I feel no need to "defend" yoga, but rather explain this process from a "yoga" point of view. it's where my experience lies, predominately (seeing as it's my career!). I agree that we are essentially saying the same things.
Also, instead of using a subjective standard like "ripped" which is as unscientific/mythic as "toned," we can use terms like 'strength gains' and "muscle size development" which of course we both described.
Likewise, I know this sequencing intimately (i practiced and taught it for years, and much of what I teach is a variation on it) and I know what certain aspects of this series of movements works specifically. A lot of it is focused on back strength (and of course, general strength). A lot of my clients -- women mostly -- develop a lot more back muscle than they used to carry there.
Now, since "ripped" is subjective, I have seen my clients and they look "ripped" for women. Even my female clients, aged 55 and older, who don't lift weights. They are getting leaner, and their muscles are developing. "ripped" for most women means "more muscle and less fat than toned."
As such, I would say that this poster -- BestBetter -- being a woman and seeing these results so quickly (since it is volume movement with an emphasis on developing the back body) is, in fact, seeing herself as "ripped."
A man, getting the same level of development and fat loss would not be considered "ripped" because "ripped" on a man implies MOAR size.
But again, it's a useless term, really. She could say "I'm finding myself far leaner and with much more muscle development on my back than I ever have before, since I started doing Baptiste Power Yoga." which is essentially what she said anyhoot.



LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote



