Originally Posted by

**Gorbag**
Alright Richmahogany: Some hasty calculation to your former question: For the Coca-Cola group: 2250kcal - 10%(thermogenic effect from sugar) = 2,025 “effective” calories, and for the primal group; if we suppose 600 kcal from proteins, 1.450 kcal from fat and 200 kcal from carbs, then we get 2.106 “effective calories”, (minus 30 % from proteins, minus 3% from fat, and minus 10 % from carbs), so the Coca-Cola group will have even less effective calories than the primal group and a higher deficit. Maybe we could subtract something from dietary fibers in the primal group, but there is anyway not much difference between the two groups…