Page 10 of 21 FirstFirst ... 8910111220 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 210

Thread: Rippetoe's New Article - Must Read If You Have Strength Questions page 10

  1. #91
    RichMahogany's Avatar
    RichMahogany is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    6,414
    Shop Now
    I think the relevant question would be whether it would be an easier task for the powerlifter (assuming you mean a powerlifter, not a weightlifter, who also benefit by being stronger) to learn the one-armed chin-up or for the gymnast to learn to deadlift a competitive amount of weight.

    What do you think?

  2. #92
    quikky's Avatar
    quikky is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,832
    Quote Originally Posted by Gorbag View Post
    I can tell you for sure that also a 150 pound powerlifter sucks in doing one armed chins from a dead position, if he have not trained especially for doing just that. It only confirms that "strength" is spesific and that we compares apples and oranges by comparing the "strength" of a gymnast and the "strength" of a weigthlifter...
    Don't confuse skill and technique with strength. Gymnastics takes a lot of practice. A one arm chin involves a lot of technique and practice to learn how to properly balance yourself and control the movement. Strength won't teach you technique in other sports. That's why Rippetoe says to build a strength base with barbells, and then practice for your sport.

    The whole point is that strength is general. Becoming strong won't make you a top football player, but it will make you a Bette one. Becoming stronger won't teach you MMA, but it amplify your training. Strength is your ability to produce force, and it applies to every physical pursuit. Barbells are the best way to attain it, and allow you to fully exhaust your generic potential.

  3. #93
    Gorbag's Avatar
    Gorbag is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    3,162
    Quote Originally Posted by quikky View Post
    Don't confuse skill and technique with strength. Gymnastics takes a lot of practice.
    And don't confuse or underestimate the element of skill and technique in barbell compound movements! It's a lot of neurological pathways in play by a skilled lifter, so thinking that this is a "pure strength" movement is wrong since such a movement doesn’t exist. Athletes from various sports that have regular testing in barbell movements soon learn all the subtle tricks in the book to get the weight up to passing their tests without necessary creating much more physiological strength adaption to what they are doing.

    Quote Originally Posted by quikky View Post
    The whole point is that strength is general.
    Certainly not, one of the first things you will learn when attending sport-school is that "strength" is always specific, except the physiological adaption that happens in the muscle cell. Even movements that are very similar may give a very different outcome whether you have trained for it or not...

  4. #94
    iniQuity's Avatar
    iniQuity is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Northern NJ
    Posts
    5,672
    Quote Originally Posted by quikky View Post
    Don't confuse skill and technique with strength. Gymnastics takes a lot of practice. A one arm chin involves a lot of technique and practice to learn how to properly balance yourself and control the movement.
    You don't need to balance when you're hanging, you probably meant to control swing. Either way, I hope you didn't mean to say that a one arm chin up isn't a strength move.
    I used to seriously post here, now I prefer to troll.

  5. #95
    RichMahogany's Avatar
    RichMahogany is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    6,414
    Quote Originally Posted by Gorbag View Post
    And don't confuse or underestimate the element of skill and technique in barbell compound movements! It's a lot of neurological pathways in play by a skilled lifter, so thinking that this is a "pure strength" movement is wrong since such a movement doesn’t exist. Athletes from various sports that have regular testing in barbell movements soon learn all the subtle tricks in the book to get the weight up to passing their tests without necessary creating much more physiological strength adaption to what they are doing.
    Then their tests have standards that are too low. Of course a totally detrained lifter will progress rapidly as he learns the movements of the compound lifts. How does that refute the necessity or usefulness of strength?

    Quote Originally Posted by Gorbag View Post
    Certainly not, one of the first things you will learn when attending sport-school is that "strength" is always specific, except the physiological adaption that happens in the muscle cell. Even movements that are very similar may give a very different outcome whether you have trained for it or not...
    I'm not sure what you mean by sport-school. We don't have such a thing here in the U.S. to my knowledge. But they're wrong if they say that "strength" is always specific.

    Nobody's arguing whether training the movements of a particular sport is an important part of being good at that sport. But between 2 weightlifters, 2 Jiu Jitsu fighters, 2 Wrestlers, or 2 Football quarterbacks (even 2 golfers) of equal levels of skill in their individual sport, the stronger will prevail.

    Show me someone who squats 500 lbs to depth and I'll show you someone who can leg press an impressive amount of weight, even if he's never trained the leg press. Strength is undeniably general.

  6. #96
    iniQuity's Avatar
    iniQuity is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Northern NJ
    Posts
    5,672
    What are we arguing again?
    I used to seriously post here, now I prefer to troll.

  7. #97
    RichMahogany's Avatar
    RichMahogany is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    6,414
    Quote Originally Posted by iniQuity View Post
    What are we arguing again?
    I forget. Probably calories in/calories out. Or how much butter is appropriate to put in a cup of coffee. Or whether I should paint iodine on my junk before or after sitting in an ice bath.

  8. #98
    Gorbag's Avatar
    Gorbag is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    3,162
    A very pointless discussion until the "general strength " guys defines "strength" and put up the corresponding testing movements to measure it, which they still refuses to do...

  9. #99
    OneDeltaTenTango's Avatar
    OneDeltaTenTango is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Anchorage, Alaska
    Posts
    862
    Quote Originally Posted by RichMahogany View Post
    I forget. Probably calories in/calories out. Or how much butter is appropriate to put in a cup of coffee. Or whether I should paint iodine on my junk before or after sitting in an ice bath.
    You would likely need to use less iodine for complete coverage if applied after the ice bath.

  10. #100
    RichMahogany's Avatar
    RichMahogany is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    6,414
    Quote Originally Posted by Gorbag View Post
    A very pointless discussion until the "general strength " guys defines "strength" and put up the corresponding testing movements to measure it, which they still refuses to do...
    Have to say, I'm perplexed by your request that we somehow try to prove an adaptation is GENERAL by proposing SPECIFIC tests.

Page 10 of 21 FirstFirst ... 8910111220 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •