Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: Studies assessing the effects of whole grain consumption within a good diet page 3

  1. #21
    KimchiNinja's Avatar
    KimchiNinja is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Seoul
    Posts
    1,254
    Shop Now
    Quote Originally Posted by Bill C View Post
    Back to the request of the OP, I too would like to see a study comparing the presence or absence of whole grains in otherwise equally healthy diets. In other words, a comparison of paleo or primal against, for example, the Mediterranean diet.
    Those studies already exist though right?

    In Price's book "Nutrition and Physical Degeneration" he studies tribes side by side, of the same ancestry, one group like the Swiss villagers eat rye bread and cheese, and other group eats white flour and sugar. The rye bread group is in great health (although perhaps they would be in even better health if they didn't eat the bread, we can't say), while the white flour group is not as hardy and falls sick easily.

    However you are studying a control group here -- a population selected for study because they aren't sick yet, and yes they are doing fine eating rye bread. That's not to say that a population that is already sick, can do fine eating rye bread. For example if a tribe screwed themselves up eating sugar for 100 years, then perhaps that tribe can no longer process the carbohydrates correctly.

    So yes, there were populations who ate "healthy grains" in an otherwise healthy diet, and were healthy. But that doesn't necessarily means the average Amercian can do so and be okay.

    Or so it would seem, since they aren't do so well on their 55% carbs.

  2. #22
    codered5's Avatar
    codered5 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    261
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnOrVladimir View Post
    Im sorry but the studies author is a paleoanthropologist, what are your qualifications to dispute the findings of his study?
    The idea that natura selction stopped when humans developed larger socities is a misunderstanding. Our environment changed drastically, and as a result, natural selection began selecting for a whole new suite of features. Or evolution really has sped up, and continues to speed up. The issue today is no longer how to fight off lions, but that doesnt mean we dont face selective pressures.
    Yeah bc she isnt a paleoanthropologist she is too dumb to interpret data and find holes in it...lol good reasoning Da Vinci..you arent a CW doctor by chance are you?

  3. #23
    KimchiNinja's Avatar
    KimchiNinja is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Seoul
    Posts
    1,254
    Quote Originally Posted by Bill C View Post
    In other words, a comparison of paleo or primal against, for example, the Mediterranean diet.
    There's also this modern study, atkins vs zone (very low carb vs some grains). In the very low carb scenario people lost more weight, higher HDL, lower triglycerides, everything better. Of course there was no control group here, there's one group of screwed up Western society people who are eating various amounts of carbs (grains). And it's not exactly paleo of course because modern studies on that don't exist yet, but it's still a pretty cool study...

    See 22min mark.

    The Battle of the Diets: Is Anyone Winning (At Losing?) - YouTube

  4. #24
    Wal67ter's Avatar
    Wal67ter is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    14
    should satisfy your appeal to authority.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •