I have seen this sort of argument used by vegans many times. It goes that X population does not eat meat (even though it may be because none is available or they can't afford it it, but would buy it if they could), therefore they are vegan. No. They are poor people who can't afford or otherwise have no access to meat.
Originally Posted by aliphian
Thanks for the post. A good laugh was needed right now. LMAO!
I think it's more likely they ate a nutritionally deficient diet of barley because their gladiatorial overlords would rather of eaten the meat themselves rather than "waste" it unnecessarily on their gladiators/slaves. The harsh truth of it.
My copy of Primal Connection received today.
Thus far, I can see no correlation between our mate Phil's opinion and the book. I can only conclude he's talking out of his arse.
I'm peckish. Pass me more cow.
Originally Posted by lordgrover