Marks Daily Apple
Serving up health and fitness insights (daily, of course) with a side of irreverence.
30 Apr

The Heparin Controversy

heparinThis morning’s New York Times reports that the FDA is now echoing what many scientists and industry experts have been saying for weeks: the contaminated stores of heparin that have been associated with 81 deaths and 785 severe allergic reactions in the U.S. was likely adulterated on purpose. In March, the FDA issued a major recall of heparin following increasing reports of adverse reactions and deaths connected with the drug.

Tests have shown that heparin components made by a company in China (Changzhou SPL) were contaminated by a manipulated form of a dietary supplement, oversulfated chondroitin sulfate. Because the cheaper additive resembles heparin, routine screening didn’t reveal the contamination. Contaminants comprised up to a third of some heparin samples that were tested. Dr. Janet Woodcock, director of the Food and Drug Administration’s drug center explained, “[I]t does strain one’s credulity to suggest that might have been done accidentally.”

Heparin is a blood thinner used in dialysis, heart surgery and other medical treatments. Components, known as active pharmaceutical ingredients or APIs, of the drug were made by the Chinese company and then used by Baxter International to manufacture the final product.

Earlier this week family members whose loved ones had died after receiving the drug spoke before a Congressional subcommittee, as did FDA officials and leaders of Baxter International, who support the claim that the heparin ingredient was deliberately contaminated.

The incident has caused a major uproar on Capitol Hill with members bearing their teeth for cameras. As recent commentary in the New England Journal of Medicine notes, the target of their ire is the FDA, the federal agency in charge of regulating “$1 trillion of consumer products or 25% of the U.S. consumer economy” with a budget of “$1.57 billion — less than 75% of the budget for the school district in its home county in Maryland.” The FDA doesn’t have anywhere in the ball park enough to cover the inspection needs of today’s global marketplace. At best, the agency has the manpower and funding to inspect 7% of foreign drug/API manufacturers. Despite switching to a risk-based model to prioritize inspections, the inspection system is fraught with issues, including an inability to perform inspections without notification and limitations in inspection thoroughness because of inadequate translation services.

While the FDA is being grilled over hot coals, little if any complaint is being directed at Baxter International itself, the company that outsourced the production of the heparin components in order to enhance its profit and not conduct its own inspections to ensure safe manufacturing practices. Before the anti-capitalist accusations start slinging our way, it’s important to note that we have nothing against companies making money. (Shouldn’t that be obvious?) But the question of the day is who will protect consumers from the deleterious effects of adulterated drugs? Call us what you will, but we believe people should be able to take the drugs they need without wondering if they’re getting what the label says they’re getting or if they’re playing a medical version of Russian roulette.

And as for the argument that the companies will choose to ensure safe practices in order to avoid lawsuit? Well, the heparin controversy is case in point to show companies don’t always operate on those principles. Some do, some don’t. And it may only get worse. As another commentary from last week’s NEJM noted, this February the Supreme Court ruled that FDA approval of medical devices “precludes lawsuits brought by patients against the manufacturer over adverse events in state courts.” As a result of this ruling, patients cannot bring a lawsuit (or truly expect to win one anyway) when harmed by a medical device that the FDA has previously certified as “generally safe and effective.” The Supreme Court will hear a “similar case” regarding pharmaceuticals later this year. This should get interesting.

We aren’t, are not, in no way, shape or form, arguing against a free market. But the “market,” as we know, serves people – mothers, fathers, kids, grandparents, neighbors and friends. We simply can’t have it every way: no inspection responsibility for manufacturers, no real money or authority for a federal regulation agency, and (potentially, later this year) no recourse for patients and their families.

With more than 80% of drugs or pharmaceutical components now made in other countries (primarily China and India) the problem isn’t going to magically dissipate into the atmosphere (although it might disappear into the back pages of newspapers for a while as other events grab the media’s attention). Fixing this debacle takes some hard questioning about how we want our system to operate. The question becomes: who should we trust as we swallow that prescription? Bottom’s up!

Tell us what you think.

flippy rice Flickr Photo (CC)

Further Reading:

Deconstructing Healthcare in America – A Modest Proposal

Where Have All the Studies Gone?

Pharmalot: Should Drugs Carry Country of Origin Labels?

Subscribe to Mark’s Daily Apple feeds

Sponsor note:
This post was brought to you by the Damage Control Master Formula, independently proven as the most comprehensive high-potency antioxidant multivitamin available anywhere. With the highest antioxidant per dollar value and a complete anti-aging, stress, and cognition profile, the Master Formula is truly the only multivitamin supplement you will ever need. Toss out the drawers full of dozens of different supplements with questionable potency and efficacy and experience the proven Damage Control difference!

Related Posts...

You want comments? We got comments:

Imagine you’re George Clooney. Take a moment to admire your grooming and wit. Okay, now imagine someone walks up to you and asks, “What’s your name?” You say, “I’m George Clooney.” Or maybe you say, “I’m the Clooninator!” You don’t say “I’m George of George Clooney Sells Movies Blog” and you certainly don’t say, “I’m Clooney Weight Loss Plan”. So while spam is technically meat, it ain’t anywhere near Primal. Please nickname yourself something your friends would call you.

  1. This sounds like an act of war.

    Roger wrote on April 30th, 2008
  2. I think it’s just the mark of reprehensible, brazen greed. If the contaminant was cheaper, it’s more money in the Chinese company’s pocket. Kind of like the pet food issue a year or so ago.

    Jen wrote on April 30th, 2008
  3. Pet food, children’s toys (lead paint), and it seems there were other issues with stuff coming out of China. When is it going to end? One more reason to attain health and avoid medications if you can!

    Nancy S wrote on April 30th, 2008
  4. Yet another reason to just stay healthy in the first place, and avoid taking any type of prescription drug. I don’t trust any of them, whether they come from the US, China, or Jupiter.

    I take a birth control pill everyday, and usually 1 caffeine pill (not a coffee person), and the sporadic naproxen sodium, but all of those things are not necessary for me to stay alive. If I HAD to take a pill to survive I’d be way more freaked out than I already am.

    Heather wrote on April 30th, 2008
  5. Heather, your opinions are really a pleasure to read. Even if I don’t agree with them, you write them in a very entertaining way. So in other words thanks for being you. :)

    Jerry wrote on April 30th, 2008
  6. This is a case of a complete lack of fundamental quality control procedures by Baxter. They are more at fault for the contaminated Heparin being distributed than the FDA or the China company. Yes, the China company is guilty of making a faulty product and passing it off as good, but why didn’t Baxter do any incoming inspection of each lot to insure it met their specifications? The FDA cannot check each batch of drugs manufactured in every lab. That responsibility must lie with those selling the products to the public. This is an inexcusable lapse on the part of Baxter.

    They must insure that each batch of pills, Heparin, or whatever conforms 100% to specifications. This is routinely done for almost every part of any product made in the world and especially so for any life-critical products, such as drugs, pacemakers, heart monitors, elevator cables, and thousands of other products. To find a total breakdown of basic QA procedures occurred and not to place the blame squarely on Baxter is beyond belief.

    Dave in Ohio wrote on May 1st, 2008
  7. Thanks, Jerry. =)

    Heather wrote on May 1st, 2008
  8. I thought it was RICH AMERICAN CORPORATISTS who would do anything for greed, not those Chinese minorities who buy all of our debt.

    That’s OK, if the FDA can’t save us from our lack of self reliance, the EPA will!

    Dutch wrote on October 21st, 2010
  9. Dave is right. The “it looks like Heparin” excuse is garbage. GCMS testing, which is the standard in pharma, would not have missed this. Everything has a unique molecular weight. GCMS spits out that number so anyone who went to first grade can tell that two different numbers are different and thus so were the drugs. Something is amiss..

    Dutch wrote on October 21st, 2010
  10. One thing i’m keen on pertaining to your site is that you generally blog post lead to the stage advice.

    Tiffanie Koeing wrote on November 14th, 2011

Leave a Reply

If you'd like to add an avatar to all of your comments click here!

© 2014 Mark's Daily Apple