Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Carbs vs Calories vs Fat for weight/fat loss page

  1. #1
    Mikee5's Avatar
    Mikee5 is offline Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    51

    Carbs vs Calories vs Fat for weight/fat loss

    Primal Fuel
    I don't do well physically and mentally on VLC but it's the only time I've seen real results in terms of weight loss, even consuming 2000+ cals a day with 160g+ fat. I haven't experimented with my fat intake and have kept it consistent despite slightly increasing carbs (still low carb) and experiencing, of course, temporary water retention and even some fat gain.

    I was low cal on high carb but still 15lbs heavier.

    What is generally the best balance for optimal weight loss? Are carb refeeds/cycling efficient? What are your individual experiences?

  2. #2
    dkJames's Avatar
    dkJames is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    314
    My experience:
    - First, go VLC (grain free / sugar and starch free / legume free as a minimum, fruits out as well when really VLC) and no veg oil for a few months. It should take care of the bulk body fat (aka visceral fat).
    - Then, if everything went well, you should be much closer to ideal weight and not hungry most of the time. That's when you switch to one meal a day. The idea is to stay on low insulin levels and rely on your fat store for 20 hours every day. During your single meal, preferably in early evening, eat whatever you want that covers your energy needs but stick to primal nutritious food.

    Results are really good on that WOE. Work out fasted several times a week and once in a while like every 2 weeks, skip a meal (44 hours fast).

  3. #3
    loafingcactus's Avatar
    loafingcactus is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    522
    So there is really no population evidence for a particular carb level being more effective for weight loss. As a VLC person, I think there is usefulness in that you are not hungry, but the fact is that my weight loss is exactly what the BodyBugg computer model predicts for my total calories. For my wellness (energy and mental acuity) I find re-feeds are necessary. But again, none of this is any kind of magic that bursts me out of what a computer model would have me losing based on gross calories.
    “In God we trust; all others must bring data.” W. Edwards Deming
    Blogging at http://loafingcactus.com

  4. #4
    magicmerl's Avatar
    magicmerl is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    2,017
    Quote Originally Posted by loafingcactus View Post
    So there is really no population evidence for a particular carb level being more effective for weight loss. As a VLC person, I think there is usefulness in that you are not hungry, but the fact is that my weight loss is exactly what the BodyBugg computer model predicts for my total calories. For my wellness (energy and mental acuity) I find re-feeds are necessary. But again, none of this is any kind of magic that bursts me out of what a computer model would have me losing based on gross calories.
    In fact, pretty much ALL of the population evidence is of people eating lots of starches and doing well.

    Rice is your friend.
    Griff's cholesterol primer
    bloodorchid: paleo and primal are not low carb
    Winterbike: What I eat every day is what other people eat to treat themselves.

  5. #5
    Mikee5's Avatar
    Mikee5 is offline Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    51
    Quote Originally Posted by loafingcactus View Post
    So there is really no population evidence for a particular carb level being more effective for weight loss. As a VLC person, I think there is usefulness in that you are not hungry, but the fact is that my weight loss is exactly what the BodyBugg computer model predicts for my total calories. For my wellness (energy and mental acuity) I find re-feeds are necessary. But again, none of this is any kind of magic that bursts me out of what a computer model would have me losing based on gross calories.
    Can you share an example of your refeed days? Thanks!

  6. #6
    loafingcactus's Avatar
    loafingcactus is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    522
    I don't think my refeed is anything to emulate, but here is an example that fixed my head- regular day of eating, plus:
    -an Odwalla c-monster
    -a plate of sushi
    -a brownie with frosting
    For me, it is adding high sugar and simple carbs.
    “In God we trust; all others must bring data.” W. Edwards Deming
    Blogging at http://loafingcactus.com

  7. #7
    Neckhammer's Avatar
    Neckhammer is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    3,911
    Get Support
    Quote Originally Posted by dkJames View Post
    My experience:
    - First, go VLC (grain free / sugar and starch free / legume free as a minimum, fruits out as well when really VLC) and no veg oil for a few months. It should take care of the bulk body fat (aka visceral fat).
    - Then, if everything went well, you should be much closer to ideal weight and not hungry most of the time. That's when you switch to one meal a day. The idea is to stay on low insulin levels and rely on your fat store for 20 hours every day. During your single meal, preferably in early evening, eat whatever you want that covers your energy needs but stick to primal nutritious food.

    Results are really good on that WOE. Work out fasted several times a week and once in a while like every 2 weeks, skip a meal (44 hours fast).
    This is good stuff. A low insulin diet has shown to be excellent for health, but you can achieve that with IF or LCHF.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •