Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Looks like Bran is good for Type II Diabetes page

  1. #1
    barryman9000's Avatar
    barryman9000 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Posts
    355

    Looks like Bran is good for Type II Diabetes

    Shop Now
    "A number of studies have linked higher consumption of whole grains to lower risks of developing type 2 diabetes and heart disease."

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100518/hl_nm/us_more_women

  2. #2
    LessofMimi's Avatar
    LessofMimi is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    721
    Yeah, this Type 2 will disagree. Less grains the better. None is great.
    Melissa Fritcher - 330/252/150
    http://lessofmimi.wordpress.com
    Trample the weak, hurdle the dead.

  3. #3
    Grol's Avatar
    Grol is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    919
    This is the closest I could find to the research

    I'd like to see the rest of the study if someone finds it. I've seen these types of conclusions over and over again though. I wonder how many of those 852 dead diabetic nurses were grain free? Or exactly how they adjusted for dietary and other lifestyle risk? They did establish that a lot of nurses eating grains have diabetes, that's for sure. And it appears whole grains are better than refined grains. There's a shock.

    Why is the American Heart Association in bed with Big Grain?

    I'm still new to looking at this stuff, so correct me if I'm overreacting.

  4. #4
    Stabby's Avatar
    Stabby is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Stabsville
    Posts
    2,463
    If you replace refined grains with whole grans and add assloads of fiber in, carbs are less destructive to type two diabetics, obviously there would be some improvement. I would like to see meat, fats, and vegetables pit against whole grains

    actually I have. It works!
    Stabbing conventional wisdom in its face.

    Anyone who wants to talk nutrition should PM me!

  5. #5
    Helen in Oz's Avatar
    Helen in Oz is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    573
    Epidemiology seems like such an inexact science it hardly deserves the label 'science' imho. Just too many uncontrolled variables.

    In studies like this, I always wonder what the 'healthier' choices are displacing. If you're eating more grains - maybe a salad roll or banana bread or something - you're eating less oil-and-sugar-laden snack foods. People who are trying to make the right choices and eating wholegrains might also tend to choose more whole foods over processed.

  6. #6
    Stabby's Avatar
    Stabby is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Stabsville
    Posts
    2,463
    Ah and that too. Whole grains vs refined grains is a correlative marker for general nutrition sufficiency and avoidance of the most terrible junk vs. pizza, nachos and soda.
    Stabbing conventional wisdom in its face.

    Anyone who wants to talk nutrition should PM me!

  7. #7
    Helen in Oz's Avatar
    Helen in Oz is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    573
    PrimalCon New York
    correlative marker. You know all the big words, Stabby. /doffs hat.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •