I'm eating only fat/protein, not a fan of potatoes
I have a question now, what's the difference if i eat enough at one sitting and fast the rest of the day compared to eating throughout the day, but same amount of calories?
I find calorie restriction within the primal framework of healthy food and moderate exercise to be a terrific way to lose weight. If you are going to calorie restrict for more than a week, I've found that setting aside one or two days a week where I eat maintenance calories keeps me from going into hibernation mode. I've also found that if I hit a plateau of more than two weeks without weight lost, eating one day of about 2000 calories jump starts the weight loss again.
That's what works for me. I have no idea if it works for anyone else on the planet.
"Right is right, even if no one is doing it; wrong is wrong, even if everyone is doing it." - St. Augustine
Who says back fat is a bad thing? Maybe on a hairy guy at the beach, but not on a crab.
Four years Primal with influences from Jaminet & Shanahan and a focus on being anti-inflammatory. Using Primal to treat CVD and prevent stents from blocking free of drugs.
Eat creatures nose-to-tail (animal, fowl, fish, crustacea, molluscs), a large variety of vegetables (raw, cooked and fermented, including safe starches), dairy (cheese & yoghurt), occasional fruit, cocoa, turmeric & red wine
Yea before i started PB, i followed the 3 meals and 3 snacks plan. I was never hungry, but changes took too long
Don't believe the whole aging hype. Long term caloric RESTRICTION might age you, but we're not doing that. We're eating to normal caloric levels over the course of a week or so and just allowing our bodies to enter fat-burning mode by giving them a chance to rest between meals.
Oh, and Brad Pilon is a HORRIBLE example of the aging assertion because he does NOT eat primal. Yes he fasts, but... He eats grains, sugars, bad oils, and suffers all of the effects from them. You're hopefully eating much, MUCH healthier than he is.