
Originally Posted by
Drumroll
There might actually be some sort of a correlation to overall IQ (doubtful but even if there is), but having worked with people who have severe developmental disabilities, I've learned that a low IQ does not preclude the ability to learn or developing intelligence later in life. I know more than a handful of individuals with Down Syndrome who are extremely low of IQ, but savants in their own right.
Absolute truth. High IQ is basically a fast and efficient processing ability. It doesn't equate to total intelligence. It can be a good INDICATOR (especially when grouped in tens, rather than units), but never spot-on. For true intelligence, you need processing ability, but also high levels of creativity (or a low-latent-inhibition, if you want to search the scientific analysis), emotional stability, motivation and low levels of procastination/ability to get distracted.
Someone with an IQ of 140 may be unimaginative, unstable and an incorrigible procastinator, making their overall intelligence (and their impact on the world) lower than that of someone with an IQ of 110 who's more creative and motivated.
Sadly we don't yet have a test to measure overall intelligence, so we use IQ (processing power) and assorted tests to try and work out who's best suited to something (a job, a school, a test...).
And this isn't me justifying a low IQ, btw. Mine is 126-132 (lowest and highest scores) and I know there are people out there with IQs of 100 who are better at maths, less likely to procastinate...etc, which could make some of them have a much higher overall intelligence!
I rarely talk to people about Paleo/Primal, but, when I do, it's when they're NOT complaining about their weight or health.
You see, I don't really "do" pity. And one thing I've learned about people is that they're more open to suggestion when they're happy and stable. When they complain they only ever want pity, not to be advised.