Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: interesting blog article about the first law of thermodynamics page

  1. #1
    maranne's Avatar
    maranne is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Linz, Austria
    Posts
    171

    interesting blog article about the first law of thermodynamics

    Primal Fuel

  2. #2
    jo's Avatar
    jo
    jo is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    733
    Yep - fab blog post. I think Taubes made a similar point in GCBC. The energy equation is so simple an idiot could understand it, and there are a lot of idiots in the nutritionista business.

  3. #3
    RSL's Avatar
    RSL
    RSL is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Chicagoland
    Posts
    583
    That's a great article. Thanks for posting it!

  4. #4
    periquin's Avatar
    periquin is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Uruguay
    Posts
    1,368
    Good web site.

    Brought something to mind though. The second law of thermodynamics talks about entropy. Entropy basically is a "systems' natural tendency to move toward disorder, not order. I wonder how the physics types and the biology types work it out. Entropy doesn't seem to allow for evolution.

  5. #5
    Stabby's Avatar
    Stabby is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Stabsville
    Posts
    2,463
    Ah yeah the entropy one is a good point too. I've heard the argument that that per calorie, our bodies need to spend more energy to process protein than carbs so 50 calories of carbs and 50 calories of protein will have a different impact on weight. Not anywhere close to significant but that theory gets attributed to the efficacy of high protein, low carb diets.

    The first law of theormodynamics would make sense if energy output was static. Its proponents are kind of of banking on that me, a 140 pound active male, will spend about 2500 calories per day and if I ate 3000, I would store the difference. But if I eat 3000 I spend 3000 no matter my exercise. So that's clearly bunk. If an insulin/leptin resistant person is "supposed to" eat 3000 to maintain weight, they can likely eat 2500 and still gain weight. Insulin resistance causes more initial storage of carbs and leptin resistance inhibits lipolysis. Duh.

    It's sad that there are still people doing weight watchers and crap. We need a universal megaphone or something.
    Stabbing conventional wisdom in its face.

    Anyone who wants to talk nutrition should PM me!

  6. #6
    TheGrappler's Avatar
    TheGrappler is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Inwood, New York
    Posts
    727
    yeah, nothing in nature can be that clear cut. there are ALWAYS variables XD
    "I know what my body needs and what it can handle. There's no better way to achieve my goal than what im doing now. If my regimen leads to my death, be it in six days or six months...I will die fullfiled. The outcome is irrelavent so long as i steer towards my fate. If death is to be my prize, i welcome it with open arms."

    "A pound of meat a day keeps the doctor away"

  7. #7
    Chefgerry's Avatar
    Chefgerry is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    In the frozen North
    Posts
    340
    I wonder if any one has bothered to tell mother nature of all these unbelievable findings of science that effects our energy balance? No wonder I'm gaining weight eating nothing. j/k

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •