
Originally Posted by
Kingofturtles
I've been told lately that I need to up my carbs in order to gain strength. Problem is, I try to maintain under 100g of carbs, as per Marks advice.
I've heard people on this forum talk about carb loading sometimes to gain strength. Can someone explain how this would work in relation to the primal diet?
For the record, I was benching 45+25 for the longest time and couldnt go any higher. I went on a family vacation and absolutley destroyed my primal diet, I think I ate pizza 5 days in a row. Anyway, when I cam home I added weight each workout (2.5 at a time) and am now benching 45+45+2.5. Not sure if this is just a coincidence, hopefully it is because I like the health benifits of eating low carb. Insuline control ect...
That doesn't surprise me. Starch is useful for gaining strength, as it supports building and maintaining muscle. Primal for inactive people is essentially a starch elimination diet because primal tells you to count fiber (wtf?) and fructose as carbs. It encourages people to completely eliminate an entire food group - starch.
The blanket label 'carbs' is about as useful as the blanket label 'fats'.
F 5 ft 3. HW: 196 lbs. Primal SW (May 2011): 182 lbs (42% BF)... W June '12: 160 lbs (29% BF) (UK size 12, US size 8). GW: ~24% BF - have ditched the scales til I fit into a pair of UK size 10 bootcut jeans. Currently aligning towards 'The Perfect Health Diet' having swapped some fat for potatoes.