Page 1 of 18 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 173

Thread: Andrew Kim Absolutely Crushes the Ridiculous Notion of Being "Fat Adapted" page

  1. #1
    ChocoTaco369's Avatar
    ChocoTaco369 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Narberth, PA
    Posts
    5,536

    Andrew Kim Absolutely Crushes the Ridiculous Notion of Being "Fat Adapted"

    Shop Now
    This is an absolutely wonderful article that everyone should read:

    Andrew Kim Blog: Diet Dogma Rears Ugly Head Again: Become a Fat Burner, Eat Your Own Crap, and Live Longer

    My favorite quotation is where he references Mark Sisson's article itself:

    [...]this desire to push back Father Time has spawned and perpetuated some pretty awful ideas which have no basis in any reasonable level of evidence.

    One such idea, actually a few related ideas that I’ll roll into one idea here, is to limit the amount of glucose our cells burn over the course of a lifetime, so as to turn on a primitive stress response mechanism called autophagy, a process whereby cells degrade and recycle their dysfunctional components in the face of nutrient depleted conditions. Unfortunately, this necessarily entails burning proportionately more fatty acids for fuel (or what’s called being “fat adapted” in horribly egregious articles filled with wishful thinking like this one) and turning down thyroid functioning, or the rate at which we live, adaptations that are directly at odds with reaching our full potential as human beings.
    There are so many other good ones.

    Maintaining tissue responsiveness to hormones is, I believe, a key factor in slowing down the aging process. Consider Progeria, a syndrome famous for producing an apparent accelerated aging in children. Progeria is characterized by a massive reduction in the responsiveness of cells to all hormones – a defect thought to drive the degenerative conditions that appear in children with the condition.

    A cell’s responsiveness to hormones is most sensitive when the stress hormones, free amino acids, and free fatty acids in the blood are low. For example, a deficiency of growth hormone, a stress hormone secreted by the pituitary gland, leads to an inflated sensitivity to the hormone insulin in adulthood.
    Another feature of Progeria, which animal models of Progeria and the like have unexpectedly found, is an increase in autophagy – an effect touted as highly desirable among Paleo, low-carbohydrate, and caloric restriction advocates. The molecular mechanisms are not well understood, but it does help to explain, to me at least, why chronic dieters look so haggard and the opposite of healthy, vibrant, and attractive; sometimes, as if death has warmed over. Simply put, autophagy is an adaptive response to metabolic stress that when chronically activated drives premature aging by inducing catabolic processes that outpace the renewal ability of cells. An increased oxidization of fat in preference to glucose is a key feature underlying this downward metabolic shift, as well as an impairment of mitochondrial respiration and a decline in ATP levels.
    Whether we like it or not, autophagy will occur in all of our cells. It is a primitive form of protection that allows cells to dispose of misfolded proteins, misassembled protein complexes, damaged mitochondria, and so forth. There is absolutely no need or reason to force it to occur artificially with special diets – especially so if you’re already healthy. Undue misery is sure to follow from this self-imposed deprivation. Interestingly, all the conditions that bring about autophagy are at odds with the conditions that maximize our potential as organisms, and this entails the thyroid hormone and oxidation of glucose for fuel. I think it’s time for us to toss the idea of diet-induced autophagy into the pile with the other worthless dogmas that have done little more than leave the landscape of diet and nutrition understanding in disarray.
    This is wonderful stuff.

    Mark Sisson's core concept of The Primal Blueprint is a sound one - eat real, fresh, nutritious whole foods, avoid processed, low-nutrient/high anti-nutrient foods. But then he has to go and muddy the waters with groundless bullshit to create a unique product that he can trademark as his own and sell. On one hand he advocates whole foods, but on the other he advocates added fats. He has this ridiculous and groundless "Carbohydrate Curve" that completely undermines the consumption of real food - you can eat all the meat and eggs you want, but you have to count your fruits. It's a cardinal sin to add a 16 calorie packet of white sugar to your coffee, but it's okay to emulsify half a stick of butter in it.

    Huh?

    I've said it before and I'll say it again: there is no such thing as being "fat adapted." We burn fat and glucose for fuel simultaneously at all times. If at any time you are not burning fat and glucose, you are dead. The goal of this diet shouldn't be to avoid fat or carbohydrate or any specific macronutrient. It should be to try and maximize the nutrition we get for each calorie of food we eat. Displacing real food for oils does the same thing as ordering pancakes instead of eggs - you remove nutritious foods for low-nutrient garbage while taking in the same amount of calories. Our goal here should be to eat high quality whole foods that maximize our health. That is how you keep the metabolic rate the highest, and what we want here is to have a high resting metabolic rate. We want the energy of youth - flush skin, high body temperatures, we want to be able to breathe out of our noses alone comfortably without being "mouth breathers," we want a heart rate of around 70, etc. We don't want to be cold and clammy with pale skin and a low heart rate, requiring constant mouth-breathing because our blood oxygen levels are so low from inefficient mitochondria. These are signs of aging and DEATH, not youth and LIFE. This is what carbohydrate restriction and autophagy gets us. Why we would want to emulate rapid aging is beyond me.
    Last edited by ChocoTaco369; 11-06-2013 at 10:32 AM.
    Don't put your trust in anyone on this forum, including me. You are the key to your own success.

  2. #2
    statikcat's Avatar
    statikcat is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Arlington, VA
    Posts
    226
    Doesn't the idea of fat adaption fall apart when you look at people who loose tons of weight on high carb diets? Obviously, they are burning fat while consuming and burning a lot of glucose.

  3. #3
    Gorbag's Avatar
    Gorbag is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    3,169
    Hehe; now grab your swords everybody and get ready for an epic battle...

  4. #4
    RichMahogany's Avatar
    RichMahogany is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    6,414
    Battle of the dead horses. My money's on # 3. He's still got a rib that's not broken to smithereens on the left side somewhere.
    The Champagne of Beards

  5. #5
    statikcat's Avatar
    statikcat is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Arlington, VA
    Posts
    226

  6. #6
    ChocoTaco369's Avatar
    ChocoTaco369 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Narberth, PA
    Posts
    5,536
    Quote Originally Posted by statikcat View Post
    Doesn't the idea of fat adaption fall apart when you look at people who loose tons of weight on high carb diets? Obviously, they are burning fat while consuming and burning a lot of glucose.
    You burn fat and glucose at all times. The only thing that changes is the ratio. Fat burning is dictated by carbohydrate consumption: eat more carbs and the ratio of fat-to-glucose burnt decreases. Eating more fat does not increase fat burning, so the phrase "eat fat to burn fat" is a total lie.

    What matters is how much lower the "CI" part is relative to the "CO." People on high carb/low fat diets that lose weight simply maintained a lower CI than their CO. The best diet is the one that maximizes your "CO" while minimizing your "CI." The macro ratios may vary from person to person, but chances are it'll be an extremely nutrient-dense diet.
    Don't put your trust in anyone on this forum, including me. You are the key to your own success.

  7. #7
    bloodorchid's Avatar
    bloodorchid is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    tn
    Posts
    8,683
    Quote Originally Posted by Gorbag View Post
    Hehe; now grab your swords everybody and get ready for an epic battle...
    Quote Originally Posted by RichMahogany View Post
    Battle of the dead horses. My money's on # 3. He's still got a rib that's not broken to smithereens on the left side somewhere.
    Step right up, step right ladies and gents. You'll see horse abuse the likes ya neva knew existed

    my favorite is where he insults marks ideas on marks own forum. Not just disagree, insult
    beautiful
    yeah you are

    I mean there's so many ants in my eyes! And there are so many TVs, microwaves, radios... I think, I can't, I'm not 100% sure what we have here in stock.. I don't know because I can't see anything! Our prices, I hope, aren't too low!

  8. #8
    sbhikes's Avatar
    sbhikes is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Santa Barbara
    Posts
    8,720
    This is a good article. It is very difficult to understand, however. My basic takeaway is that there are different phenotypes for whether you are prone to obesity or not or for basically anything having to do with metabolism. Your body can change its response to energy inputs after environmentally-induced experiences.

    Basically, sweeping statements that x is wrong and y is right are incorrect because individual bodies are not static, let alone entire populations.

    Biology's response to dieting: the impetus for weight regain | Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
    Female, 5'3", 49, Starting weight: 163lbs. Current weight: 135 (more or less).
    Starting squat: 45lbs. Highest squat: 167.5 x 2. Current Deadlift: 190 x 3

  9. #9
    Hawkward's Avatar
    Hawkward is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Kansas City area
    Posts
    107
    Quote Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369 View Post

    ** dogmatic criticism of diet dogma snipped **

    Mark Sisson's core concept of The Primal Blueprint is a sound one - eat real, fresh, nutritious whole foods, avoid processed, low-nutrient/high anti-nutrient foods. But then he has to go and muddy the waters with groundless bullshit to create a unique product that he can trademark as his own and sell. On one hand he advocates whole foods, but on the other he advocates added fats. He has this ridiculous and groundless "Carbohydrate Curve" that completely undermines the consumption of real food - you can eat all the meat and eggs you want, but you have to count your fruits. It's a cardinal sin to add a 16 calorie packet of white sugar to your coffee, but it's okay to emulsify half a stick of butter in it.

    ** more sanctimonious ranting snipped **
    Please provide a link to support the straw man in bold above. I won't hold my breath. Mark has said that he enjoys sugar in his coffee, by the way. He's not above criticism but there's no reason to do it in that manner.

  10. #10
    Neckhammer's Avatar
    Neckhammer is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    7,148
    Can we just sum up this mega-thread before it starts?

    Kim crushes nothing. Choco agrees with his hypothesis as if its a mathematical law anyhow. Silliness ensues. Another monster thread about nothing clogs the front page with idiocy. Movin on.
    Last edited by Neckhammer; 11-06-2013 at 12:08 PM.

Page 1 of 18 12311 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •