I don't read it very often as it makes me irritable. It does have things that I agree with sometimes, but it is mixed up with things that I find incomprehensible. For instance, they have a total disregard for civil liberties, whatever the consequences. Today there is something from Melenie Phillips arguing that the civil rights of viewer of Internet pornography are less important that "protecting children" (i.e. stopping 14 yr old boys from looking at mucky pictures). Except that anyone who's not a flaming idiot knows it is impossible to stop 14 yr old boys looking at porn (and don't call them children, real children are not interested, 14 is virtually manhood), while the only way to go about such a ridiculous ban would be to institute a massive Chinese-style system of state control, which apart from being very harmful, would kill the Internet industry stone dead, as well as inevitably criminalising people like me who can set up a web proxy in two minutes flat - not due to watching lots of now-illegal porn but simply because such a system cannot be effective without criminalising the tools of getting round it.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

Reply With Quote

