96—almost entirely self-sufficient up until the last few months of her life.

    Candace wrote on June 3rd, 2009
    • I’ve known people like your grandmother, who should have been dead at 50 and then prove everybody wrong by making to 90. The medical profession needs to understand that people are more than just numbers.

      Shary wrote on June 5th, 2012
  8. I agreee with everyone here, BUT… maybe Mark does have a bp problem inspite of his great diet? My bp is nearly always 90/60 ish… even when I had to wait for ever in a waiting room with all my children. Once, when very pregnant and under much stress, it went up to 120/80. Not saying meds are the answer… just that there may be a problem.
    Conversely, we have naturally high cholesterol in my family, despite being normal weight and active. I have recently stopped taking my statin and will monitor my status (via diet improvement)…but my mom had two heart attacks at 50 and 52… and I don’t want to be in the same boat.

    Milemom wrote on June 3rd, 2009
  9. Mark I think the massive amount of comments is a testament of how much we value your life.

    I have the highest respect for the medical profession. But I am also aware of it’s limitations.

    In some cases, expecting a Doctor to question standard procedures is equal to asking a car mechanic about thermodynamics.

    Medicine is, for the most part, empirical.

    SerialSinner wrote on June 3rd, 2009
  10. It is a dirty little secret of the medical community that very few drs. or nurses take accurate BP. That is why many offices and hospitals have moved to the automated machines -which suck too btw! The other thing to be very wary of is the size of the cuff that they use. Use the standard cuff on someone with large-ish biceps and you get a much higher #. I almost bought myself BP meds that way as I am a short woman with thick arms! Grok would have thought I was hot!

    Licarrit wrote on June 3rd, 2009
  11. Duh Mark, you always hold your breath when getting a blood pressure check.

    I use Zen breathing every time I get checked and they always tell me the same thing…

    “Your blood pressure and heart rate are too low”.

    I happen to believe you thought your way into a higher number Mark on this one.

    George wrote on June 3rd, 2009
  12. I bet the Doctors wish we were all on statins. Don’t worry though, someday the medical community will come around and see things our way… :)

    “All great truths begin as blasphemies.”
    – George Bernard Shaw

    Ryan Robitaille wrote on June 3rd, 2009
  13. Mark, sounds like almost an identical experience I had a few years ago – right down to buying the home Omron BP toy. Same readings, and same variation in BP. Never quite made the link until recently that some doctors default solution is medication. I’m trusting them less and less these days.

    Andy wrote on June 3rd, 2009
  14. Hey guys, I’m another long time reader/first time poster….That’s quite the experience and commentary on the health care system in general. It really makes me think and second guess the opinions of people in positions of power who are supposed to know what is best…more than usual.

    It’s interesting that this was posted today seing as I had a blood pressure problem today. I’m a 20 year old male and I eat as Paleo as possible considering my living arrangements, which isn’t too far off. I’m also active (one of those Crossfit guys) and keep moving as much as possible.

    To my story…today I went to donate blood as I usually do, and I generally have a slightly higher than ‘normal’ systolic pressure and lower diastolic at around 135/60. When the nurse took my blood pressure today it was an astounding 118/40, which by their standards is too low of a diastolic to donate blood….this caught me off guard as to how I could possibly be so low. I looked a bit into hypotension and based on my age and diet the only thing I could really conclude is it being a side effect from the “cardiovascular shock” of my workout in the morning. I finished my workout at around 9 AM and had my blood pressure taken at 3 PM.

    I am still quite thrown off by the entire situation of having to LOW of a blood pressure. Is it possible that my body was still compensating for the stress on it’s system 6 hours later? Has anyone else heard of similar things?


    Matt wrote on June 3rd, 2009
  15. It seems so obvious now that you’ve written it, but I also have never thought to do repeated follow-up BP tests at home.

    My BP is always around 110/70 but I commonly speak with clients prescribed medicated for high BP and – although I intrinsically don’t trust the churn’n’burn approach of doctors – don’t feel confident enough in that area to try and give advice. Aside from real nutrition of course!

    Great tip, I’m going to be recommending that to everyone I talk to.

    Mark I’d love to see you write something on how to face-off against a doctor with a ‘high’ cholesterol black mark against you!

    Kat Eden wrote on June 4th, 2009
  16. Well, most doctors should take your lifestyle into consideration when prescribing drugs, moreso in BP cases. In most mediterranean countries (I live in Spain) a doctor will tell you that with a 140/80 BP reading you are perfectly fine. A “primal” dude is not the average Joe all these readings are based upon.

    Corcontas wrote on June 4th, 2009
  17. very informative, mark!
    I knew that one’s bp could vary throughout the day, but I didn’t know it could go up and down so much.
    in our house, everyone’s bp measuring master except for…

    Riceball wrote on June 4th, 2009
  18. You know sometimes blood pressure meds aren’t the worst thing…

    I’m 24, considered extremely fit, eating/living primal, limiting carb intake and am currently on a minimal dose ACE Inhibitor.

    I struggled for over 2 years trying to avoid BP meds and eventually gave in.
    I gave in because each day living with elevated blood pressure was doing myself great harm. I have a heart condition where the right-side of my heart is enlarged and merely having an elevated resting blood pressure contributes to muscular hypertrophy (further enlargement that’s supposed to be permanent).

    I have tried nearly everything to get it under control the natural way. The only thing that reliably kept my blood pressure in the “normal” range was severe calorie restriction and with this, quality of life diminished significantly.

    Whilst primal/paleo living has helped me gain a greater control of my health and taught me some amazing things about the human body, I find a combination of primal plus low dose BP meds the best for me.

    If you’re like me and do have to resort to BP meds, ACE inhibitors have a very good side effect profile and don’t cause your pulse rate to plunge (very important for an athelete). They also have have other benefits to the circulatory system and kidneys.

    Daniel wrote on June 4th, 2009
  19. I have to have my arm – resting on the arm of the chair and totally relaxed to have an accurate reading. Having my arm just hanging down at my side – or my trying to hold it ‘out’ raises my readings significantly.

    vickie wrote on June 4th, 2009
  20. I’ve just taken my BP with my electronic BP monitor in a sitting and lying (‘fundamental BP’) position. I get readings of 139/68 (HR 91 BPM) & 96/62 (HR 62 BPM) respectively!

    Alex wrote on June 4th, 2009
  21. Mark – a very timely article. Someone I know is currently jumping through all kinds of hoops on the basis of such a reading by a doctor – I think I shall direct her at your story. It might provide some perspective.

    Methuselah - Pay Now Live Later wrote on June 4th, 2009
  22. When my father-in-law was diagnosed with diabetes they put him on BP meds even though his BP was fine. Their rational was that diabetes can lead to BP problems, so they wanted him to be on BP meds “just in case”.

    After a few weeks he started having dizziness and fainting spells. They did all kinds of tests to figure out what the problem was, they even talked about putting in a stent thinking there was some type of blockage that was restricting blood flow.

    EVENTUALLY they figured out it might be the BP meds. He stopped taking them and guess what? No more dizziness or fainting spells!

    CavemanNaoh wrote on June 4th, 2009
  23. Mark,

    What a story – WOW!

    I guess you are part of the lucky few who is a little more aware than most ordinary people.

    This is an extremely detailed account of your whole “blod pressure” store and it’s great that you’re are willing to share it with us!

    Eat Smart Age Smart wrote on June 4th, 2009
  24. Mark:

    I’m a regular at Track Your Plaque, Dr. William Davis’ site. What you describe is something you should be concerned about. I think glmid (the family doc who responded a few posts above) has the right approach for most of his patients, but I want to share with you some things you should be concerned about:

    1. That you were unable to obtain the same results with multiple readings is NOT surprising and it is completely and utterly normal. BP varies throughout the day and often minute to minute.

    2. If you do not adopt a proper posture for the test, you will obtain inaccurate results. What’s a proper posture? You can either be sitting, lying down, standing, it doesn’t matter (whether you’re testing ambulatory BP or resting BP, you’ll obviously get different values, but the principles are the same). What is important is that you 1) always test in the same arm (usually the left will read a few mm of mercury higher than the right), and 2) always insure that your arm is level with your heart. If your arm is down by your side, or over your head you will get wildly different readings, no matter whether you’re using a manual sphygmomanometer or a digital device. If your arm is dropped below your heart, the pressures (both systolic and diastolic) will be higher; if your arm is raised higher than your heart, the pressures will be lower. Try it and see for yourself.

    3. If you are consistently getting readings at your docs office which are in the range of 140/100, that’s a pretty strong indication of hypertension, and it’s significant enough that you should pay carefule attention to it. Even in very fit athletes, hypertension can develop…in fact especially in endurance athletes.

    4. There is a phenomenon known as “athletes heart”, which is a slight thickening of the atrial or ventricular wall muscle, and a generalized enlargement of the atria and/or ventricles. If the condition persists untreated it can develop into a condition known as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. This frequently happens with endurance athletes (e.g., long distance cyclists, swimmers, marathoners or ultra-distance runners), but also occurs with athletes who engage in “quick busrt” sports, where shorter, but more intense efforts and more “fast twitch” muscles are involved (e.g., basketball, sprinting, tennis, etc.). Because the muscle walls thicken, this leads the heart to have to pump harder, increasing BP. This can have some long-term serious consequences and shouldn’t be ignored. Often there are no symptoms, but over time, it is a leading cause of atherosclerosis, heart disease, plaque formation and deposition in arterial walls, MI, stroke and in some cases heart failure. In particular, people with cardiac hypertrophy (enlargement of the heart) are at particular risk for developing heart failure. What’s heart failure? Again, let’s talk about the heart muscle thickening and becoming enlarged– the heart has to pump harder to move the same amount of blood, even at rest (hence the increased pressure). Eventually the heart muscle weakens from the increased workload, and as it weakens, it has to work harder and harder to move the same amount of blood. Eventually the muscles become unable to properly contract sufficiently, and you wind up with a big, floppy heart that is no longer able to efficiently pump blood, leading to a very unpleasant result, i.e., lack of oxygen and ultimately death.

    I am by no means suggesting that Mark’s situation will lead to any of this parade of horribles, but having read all of the postings which precede mine, with the exception of a few people who are knowledgeable about the risks and dangers of high BP, even transitory BP, it is just shocking the level of ignorance that people have about high blood pressure and what values are really “healthy” levels for systolic and diastolic pressures. I don’t mean any of you all are “ignorant” but the level of misunderstanding about BP is dismaying, as equally dismaying as what BP meds are, what they do, and how they work to reduce the risk of coronary disease, atheroclerosis, blindness, glaucoma, kidney failure and a whole host of horribles that are directly caused by untreated high blood pressures.

    Mark is right to be concerned. He’s also right to have his BP checked again by his doctor.

    The family practitioner above is also right that anyone who demonstrates the sorts of readings that Mark did at the doctor’s office, should be first advised to try to control BP through diet, exercise and TLC (therapuetic lifestyle changes) before resorting to meds. But if meds are in the cards, there are certainly worse fates than taking one or two meds each day before breakfast. Going blind, having kidney failure (high BP can very badly damage the sensitive microvasculature of the eyes, kidneys, and other organs), etc., are all worse than taking a couple of pills every day.

    Weight loss, diet, exercise, all can help, but sometimes they can be counter-productive too, particularly if when one is exercising their BP rises to levels which are dangerously high (something you would typically not know unless you underwent exercise stress testing at a lab or at a doctor’s office).

    I point this out not to shock or scare anyone, including Mark. But that said, 140/100 is, for someone as fit as he is, an indication of something going on…perhaps an infection or some chronic inflammation, stress, or something….but it’s certainly enough to get one’s attention, and paying attention to it and working with your doctor is really the way to go. Anyone who advises you to ignore a doctor’s advice about repeatedly high BP readings is simply wrong.

    I appreciate your philosophy is to let the body primally take care of itself and achieve balance. But sometimes our bodies just refuse to do that, despite our best intentions….even our ancestors developed illnesses and conditions which overwhelmed the natural systems and caused the body to break down and deteriorate and ultimately all of our ancestors became…well, ancestors. We will too. We can’t stop time’s ultimate effects…maybe we can slow things down and lead a healthy, productive life…but ultimately all of us will need to resort to a supplement, a drug, or some form of therapy to deal with something we didn’t anticipate. Taking an ACE or and ARB or a diuretic isn’t the end of life, and depending on where one’s condition is and how serious the condition is, it’s better than the alternatives of untreated high BP.

    Anyway, keep up the good work Mark, but don’t underestimate the importance of good BP control, and by that I mean BP well below 120/80, optimally between 100 to 110 systolic and 60-70 diastolic.

    Jerry wrote on June 4th, 2009
  25. Mark…I always have had high blood pressure in a doctors office since I was 19 it was 160/100..the doctors always put it down to white coat syndrome…anyway when I was 30 he said he should do some detailed tests to make sure…so I had a choice go for 24 hour monitoring or buy a bp monitor like you did…. I bought it and always gor resukts like 105/80…so The doctor wanted to check it against his…I go to the office and he uses his equipment bam I have a high reading….I use use my machine wam…normal reading…the doctor says my BP monitor is probably not working….thenhe says let him use it…guess what…I get a high reading…everytime I used my BP device for myself I get a normal reading.. reading was normal…whenever he used my machine I get a high reading…when I turned 40 apparently my white coat syndrome has disappered as I get normal readings now

    William wrote on June 5th, 2009
  26. Why not show the graph of the data?

    sean wrote on June 5th, 2009
  27. Hey Mark my BP was always alittle elevated but got as high as 140/110.

    I need a change the DR immediately tried putting me on meds. I chose diet and exercise. Lost 30 pounds feel great and my bp is always changing but avg 120’s over the 80’s Great in my book .

    Love the article Mark keep up the good work. I wanted to apply for your food blogger position but my cooking is great food for me.

    Steve wrote on June 5th, 2009
  28. Mark, here’s some data showing how BP varies over time. I’ve recorded my BP at breakfast every day for the past 3 years. Here are the averages and the standard deviations for that data set.

    count: 1061
    mean: 114
    std dev: 9.1
    max: 141
    min: 89

    These were all taken at the time of day when blood pressure tends to be lowest, and there isn’t much of a trend over that time, but there is considerable scatter.

    I also have tracked BP during the day on about 20 days during the same time period. Generally BP increases as the day goes on. Here’s the summary of that data.

    count: 225
    mean: 122
    std dev: 11.3
    max: 162
    min: 96

    This shows even more scatter. I typically show 10-20 points higher in the doctor’s office than at home, frequently above 140. I have been able to avoid medication by showing him my long-term charts and by showing him that my Omron cuff compares closely to his sphygmomanometer readings.

    I think to really get a handle on your blood pressure you need to get your own meter and use it frequently.

    Harry wrote on June 5th, 2009
  29. One other thing, Mark. You should have a dermatologist look at your arm. My GP didn’t think a sore spot on my skin that hadn’t healed in several weeks was a problem, but my Dermatologist took one look and identified it as a basal cell carcinoma, which was verified on biopsy after he removed it.

    Harry wrote on June 5th, 2009
  30. I like how the nurse mentioned how wrong you were because medicing shows that MAINTAINING a blood pressure that high is unhealthy… when you weren’t maintaining it.

    I had a similar problem, by BP always seems to be high at the doc’s but normal at home. My conclusion: it’s always so frickin cold at the doctor’s office, so I assume its because my body is trying to warm up.

    Amanda K wrote on June 6th, 2009
  31. I also had a wacky BP reading at the doctor’s office by the nurse. Read 150/95 ouch!! When measuring at home I am usually in the range of 110/75. The doctor came in and looked at the recorded reading, looked at me (okay I’m not the smallest sprout in the garden), got a larger cuff and presto I’m in the healthy range again.

    pfair143 wrote on June 7th, 2009
  32. I was pretty irritated once at a doctor’s office… BEFORE she even took my blood pressure, the nurse was handing me pamphlets about avoiding the dangers of high blood pressure and cholesterol. Why? Because she looked at me and could see I was overweight. Yet, my blood pressure was as normal as normal gets… and my cholesterol is just fine as well.

    Cynthia wrote on June 7th, 2009
  33. My mother consulted a doctor and gave her medicines for a high blood pressure and he also added that she may chew garlic if she will have an increase in blood pressure. Why is it?

    Nick Soma wrote on June 7th, 2009
  34. When getting my BP taken I like to meditate while they’re doing it. Low results every time. If you don’t know how to mediate you should be learning anyway.

    Markus wrote on June 11th, 2009
  35. Some doctors are obviously more clueful than others (see above).

    My BP started showing episodically high years ago but nothing was done other than monitoring until it went up and stayed up AND was tested sitting, standing, lying down and after ten minutes relaxation. Then and only then I was prescribed an ARB.

    I use an Omron wrist meter which like you shows considerable variation but mostly around a useful level nowadays. After a high reading from the nurse I was lent a 24 hour monitor (I suspect they disbelived my own readings) and this showed exactly the same thing, quite a range of variation around an average of 120/85 or so.

    My BP turns out NOT to be sodium sensitive (not uncommon) and slightly potassium sensitive (potassium reduces it). But that doctor wasn’t entirely clueful, he put me on the standard high carb low fat diet and my BP is VERY carb sensitive (familial diabetes/metabolic syndrome) in no time it was heading north of 150/95.

    Low carbing dropped it to the extent that my new GP discussed stopping the meds, but since ACE and ARBs have kidney protective and other benefits we decided to keep on with them. Five years later and it’s starting to increase again. But then I’m five years older. The average is creeping up but the variation appears to be in a smaller range.

    Mother is tiny and now 93 so not as fit and active as she used to was, she’s had hypertension for about 50 years now and her BP has fallen to the extent she has had her meds reduced several times: another example of familial factors and things not going the way tradition expects, maybe she’s getting better at not expressing the genes while I’m getting worse.

    Trinkwasser wrote on June 22nd, 2009
  36. Great article Mark, the only reason I guessed your body fat a 8.1% is because I took my a few weeks ago and it read 21.4 and that was after I lost 30lbs and have been eating good (primal) for 3 months. I am 6’2 medium to large build and 210. It told me I had 174.6 lbs of muscle and 40 or more lbs of fat. I was worried I looked good and thought “Boy I really need to lose alot of fat” Anyways, liked the article. Merry Christmas from Hamilton, Mi. Dan

    Dan Lange wrote on December 23rd, 2009
  37. It’s bad when medicine strays from science.

    Glenn Dixon wrote on December 24th, 2009
  38. To the nurse practitioner, I don’t think he was bad mouthing the medical profession as much as he was demonstrating that when a patient takes an interest in his care, he can take the information given by his physician and make his OWN decisions. It is easy for a physician to say your have high BP and we need to treat it, even if there was a reading to justify it at the time. When people realize that you are paying your physician for their medical opinion, we will all be better off. It is very difficult to find a physician that is willing to spend any time with you as a patient, and hence where the quickie diagnosis lies. NP usually have more time with the patient, but I am sorry to say that if I am paying the bill, I want to see an internal medicine physician and not a nurse practioner. Do you ever wonder why YOU end up treating all of the indigent/welfare cases?

    robby69 wrote on June 5th, 2010

Leave a Reply

If you'd like to add an avatar to all of your comments click here!

© 2016 Mark's Daily Apple

Subscribe to the Newsletter and Get a Free Copy
of Mark Sisson's Fitness eBook and more!