You accuse others of being sold on the Dogma & Marketing, yet all I see is that you're spruiking a diferent marketing model.
Your posts are littered with unsubstantiated & unqualified statments interspersed with the odd fact.
As just one example, you spruik the higher metabolic rate, suggesting higher is better.
What does this mean, heart rate of 200 & Body temp of 40°C ?
How does this vary with individuals?
Conservatism rules in the natural world and the suggestion that we would be designed to expend more energy just to eat more food so our MBR can get as high as possible does not fit, there is an optimum range that is based on efficiency, just because carb consumption pushes those numbers up in no way proves it is healthier, it may just be a functional result of carb consumption, i.e. more internal processing required, so incidental heat generated.
You are basing that entire argument on the assumption of higher MBR is healthier, your statement needs to be qualified to be relevant to anything at all.
There is a raft of such assumptions in your arguments, which tells me you're just sold on a different dogma.
BTW, my diet has always been moderate in all ways and I agree with you when you say eat healthy whole foods with a balanced approach.
"There are no short cuts to enlightenment, the journey is the destination, you have to walk this path alone"