Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Nutjob anti-primal review on amazon... page 2

  1. #11
    eKatherine's Avatar
    eKatherine is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    5,426
    Primal Blueprint Expert Certification
    Quote Originally Posted by aliphian View Post
    "Hair samples analysed shows that 200 Roman gladiators found in a burial site were all vegan!"

    The meat eaters must have slaughtered all 200 of them.
    I have seen this sort of argument used by vegans many times. It goes that X population does not eat meat (even though it may be because none is available or they can't afford it it, but would buy it if they could), therefore they are vegan. No. They are poor people who can't afford or otherwise have no access to meat.

  2. #12
    smartuko's Avatar
    smartuko is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    110
    Thanks for the post. A good laugh was needed right now. LMAO!

  3. #13
    Timbobaggins's Avatar
    Timbobaggins is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    14
    I think it's more likely they ate a nutritionally deficient diet of barley because their gladiatorial overlords would rather of eaten the meat themselves rather than "waste" it unnecessarily on their gladiators/slaves. The harsh truth of it.

  4. #14
    lordgrover's Avatar
    lordgrover is offline Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    South Gloucestershire, UK
    Posts
    64
    My copy of Primal Connection received today.
    Thus far, I can see no correlation between our mate Phil's opinion and the book. I can only conclude he's talking out of his arse.

    I'm peckish. Pass me more cow.

  5. #15
    eKatherine's Avatar
    eKatherine is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    5,426
    Quote Originally Posted by lordgrover View Post
    My copy of Primal Connection received today.
    Thus far, I can see no correlation between our mate Phil's opinion and the book. I can only conclude he's talking out of his arse.

    I'm peckish. Pass me more cow.


    You're welcome.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •