Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Help! Looking for a good bodyweight only routine to transform my body page 2

  1. #11
    breetbree's Avatar
    breetbree is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    united states
    Posts
    115
    i saw you guys mentioned insanity, and i honestly love it. i'm overweight but i've definitely seen a change in my physique since i've started using it. to add in strength with it, i do a max set of push ups, pull ups or whatever, set my watch timer for 90 seconds and do the insanity workout for 90 seconds, pause it and do another max set of whatever exercise and repeat. i know it's not even close to the best for overall strength, but i think it has really helped in changing my body so far :-)

  2. #12
    Drmike's Avatar
    Drmike is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    95
    Check out fitness 666

  3. #13
    Goldust's Avatar
    Goldust is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    23
    Quote Originally Posted by linuxguy0481 View Post
    So if anyone can help. I would appreciate it. Just looking for a HARD workout routine.
    Here would be my suggestions:

    You Are Your Own Gym by Mark Lauren (books/DVD's/iphone app)

    Raising the Bar and Pushing the Limits by Al Kavadlo

    Fitness 666

    Overcoming Gravity by Steven Low

    Reddit's Bodyweight Fitness Community


    https://www.store.ddpyoga.com


    I've bought the DDP Yoga dvd's a few weeks back and have been surprised at how much harder they are than what I was expecting. I've never been interested in trying Yoga before but I can't say enough good things about them. About the only thing that I've been supplementing them with is dips and pull ups at the end of the workouts.

  4. #14
    Jiggyz's Avatar
    Jiggyz is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Austin
    Posts
    23
    Not to be a smart a, but why not just do the PB fitness? If done properly, with proper form, those exercises will do the trick for a long time, and they can be very difficult. I have been working them for about 10 months now, am down 30lbs from 202LBS. No gym, just my backyard and my kid's jungle gym a couple of times/week. I carve out about 30 mins for myself and it is done. The secret to all this is to not get injured, go slow, use proper form, and be consistent, and some good mobility drills. Mark and his team have spent a lot of time trying to make this as simple and easy as possible and we tend to spiral up and make it complicated.

    Really the hard part part is finding time to get in 3-5 hrs of slow moving and a good play session or 2, as I am sure you are finding out, with a little one.

  5. #15
    skline2's Avatar
    skline2 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    137
    My family really likes Convict Conditioning. We started the first of the year. I've noticed a big change in the way my upper body looks. My strength is rapidly improving.

    We started at level 1 of the four beginner exercises (push ups, leg raises, pull ups, and squats). The progressions have been easy to follow - not always easy to do though. We do one exercise each morning from Monday through Thursday. To do a warm up and the sets takes about 15 minutes - perfect for someone with little kids.

    I also sprint once a week and try to walk as much as possible. Oh...and doing my own yard work certainly is helping too. Pulling out bushes/trees, mulching, mowing the grass, etc. are all good primal workouts.

  6. #16
    Muzza's Avatar
    Muzza is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Vienna Austria
    Posts
    1
    PrimalCon New York
    Best advise I could give is look into a high quality rebounder. I say that because the cheap asian made brands are cheap asian made brands and they give your body a comparable workout. The higher quality rebounders such as the cellulizer or the Bellicon offer a rebounding workout which your entire body is worked as intended due to the deeper bottom end of the swing and rebound action. I personally prefer the Bellicon because unlike metal springs holding the mat, Bellicon uses bungie cords. I can bounce anytime day or night and disturb nobody else in the house. Its fun too.

    Rebounding is so underated or not known. I lived in Australia for 18 years. Every man and his dog seems to have one but they all sit collecting dust in the garage. I now live in Austria. Nobody has one and nobodys heard of it.

    I read a book by Albert Earle Carter almost 30 years ago and have been doing it myself. He was a wrestler (olympian) rebounding and technique training were his main workouts. He suggested he never met a man stronger than he was. I cant remember so well but I do recall the rebounder works the body mainly from its constant opposing forces against gravity and the rebounding exersises strengthens the deeper core muscles attaching to bone.

    He also got his kids into it also. He noticed the balance, strength gains in them quite significantly. I have 3 little kids myself. They are bouncing and fighting over them most of the day they love them. Incidently, i bought only 2 on purpose to sharpen their teeth so to speak.

    I am also complimenting this by cementing to metal poles into my front yard which i will crank a slackline between. Between those to fun play type excersises along will strengthen you and add incredible balance to your body.

    You could also consider tabata protocol exersises which intensly work you in minutes. I especially like tabata squats. Weeeeedoggy do they burn.

    Also try reading the following by NASA about rebounding.

    Albert E. Carter Said It; NASA Confirmed It!

    “Rebound exercise is the most efficient, effective form of exercise yet devised by man.”
    The Miracles of Rebound Exercise; Carter, Albert E.; The National institute of Reboundology and Health, Inc. Edmonds, Washington, 1979.

    NASA says, "...for similar levels of heart rate and oxygen consumption, the magnitude of the biomechanical stimuli is greater with jumping on a trampoline than with running, a finding that might help identify acceleration parameters needed for the design of remedial procedures to avert deconditioning in persons exposed to weightlessness. “

    The above statement is one of several made in a scientific study published in the Journal of Applied Physiology 49(5): 881-887, 1980, which confirms many of the statements previously made in The Miracles of Rebound Exercise, 1979. The research was performed by the Biomechanical Research Division, NASA-Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, in cooperation with the Wenner-Gren Research laboratory, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.

    The four scientists, A, Bhattacharya, E. p, McCutcheon, E. Shvariz, and J, E. Greenleaf, secured the assistance of eight young men between the ages of 19 and 26 to each walk, jog, and run on a treadmill which was operated at four different speeds and then jump on a standard sized trampoline at four different heights to compare the difference between the two modes of exercise.

    Although treadmill running had been studied many times before, the scientists found that "...measurements of the necessary variables have not been reported previously for trampoline exercise." The trampoline testing was conducted at least one week after the treadmill testing.

    The six measurements that were taken on all eight of the subjects were:

    1. A pulse before exercising.

    2. A pulse immediately after exercising.

    3. The amount of oxygen consumed while exercising,

    4. The amount of G-force experienced at the ankle while exercising

    5. The amount of G-force experienced at the lower-back while exercising,

    6 The amount of G-force experienced at the forehead while exercising.

    The pulse was obtained by a battery-powered electrocardiographic unit taped to the subject's body which transmitted its signals to a custom designed receiver which in turn recorded the information by electronically writing it on a chart.

    The oxygen consumption was measured with a K-meter that the subject carried on his back.

    The G-force experienced by the ankle, back and forehead of each of the university students was measured by small sensitive accelerometers which were placed in Plexiglas holders that were taped to the ankle, the small of the back, and the forehead.

    After a thorough medical examination, the healthy students were issued a pair of shorts and new Nike running shoes to standardize the conditions to be measured. They were given familiarization sessions on laboratory procedures, treadmill running, and trampoline jumping to ensure the exercise techniques would be the same. Each student then walked or ran four different speeds on the treadmill with a five to ten minute rest period between runs while the scientist recorded their statistics and compared them with previous treadmill studies for accuracy.

    A week later, these same athletes returned to bounce on a trampoline at four different heights with a five to ten minute rest period in between exercise sessions. Again the scientists recorded their statistics, only this time, they had no previous studies to compare them to since trampolining had not been previously studied. The only studies available were the preliminary studies which began in August of 1977 on passive restrained humans and animals exposed to increasing frequency and amplitude of vibration forces designed to increase heart rate and metabolic activity, "These responses measured by whole-body vibration resemble those during mild exercise and suggest that perhaps body vibration could be used in place of exercise for those who are ambulatory.

    The results of trampoline vs. treadmill study were startling to the scientists but quite frankly, were expected by us at the National Institute of Reboundology and Health, now named the American Institute of Reboundology, Inc. Following are some of the results revealed by this team of scientists from NASA:

    1. The G-force measured at the ankle was always more than twice the G-force measured at the back and fore- head while running on a treadmill.

    This helps to explain shin splints and knee problems, especially when the natural shock absorbing system of the body becomes so fatigued that it doesn't do its job correctly, thus throwing added unexpected forces on already tired muscles, ligaments, and tendons, forcing them beyond the point of rupture.

    2. While jumping on a trampoline, the G-.force was almost the same at all three points, (ankle, back, forehead) and well below the rupture threshold of a normal healthy Individual.

    This makes it possible to exercise the entire body knowing that there is no undue pressure applied to any part of the body such as the feet, ankles, and legs, and at the same time knowing that each part of the body is receiving the necessary environmental stresses it needs to become stronger cell by cell.

    3. "The external work output at equivalent levels of oxygen uptake was significantly greater while trampolining than running. The greatest difference was about 68% ."

    The efficient use of the vertical forces of acceleration and deceleration to produce internal loading by directly opposing the gravitational pull develops more biomechanical work with less energy expended, thus less oxygen used and less demand placed on the heart.

    4. While trampolining, as long as the G-force remained below 4-Gs, the ratio of oxygen consumption compared to biomechani- cal conditioning was sometimes more than twice as efficient as treadmill running.

    It is Important to note that although this experiment was performed on a trampoline where the participants were able to develop a G-force as high as 8-G's, the efficient use of energy was below 4-G's. People involved in rebound exercise on rebound units have been measured only as high as 3.5-G's, (United States Air Force, Dr. Ward Dean) so that any activity on a rebound unit is more efficient than treadmill running at any speed.

    5. With the G-force the same as or greater than 4-G's II ...there was no significant difference in the oxygen uptake between the two regimens."

    Even when a person is able to develop a force on the trampoline of more than 4- G's, although it is no more efficient as far as oxygen consumption than running, it is still much better on the lower extremities because all of the cells of the body are still below their rupture threshold providing a safe way to exercise.

    6. " ...averting the deconditioning that occurs during the immobilization of bed rest or space flight, due to a lack of gravireceptor stimulation (in addition to other factors), requires an acceleration profile that can be delivered at a relatively low metabolic cost. .for equivalent metabolic cost, and acceleration.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •