Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 30 of 30

Thread: High LDL cholesterol page 3

  1. #21
    Lumifer's Avatar
    Lumifer is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    116
    Shop Now
    Quote Originally Posted by primalmedic413 View Post
    Yikes, Lumifer you ought to get tested for familial hypercholesterolemia. Thats an awfully high LDL-P!
    Yep, I will, next in line are tests for FH and for APoE status. On the other hand, none of of my immediate ancestors had unusually early heart disease.

    I guess we'll see.

  2. #22
    Cryptocode's Avatar
    Cryptocode is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Norco, California
    Posts
    1,341
    Read Griff's Primer on Cholesterol and post the ratios,
    "When the search for truth is confused with political advocacy, the pursuit of knowledge is reduced to the quest for power." - Alston Chase

  3. #23
    Lumifer's Avatar
    Lumifer is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    116
    Quote Originally Posted by Cryptocode View Post
    Read Griff's Primer on Cholesterol and post the ratios,
    I've read the Griff primer. It is a primer. Things like Peter Attia's cholesterol series look more useful to me. Add Hyperlipid, LLVLC, Masterjohn, etc. to taste :-)

    All my ratios are fine. However I'm not willing to accept them as the best possible estimator of my CVD risk.

  4. #24
    Forgotmylastusername's Avatar
    Forgotmylastusername is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    948
    Quote Originally Posted by Kegas76 View Post
    With triglycerides under 100 the tendency is for LDL particle to the larger fluffy type. HDL above the standard 50 level also reinforces this trend for LDL type. (http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/cont...1/F1.large.jpg)
    Once you account for LDL-P, the relationship of atherosclerosis to particle size is abolished. Big and fluffy or small and dense doesn't matter if particle count is high.

  5. #25
    KimchiNinja's Avatar
    KimchiNinja is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Seoul
    Posts
    1,350
    Quote Originally Posted by AJR View Post
    What's scary is that traditional medicine thinks this number is high. With the recent moves to set insurance premiums based on the individual's numbers I get worried.
    That's really sick and twisted. Financially force people to eat what the government says they should eat.

    Sounds like something Amerika would do; "Buy the white bread, take the drugs, or else".

  6. #26
    EatMoveSleep's Avatar
    EatMoveSleep is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    492
    Quote Originally Posted by AJR View Post
    No - no change in type or quantity of salt...

    Bloodwork results:
    Total cholesterol 266
    HDL 73
    Trigs 52
    LDL 183
    Chol/HDLC ratio 3.6
    Very good ratios there, I think you're doing everything right.

  7. #27
    AJR's Avatar
    AJR
    AJR is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    14
    I found a couple of good articles on the LDL size (large vs. small) and left them with my doc. He asked me to come back in for another round of bloodwork today to see where I'm at so more info to come...

  8. #28
    Bet's Avatar
    Bet
    Bet is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Georgia, USA
    Posts
    9
    I recently had bloodwork done and had similar numbers. Of course I got the 'your cholesterol is high, you need to eat less fat and exercise more'. Well I probably could exercise more, but when I did the ratios, I was fine. The only 'high' number was total cholesterol, 216. Total cholesterol is a meaningless number, unless you are over 350. I do have hashis and IBS and have been gluten/grain free for 8 months and trying to be as primal as I can. I feel the best I have in a long time, so I'm just ignoring the doctors orders.

  9. #29
    AJR's Avatar
    AJR
    AJR is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by primalmedic413 View Post
    Your ratios are solid. To be completely sure, get an LDL particle count.
    Had a VAP done:

    Total LDL-C direct = 218
    Total HDL-C direct = 72
    Total VLDL-C direct = 18
    Total cholesterol = 308
    Trigs direct = 64

    Total non HDL-C = 236
    Total APOB100 = 146

    LP(a) = 8.0
    IDL-C = 31
    REAL LDL-C = 178
    SUM TOTAL LDL-C = 218
    real LDL size pattern = A

    Remnant LIPO = 42

    HDL-2 = 23
    HDL-3 = 49
    VLDL-3 = 11


    The three ratios are still good - any other thoughts? Thanks!

  10. #30
    KimchiNinja's Avatar
    KimchiNinja is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Seoul
    Posts
    1,350
    ^ So what is this saying, that you have large safe "pattern A" LDL and a good (low) number for bad VLDL?

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •