If you say so, but I'm not convinced, because you didn't write a 10,000 character post about it. I would have eventually gotten around to asking all the right questions, because when I'm not 100% sure of something, I research it thoroughly before "speaking with conviction"; but I don't have the energy to sift through 8 really long paragraphs filled with more of the same thing. Hell, I even read your name as pkloop for a while there. I need more sleep.
Originally Posted by pklopp
Your writing style, since most of what you do is cut and paste from scientific articles, isn't clear and concise at all. You quote the same thing of mine, remove parts, post more of the same thing, then formulate an argument against nothing. I can't even count how many times you created a straw man in your posts. It got old. The fault isn't entirely on you though, I saw errors in my posts from not spending the time you did to make sure it was accurate.
Unfortunately, this place isn't exactly ideal for having debates, as you said in one of your other novels about posts addressed to certain people or something, as Paleobird repeatedly shows by contributing nothing to threads except throwing shit at people she doesn't agree with from the side. It also escalates to ugly really fast, for no reason, since it seems like people like you can't argue without trying to insult someone else as if this lends credit to their position. You're fortunate you're in the right place, otherwise I'm sure this would have ended differently.
I guess you missed the part where he threw the first stones. I don't blame you, I don't read his posts either.
I just love it when someone gets a little bit of Latin under their belt and then accuses someone else of "ad hominem fallacies" while calling them "gay" and "creepy" in reference to children.
Last edited by Derpamix; 06-14-2013 at 03:40 AM.
He who dares not offend cannot be honest.