Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 48

Thread: lower volume (2x5) for strength gains (because 5x5 makes me eat too much!) page 4

  1. #31
    not on the rug's Avatar
    not on the rug is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    nj
    Posts
    4,087
    Primal Fuel
    Quote Originally Posted by Greenbeast View Post
    i partially see where you are coming from, with the warmup safety.

    I'm not saying we should follow mark's suggestion's (or anyone else's) like sheep, i think what we are trying to do, some more than others, is to mimic the life grok might have lead.
    I am pointing out that grok would not have likely needed to stress his body to the limit several times a week. He adapted to the life he lead and we, as a species, have his genetics.
    But we know scientifically now, what can prompt an adaptive response in the body. So we can go to failure once or twice a month and prompt the body to develop muscles that will lift that weight. If one wishes they can faff about in the gym several times a week but then i see that as more like a hobby, the same way i can read for hours a week and someone else would say that's a waste of time.
    I think the ideal thing to do is to approach fitness training in order to meet your own specific goals. I would agree that most people want to maximize their time spent in the gym. that's a no brainer. if you are happy with yourself based upon the training that you do, then that's it. end of discussion. but your style of training isn't the ultimate style of training, it isn't the best approach for pure strength, and it isn't the best style of training for pure hypertrophy. its the best for you and your goals. the guy who spends 4 hours a day in the gym who is an aspiring bodybuilder isn't "faffing" off in the gym. he is working to meet his goals. your style of training wouldn't be suited for that. the guy who wants to get as strong as he possibly can to compete in a powerlifting meet would be short changing himself training the way you do it. both of those guys might look at your program and think you weren't serious about lifting and that you were "faffing" off in the gym. if people want a little bit of hypertrophy a little bit of strength, and a lot of metcon, they might join a crossfit gym. that's what would fit their goals.

    working out like a caveman may have is a purely fictional concept. yeah, a caveman didn't workout with barbells. obviously. but I think people underestimate the stress that prehistoric life actually consisted of. it wasn't loafing around, sprint once a week, move a rock here and there. it was hardcore, fight for your life and every morsel of food you eat. going to failure was a part of every waking minute. not having enough to eat was a part of every waking minute. grok physically stressed his body to the limit 24/7.
    I have a lot of hard miles on my body from before I realized I'm not 100% invulnerable. Now I just think I'm 75% invulnerable. -Mr. Anthony

    Give me a spouse/life-partner who I don't want to punch in the throat when she talks. -Canio6

  2. #32
    PrimalHunter's Avatar
    PrimalHunter is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    112
    Quote Originally Posted by not on the rug View Post
    a competitive bodybuilder will more than likely need to train with a high volume of reps and sets, because time and time again, it has been proven to produce maximum hypertrophy.
    Is that just for competitive bodybuilders (i.e., juiceheads), or does high sets/reps produce the most hypertrophy for anyone? The only reason I'm doing a strength routine is because these days everyone says that training for strength is the best way to induce hypertrophy.
    "Don't go in there, General, it's a trap! That's a grain chamber. It makes people like you into people like me."

  3. #33
    not on the rug's Avatar
    not on the rug is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    nj
    Posts
    4,087
    Quote Originally Posted by PrimalHunter View Post
    Is that just for competitive bodybuilders (i.e., juiceheads), or does high sets/reps produce the most hypertrophy for anyone? The only reason I'm doing a strength routine is because these days everyone says that training for strength is the best way to induce hypertrophy.
    Not all bbs are juiceheads. There is a huge natural bb scene, it's just not as highly publicized or glamorized. Plus, there are plenty of people out there that just want to grow muscle and don't care about peak strength.

    Typically, this puts you in an 8-12 rep range for most exercises, and eventually utilizes advanced techniques like pyramids, reverse pyramids, drop sets, supersets, etc...

    Training for strength is the best way to get strong. It is also a good way to induce hypertrophy, but ultimately not the best way.
    Programs like what Joe Defranco's westside for skinny bastards combine the best of both worlds. Stuff like that is pretty time consuming and requires you to eat like a grizzly bear in order to recover
    I have a lot of hard miles on my body from before I realized I'm not 100% invulnerable. Now I just think I'm 75% invulnerable. -Mr. Anthony

    Give me a spouse/life-partner who I don't want to punch in the throat when she talks. -Canio6

  4. #34
    Neckhammer's Avatar
    Neckhammer is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    7,729
    Frankly most use the volume method for hypertrophy.

    There are a few that use HIT.

    I like HIT philosophy and work with that right now. I've done 5 and 6 day a week bodybuilding splits. Just totally not worth it for my goals these days.

    I really don't think it matters until you have eeked out the majority of your genetic potential. Up to then either method will work IMO.... then actually alternating, doing micro and macro cycles, and all that other shit probably is where you have to go.
    Last edited by Neckhammer; 07-03-2013 at 06:58 PM.

  5. #35
    RichMahogany's Avatar
    RichMahogany is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    7,208
    Quote Originally Posted by Neckhammer View Post
    Frankly most use the volume method for hypertrophy.

    There are a few that use HIT.

    I like HIT philosophy and work with that right now. I've done 5 and 6 day a week bodybuilding splits. Just totally not worth it for my goals these days.

    I really don't think it matters until you have eeked out the majority of your genetic potential. Up to then either method will work IMO.... then actually alternating, doing micro and macro cycles, and all that other shit probably is where you have to go.
    I think this is true, but I also think you have to get strong first in order to get results. The 8-15 rep hypertrophy range is worthless if you can't rep a weight 8-15 times that's heavy enough to induce a hypertrophy adaptation. For someone who's not quite strong to begin with, bodybuilding type workouts are more a waste of time than anything. Once you're squatting 2x bodyweight, then choose if you want to mainly pursue further strength gains or mainly hypertrophy.

    HIT is great if you want to get the absolute most "bang for your buck." The return may diminish for any additional work thereafter, but it's still significant up to a couple workouts of 3 x 5 a week for most people who aren't already damn strong. This is where individual goals have to dictate appropriate programming choices.

  6. #36
    Lockstock's Avatar
    Lockstock is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    272
    I also find commanding my biceps to grow induces some metaphysical muscular response that generates extra muscular hypertrophy. Bro.

  7. #37
    RichMahogany's Avatar
    RichMahogany is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    7,208
    Quote Originally Posted by Lockstock View Post
    I also find commanding my biceps to grow induces some metaphysical muscular response that generates extra muscular hypertrophy. Bro.
    Works better if you curse at them. A lot.

  8. #38
    Lockstock's Avatar
    Lockstock is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    272
    Quote Originally Posted by RichMahogany View Post
    Works better if you curse at them. A lot.

    To much and will hurt it's feelings and it shall shrink

    It's happened more then once in awkward places. Wait, what?

  9. #39
    archaeologyboy's Avatar
    archaeologyboy is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    japan
    Posts
    17
    reading this has given me plenty of food for thought, and a chance to reflect on my goals.

    I think having gained quite a bit of mass (before i started LHT I was 71kg, now 78kg, bodyfat is about the same) and given that I am sick of eating like a grizzly and/or not sleeping well (it seems the bad sleep might also be a sign I'm a little overtrained, as is the need for huge amounts of food for recovery) the time is probably right for a reassessment of my training schedule.

    Dropping volume feels right, as I think I more want reconstitution than mass gain at this point - I might even experiment with just one work set. And maybe drop to LHT 2x a week to add HIIT or sprints, something I was thinking I'll do eventually anyway.

    And I should perhaps reflect that I've been working too hard towards my goal of 2xbw deadlift, I should remember that I'll get there eventually with consistent training, and that it's health and vitality I am training for, not performance - for a while the two go together, but when they diverge I'd rather choose health.

    finally,Greenbeast - can you give any links to the program you are on (or even a name for it?). It sounds unconventional and I can follow your grok-logic so I'd like to learn a little more (tho for now I'm a bit skeptical, and I definitely won't be dropping my warm-up sets any time soon). Thanks!
    Me: 39, 5'11", primal since Dec 2011, always been active (surfing, martial arts) but no athlete.
    Currently: bw 78kg (17ish% fat?), Squat 102.5kgx5 , Bench 67.5kgx5, Deadlift 115kgx5 (July 2013)

    If less is more is more even more?

  10. #40
    Greenbeast's Avatar
    Greenbeast is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Kent, UK
    Posts
    539
    I will talk to my trainer, i don't know if there's a name for it specifically but i've been wanting to read up on his sources for a while anyway. Up till now the only thing that mattered was that it works and takes no time at all, i'm increasing my lifts at a pretty reasonable rate and hopefully will be at maintenance within a few months (another handful of sessions) then i can get back to really thinking about body fat drops again (it's going down still just slower than before)

    My half tongue-in-cheek response to not on the rug about warm-ups is that my first n reps are the warm up for the final rep

    which is not all that crazy when you consider that the first few reps are 'easy' and then the later few are 'hard', so is that much different from lifting lighter weights first?

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •