
Originally Posted by
Scott F
I hear you. Now reps are arguing again for a ban on "assault weapons". The excuse is that there is no reason for having one of these for hunting. Is that true? No. So if anyone makes a claim to the contrary here's the argument for why it isn't true. Since pictures are speak graphically......
nice work on the feral hog argument
the issue with "assault rifles" is just that. there are no such thing as publicly available assault rifles. fully automatic and burts-firing weapons are illegal. they dimwits are talking about semi automatic rifles that look like, and are often manufactured by the makers of actual assault weapons. but they are semi automatic. just like many shotguns and countless other rifles you can buy. take for example the marlin model 60. a 22 caliber rifle that holds 15 rounds and is semi automatic. perfectly legal. but because it looks like grandpa's rifle and not a "machine gun" this rifle is apparently harmless. oh, and btw, the marlin model 60 is the most popolar 22 in the world. or how about the remington model 1100? one of the most time tested and popular semi-automatic shotguns on the market. excellent for waterfowl hunting or competition shooting. looks like a gun my grandfather would carry. but because these "assault rifles" are chambered in a different caliber and dressed up with some lightweight composite materials, they are inherently more dangerous that the marlin model 60? this is the twisted logic the anti's try to force feed the ignorant sheeple in our society.
I have a lot of hard miles on my body from before I realized I'm not 100% invulnerable. Now I just think I'm 75% invulnerable. -Mr. Anthony