Page 19 of 44 FirstFirst ... 9171819202129 ... LastLast
Results 181 to 190 of 440

Thread: "Calories in / Calories Out" -- Please Stop the Madness page 19

  1. #181
    RichMahogany's Avatar
    RichMahogany is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    6,950
    Shop Now
    Quote Originally Posted by Gorbag View Post
    Calling CICO "a dogma" is like claiming that the law of gravitation is "a dogma"!
    No. You're trying to falsely conflate CICO with the 1st law of Thermodynamics.

    Here's Peter Attia's statement of the Alternative Hypothesis: "Obesity is a growth disorder just like any other growth disorder. Specifically, obesity is a disorder of excess fat accumulation. Fat accumulation is determined not by the balance of calories consumed and expended but by the effect of specific nutrients on the hormonal regulation of fat metabolism. Obesity is a condition where the body prioritizes the storage of fat rather than the utilization of fat."

    The CICO proponents all too often fail to understand what they're arguing against. Give this a shot: Do calories matter? The Eating Academy | Peter Attia, M.D. The Eating Academy | Peter Attia, M.D.

  2. #182
    RichMahogany's Avatar
    RichMahogany is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    6,950
    Quote Originally Posted by Gorbag View Post
    Calling CICO "a dogma" is like claiming that the law of gravitation is "a dogma"!
    No. You're trying to falsely conflate CICO with the 1st law of Thermodynamics.

    Here's Peter Attia's statement of the Alternative Hypothesis: "Obesity is a growth disorder just like any other growth disorder. Specifically, obesity is a disorder of excess fat accumulation. Fat accumulation is determined not by the balance of calories consumed and expended but by the effect of specific nutrients on the hormonal regulation of fat metabolism. Obesity is a condition where the body prioritizes the storage of fat rather than the utilization of fat."

    The CICO proponents all too often fail to understand what they're arguing against. Give this a shot: http://eatingacademy.com/nutrition/do-calories-matter

  3. #183
    magnolia1973's Avatar
    magnolia1973 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    3,851
    Unless one of you is in considerably better shape than everyone else, and have attained it with minimal effort, then I don't think anyone's got any right to say everyone else is wrong.
    LOL, except for even then, everyone has a different body.

    Like I think there are some guys here that need never worry about counting calories and it makes sense. A 25 year old guy that cross fits 5 days a week then mountain climbs on the weekend really has nothing to worry about. But that 51 year old woman in menopause that is sedentary with a thyroid issue is going to have to restrict calories in some way/shape or form, whether or not she eats carbs.

    I look at calories as a budget. We all have our own budget. Maybe you make minimum wage, maybe you make six figures. It's a lot harder to manage things on minimum wage than on six figures. And "budget suggestions" for the guy that makes six figures are irrelevant to someone at minimum wage.

    It's probably why weight loss is so hard...no one answer!

    http://maggiesfeast.wordpress.com/
    Check out my blog. Hope to share lots of great recipes and ideas!

  4. #184
    Lumifer's Avatar
    Lumifer is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    116
    LOL. Do calories matter? Peter Attia's very first sentence is: "In a word, yes." :-)

    But if you want to get back to the source, you can quote Taubes in GCBC.

  5. #185
    diene's Avatar
    diene is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Northeastern U.S.
    Posts
    1,660
    I think calories do matter, but I don't think that "eat less, move more" is always the answer. If you have someone who already works out a lot, e.g., someone who does moderate to vigorous workouts for 40-90 minutes six times a week, and then you put them on a low-calorie diet, say 1200 calories per day for a woman of average size. This person would probably start experiencing some degree of thyroid suppression very soon after being placed on such a regimen. And that's going to cause them to not lose weight. And if they ever started eating more again, they may even gain weight very quickly.

    Biological organisms are complex. We're not engines that simply burn fuel. That doesn't mean that calories don't matter, but it also doesn't mean that calories are all that matters. It's just more complicated than that.

  6. #186
    Gorbag's Avatar
    Gorbag is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    3,580
    Quote Originally Posted by RichMahogany View Post
    No. You're trying to falsely conflate CICO with the 1st law of Thermodynamics.

    Here's Peter Attia's statement of the Alternative Hypothesis: "Obesity is a growth disorder just like any other growth disorder. Specifically, obesity is a disorder of excess fat accumulation. Fat accumulation is determined not by the balance of calories consumed and expended but by the effect of specific nutrients on the hormonal regulation of fat metabolism. Obesity is a condition where the body prioritizes the storage of fat rather than the utilization of fat."

    The CICO proponents all too often fail to understand what they're arguing against. Give this a shot: Do calories matter? The Eating Academy | Peter Attia, M.D. The Eating Academy | Peter Attia, M.D.
    So what? Attia talks about fat accumulation and bodycomposition, nobody disagrees that you can lose weight and end up skinnyfat on a bad diet without any exercise, but you still lose weight in accordanse to CICO! But what does losing weight really mean according to CICO? It means that you loses calories stored as fat, glycogen or protein from your body! How many calories contain an average body then? Maybe around 200,000 calories, and a calorie deficit of 500 per day will make a person lose 3,500 kcal per week from his body - but it says nothing about where it comes from! If losing fat, well everybody knows that a pound of fat contains around 3,500 kcal. But muscle? One pound contains only around 600 kcal, and the pound of glycogen stored in our bodies gives less than 2000 kcal.

    When losing or gaining weight CICO dictates loss or gain of calories from the body, fluctuations in body water or bodycomposition is irrelevant due to this principle...

  7. #187
    RichMahogany's Avatar
    RichMahogany is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    6,950
    Quote Originally Posted by Lumifer View Post
    LOL. Do calories matter? Peter Attia's very first sentence is: "In a word, yes." :-)

    But if you want to get back to the source, you can quote Taubes in GCBC.
    Exactly! Of course they matter. Did you read the rest of the link?

    My entire point was that if you define CICO as the First Law of Thermodynamics, it's entirely true (because you're measuring what happened, and the calories are simply a measure of energy).

    But when you tell someone who's spent years trying unsuccessfully to lose weight by eating less and moving more that they're A. lying about their food intake and/or B. lazy, you do them a serious disservice.

    And for the record, I own both Good Calories, Bad Calories and Why We Get Fat (which I've described as a book report on Good Calories, Bad Calories). But neither are in front of me at the moment.

  8. #188
    RichMahogany's Avatar
    RichMahogany is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    6,950
    Quote Originally Posted by Gorbag View Post
    When losing or gaining weight CICO dictates loss or gain of calories from the body, fluctuations in body water or bodycomposition is irrelevant due to this principle...
    No. CICO measures loss or gain of calories from the body. You've got the horse and the cart reversed.

  9. #189
    RichMahogany's Avatar
    RichMahogany is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    6,950
    Quote Originally Posted by serenity View Post
    Biological organisms are complex. We're not engines that simply burn fuel. That doesn't mean that calories don't matter, but it also doesn't mean that calories are all that matters. It's just more complicated than that.
    Beautifully said.

  10. #190
    Silvergirl's Avatar
    Silvergirl is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    502
    Quote Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369 View Post
    You are eating more food volume but less calories. Whole foods are far less calorically dense than processed foods. You can eat a big steak for the same calories as a piece of cake, the calories will be mostly protein-based (superior for body composition) and you'll stay full for hours in the steak whereas the cake may make you hungrier. It's that simple.
    Ahhh! but on those diets I wasn't eating cake....... on Weight Watchers I was tracking my points and eating only around 18 to actually be able to lose any weight. Virtually no fat, very low quantity food. Bfst typically a small low fat yogurt, or 1/3 cup of oatmeal with a sprinkling of sugar (never ever did the fake stuff) and a bit of 2% milk, or one slice of white toast with a tsp of jam. Lunch half a slice of toast mostly dry with maybe one scrambled egg on top, or the like. Snack a piece of fruit and dinner about 3oz meat with maybe 1/2 small baked potato and bit of corn. A touch of butter, but got to liking the sprinkled Molly Mc Butter. I did stop losing weight on this and was told I wasn't eating enough, so I added a bit more food and did start to lose again. But this was not sustainable for me and as soon as I reached goal weight I was on my way up again. I am pretty certain I eat way more calories on this, after all the diets I have been on I am well aware of what calories are in things. I now eat things like a stack of homemade chicken wings for lunch with skin of course. Coconut oil bark, ghee on everything. I don't believe from my experience it is that simple. I do admit though that I was very careful for a long time when I started this diet to keep my quantities down by eating slowly and stopping early and only having a snack if I got really hungry.
    Starting Primal June 2012 at 148.5lbs, goal weight in November 2012.
    Now 95lbs and holding.
    Primal, minus eggs, dairy and a myriad of other allergens.

Page 19 of 44 FirstFirst ... 9171819202129 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •