a lot of what ray peat writes, and what danny tries to explain, is interesting, but some is so far off the broad scientific consensus (yeah, i know, conventional wisdom), that i feel it behooves him to prove his claims a bit better. rejecting the model of cells with walls and pressure gradients? wow... and for hormones, he looks at really early science and seems to ignore volumes of data we've amassed since then. kinda weird.
i'm also not convinced that a high body temperature and fast heart beat automatically equal health & vitality. that's awfully simplistic.
"dean ornish and dr. davis think the palmitic acid our bodies use for fuel while we sleep is poison if we eat it. zero-carbers like charles washington think the oldest fuel in our evolutionary history – glucose - used by organisms a billion years ago and without which the brains of modern mammals cannot survive for more than a few minutes – is an unnatural toxin if you eat it. both views ignore basic facts of medical physiology and defy evolutionary history." - kurt harris