Paleo hasn't affected my politics, more the other way around, really. Ever since high school I've been becoming much more libertarian/minarchist. (I don't think there should be no government, but it should be minute, with most of the power in the individual, then local governments, and then radiate out from there). My beliefs began pulling me towards local and sustainable food and other products for awhile now and then I stumbled upon Cordain's book. We need much less government.
I highly recommend everyone watch John Stossel's "Illegal Everything". Just search Youtube. Quite honesty, while not everyone may agree with the drug or prostitution beliefs, even if you love government, if you can watch that video without going "We have gone way to far", you are either very mentally damaged or a politician...but I repeat myself. (props to Twain!)
We need a revamp of America's political system, big time...it honestly worries me, unless we have a real change towards more personal liberty, personal responsibility, personal reliance, and small and limited government, I really believe our government is just going to become more and more repressive and tyrannical; there are already to many similarities between our government and 1984 to make me feel comfortable....
"Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. Government, like dress, is the badge of lost innocence; the palaces of kings are built upon the ruins of the bowers of paradise. For were the impulses of conscience clear, uniform and irresistibly obeyed, man would need no other lawgiver; but that not being the case, he finds it necessary to surrender up a part of his property to furnish means for the protection of the rest; and this he is induced to do by the same prudence which in every other case advises him, out of two evils to choose the least. Wherefore, security being the true design and end of government, it unanswerably follows that whatever form thereof appears most likely to ensure it to us, with the least expense and greatest benefit, is preferable to all others."
-Thomas Paine
I've thought the same thing. The story of Adam and Eve and the Fall could a story telling memory of humans having to make a hardship transition from the Ice Age Paleolithic into the climate changed Neolithic. We tend to think of the Ice Age as being a time of hardship but at its end a lot of the prey humans relied upon died out and they were force to fall back onto their survival foods such as grains.
Would I be putting a grain-feed cow on a fad diet if I took it out of the feedlot and put it on pasture eating the grass nature intended?
Oooo, read the wikipedia page and it has piqued my interest. Thank you for that suggestion
Never did I say that government was efficient. I stated that humans are good at being efficient, and that we are just operating under an inefficient government system. We make changes gradually that make the government system more efficient, but I believe that advancement of technology must play a role in that.
Efficiency isn't a priority - it's embedded in our nature. It's embedded in nature, period. Because once we do an action, there will be something else in the system to balance it. And that is very efficient.
No, you wouldn't want to think it like that. But in the big picture, it's true. He is a unit of production, and is valuable to others just as he finds value in others. He can be happy and sad and everything that goes with emotional well-being. But in the end, that's what man really is.
So, there is basically someone who doesn't value something as much as you. So, what? Doesn't that just mean that you will be satisfied with less, and basically will be hurt less by anything that hits you because you are easily satisfied? I'm not saying that it's an ideal situation to be, emotionally, to not be able to make as much money as someone who is immoral or less capable at a certain skill as you. But it balances. They will be hit harder when times get rough, just like they benefit more when times are good.
True, but I don't know how else to describe it. The world in which we live in is a system, with all the intangible interlinked connections, interlinked resources, means of production, etc. And right now it's inefficient.
Thank you![]()
Murray Rothbard is real good too, like his language is plain and grasp of the deeper issues is evident in even the lighter commentary.
But I should say in fairness that I have a lot of issues with the "free-market" crowd and regularly engage in flame warfare on forums with their many boring conformist ayn rand wanna-be protestant-ethic obsolete prophets.
I thought that you said, "but this system seems to be the most efficent now," or something to that effect.Never did I say that government was efficient. I stated that humans are good at being efficient, and that we are just operating under an inefficient government system. We make changes gradually that make the government system more efficient, but I believe that advancement of technology must play a role in that.
I wouldn't argue that we are bad at efficiency, but would add that government exists to limit that tendency.
Really? I think that we move toward INstability and IMbalance with action- when a father smacks a kid, that kid goes to school and smacks a class-mate, who goes home and smacks his dog, whose mother smacks his father. lol The first smacked kid doesn't go out and hug a cripple or protect the gay kid at school or some shit.Efficiency isn't a priority - it's embedded in our nature. It's embedded in nature, period. Because once we do an action, there will be something else in the system to balance it. And that is very efficient.
a unit of production? lolNo, you wouldn't want to think it like that. But in the big picture, it's true. He is a unit of production, and is valuable to others just as he finds value in others. He can be happy and sad and everything that goes with emotional well-being. But in the end, that's what man really is.
We the final product baby.
...So, there is basically someone who doesn't value something as much as you. So, what? Doesn't that just mean that you will be satisfied with less, and basically will be hurt less by anything that hits you because you are easily satisfied?
uhhh no. LOL that's how you took it? No it means that I have to tell my wife, "Sue gets to go on vacation because she is good at lying and stealing money, and has no job consequently. You have to get back to work baby." Fuck sue- if I honestly thought that I could succeed in doing so, I'd get on a dirt bike and murder everyone like her until I came to the shores at the end of the continent.
no when times are tough the government and its parasite attachments get fatter.I'm not saying that it's an ideal situation to be, emotionally, to not be able to make as much money as someone who is immoral or less capable at a certain skill as you. But it balances. They will be hit harder when times get rough, just like they benefit more when times are good.
no- the world just is. I thought you were into Asian traditions...lol What about Lao Tsu? Siddhartha? "System" is how your ego makes sense of what is happening around you.True, but I don't know how else to describe it. The world in which we live in is a system, with all the intangible interlinked connections, interlinked resources, means of production, etc. And right now it's inefficient.
"Ah, those endless forests, and their horror-haunted gloom! For what eternities have I wandered through them, a timid, hunted creature, starting at the least sound, frightened of my own shadow, keyed-up, ever alert and vigilant, ready on the instant to dash away in mad flight for my life. For I was the prey of all manner of fierce life that dwelt in the forest, and it was in ecstasies of fear that I fled before the hunting monsters."
Jack london, "Before Adam"
I have found that the Paleo way is very compatible with a liberty-minded-Ron-Paul-damn-the-man kind of attitude...
My kind of people. Heck, even over at Ron Paul Forums, there is a thread on Paleo... One of the greatest minds in Libertarian circles, namely Tom Woods, just went Paleo!
Re-Starting Paleo January 10, 2013
SW - 185.4 lbs Janury 10, 2013
CW- 179.8 lbs
Goal- 168 lbs Full Performance Level PBF, 32" waist, lean...
MY PALEO JOURNAL
"The trouble with quotes on the internet is that it is often difficult to verify their authenticity."
~ Abraham Lincoln