Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: A case for eliminating "macro" and "micro" nutrients

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    5,426
    Shop Now
    If somebody feels more comfortable ignoring their protein intake because they aren't sure about CoenzymeQ10, go for it. Wouldn't work for me, though.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Washington state
    Posts
    6,900
    I get my coenzyme Q10 from beef heart. Is that still good? I fall behind easily...
    Steak, eggs, potatoes - fruits, nuts, berries and forage. Coconut milk and potent herbs and spices. Tea instead of coffee now and teeny amounts of kelp daily. Let's see how this does! Not really had dairy much, and gut seems better for it.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    MD/VA/DC
    Posts
    1,662
    Shop Now
    OK should apologize for that. I just really don't like the use of the term CICO in any context. Yes, we all know that the "CO" part of CICO is really darn complex, and CICO is sorta true, mainly because CO is really complex.

    But to the SAD community, CICO is the philosophy with a very clear and simple meaning. It's also the philosophy that makes people fat and sick and frustrated, like Kelly Korg. I'm just hoping there's some other name out there for all the n=1's so we can avoid using CICO. I like the "fat grams in minus fat grams out for people who are already fat-adapted." But you can't fit that on a bumper sticker. Maybe "Primal with extra carbs" or something like that.
    5'0" female, 45 years old. Started Primal October 31, 2011, at a skinny fat 111.5 lbs. Low weight: 99.5 lb on a fast. Gained back to 115(!) on SAD chocolate, potato chips, and stress. Currently 111.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •