Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: 100% Cacao -- quality fat? page

  1. #1
    PrimalStudent's Avatar
    PrimalStudent is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    185

    100% Cacao -- quality fat?

    Primal Fuel
    I'm eating one big meal per day which is packed with quality meat and veggies, so nutrition is not an issue. That big meal comes around 6:00pm. During the rest of the day, I've just been nibbling on a 100% cacao bar (Ghiradelli, no sugar... the entire bar is 4oz) and I find it keeps me really satiated.

    Although I rarely get through all 4oz, is there any problem with doing this? On average I'm doing 3/4ths of a bar, which comes to 412 calories, 43g fat, 26g carbs (half of which is fiber, so only 13g net), and 9.5g protein (although obviously I don't count this towards my daily protein total). It wards off any temptation for the bread and sugar which is around me all day, so I can get home safely to my primal dinner

  2. #2
    PrimalStudent's Avatar
    PrimalStudent is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    185
    (I should note, I'm doing no dairy, no fruit, no nuts... just the cacao, meat, greens, and an avocado here and there)

  3. #3
    noodletoy's Avatar
    noodletoy is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    land of the glass pinecones
    Posts
    1,030
    by itself it's not a bad food, but it's basically just squares of non-nutrition. if you feel compelled to nibble and snack, you either need a bigger meal, or another smallish one during the day. bring some hard-boiled eggs or something.
    i'd be a vegetarian if bacon grew on trees.

  4. #4
    Derpamix's Avatar
    Derpamix is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1,661
    Quote Originally Posted by noodletoy View Post
    by itself it's not a bad food, but it's basically just squares of non-nutrition. if you feel compelled to nibble and snack, you either need a bigger meal, or another smallish one during the day. bring some hard-boiled eggs or something.
    chocolate has a very sizable amount of minerals and has bounds of health benefits. The only problem is the high phosphorus content.
    It brings us closer than dying and cancer and crying

  5. #5
    noodletoy's Avatar
    noodletoy is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    land of the glass pinecones
    Posts
    1,030
    many of which are destroyed by roasting which is needed to turn them into bars. the same cannot be said for eggs, oysters or liver.
    i'd be a vegetarian if bacon grew on trees.

  6. #6
    PrimalStudent's Avatar
    PrimalStudent is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    185
    Quote Originally Posted by noodletoy View Post
    by itself it's not a bad food, but it's basically just squares of non-nutrition. if you feel compelled to nibble and snack, you either need a bigger meal, or another smallish one during the day. bring some hard-boiled eggs or something.
    I just think of it like my version of coconut oil (I know a lot of people take spoonfuls when they're feeling low-energy... I just hate coconut, haha)

  7. #7
    cori93437's Avatar
    cori93437 is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    central FL
    Posts
    6,211
    Quote Originally Posted by noodletoy View Post
    many of which are destroyed by roasting which is needed to turn them into bars. the same cannot be said for eggs, oysters or liver.
    No, sorry... roasting does not destroy the minerals, though the process used can change the content some.
    For instance the iron in dutched cocoa is slightly more available than in regular, but regular favors magnesium.

    Nutrition Facts and Analysis for Cocoa, dry powder, unsweetened, processed with alkali [Dutch cocoa]
    Nutrition Facts and Analysis for Cocoa, dry powder, unsweetened

    My package of organic raw cacao powder at home says this:
    One ounce organic raw cacao powder contains:
    Calories: 120, Calories from Fat: 23
    Total Fat: 2.5g, 4% Recommended daily value
    Saturated Fat: 1.5g, 7%
    Sodium: 20mg, 1%
    Total Carbohydrates: 19.0g, 6%
    Dietary Fiber: 7.0g, 28%
    Protein: 5.0g
    Vitamin A 0%, Vitamin C 0%, Calcium 4%, Iron 16%

    So processing actually increased the iron content per the weight of the product.
    Since my home bag doesn't have an extensive mineral list like Nutritiondata I can't make a full comparison to how it affected the other minerals.
    Our body is our subconscious mind, and anybody who thinks that their conscious mind is running the show is seriously mistaken. In fact the conscious mind just may be the most narcissistic entity in the universe, it thinks it's running the show. It's not.
    ~ Nora Gegaudas

    "Everything can be taken from a man but one thing... -- to choose one's attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one's own way." ~Vicktor Frankl
    And that's why I'm here eating HFLC Primal/Paleo.

  8. #8
    PrimalStudent's Avatar
    PrimalStudent is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    185
    Quote Originally Posted by cori93437 View Post
    No, sorry... roasting does not destroy the minerals, though the process used can change the content some.
    For instance the iron in dutched cocoa is slightly more available than in regular, but regular favors magnesium.

    Nutrition Facts and Analysis for Cocoa, dry powder, unsweetened, processed with alkali [Dutch cocoa]
    Nutrition Facts and Analysis for Cocoa, dry powder, unsweetened

    My package of organic raw cacao powder at home says this:
    One ounce organic raw cacao powder contains:
    Calories: 120, Calories from Fat: 23
    Total Fat: 2.5g, 4% Recommended daily value
    Saturated Fat: 1.5g, 7%
    Sodium: 20mg, 1%
    Total Carbohydrates: 19.0g, 6%
    Dietary Fiber: 7.0g, 28%
    Protein: 5.0g
    Vitamin A 0%, Vitamin C 0%, Calcium 4%, Iron 16%

    So processing actually increased the iron content per the weight of the product.
    Since my home bag doesn't have an extensive mineral list like Nutritiondata I can't make a full comparison to how it affected the other minerals.
    Thanks for your input! saved me having to do that extra research

  9. #9
    noodletoy's Avatar
    noodletoy is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    land of the glass pinecones
    Posts
    1,030
    isn't there a difference between a bar and powder? the latter of which is simply pulverized bits?

    am not trying to be cantankerous.
    i'd be a vegetarian if bacon grew on trees.

  10. #10
    DeeDub's Avatar
    DeeDub is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    347
    Get Support
    Quote Originally Posted by cori93437 View Post
    So processing actually increased the iron content per the weight of the product.
    The extra iron is coming off of the machines doing the processing ("Dutch" cocoa is very highly processed at not "natural" or paleo in any meaningful sense of the word). That's not a joke - companies have been working on "iron-free" processing equipment to reduce this effect - it comes from tiny filings off of the equipment.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •