
Originally Posted by
pklopp
With those numbers, assuming you are male, of average height, and between 40 - 60 years of age, you were eating about 1150 kcal. per day, and your BMR requirements are anywhere between 1800 - 2000 kcal. So, you were at 58% - 65% of your BMR. Were you to not lose weight on such a protocol I would be stunned.
If you were eating at those levels and not feeling hungry, that is indeed impressive, but then we would need to discuss satiation vs. satiety, where satiation == your body is fed, and satiety == you are fed up ( with eating so many potatoes ).
Nevertheless, congratulations on your progress.
-PK
Hi PK thanks mate, I am stoked to have broken thru a stall point and feel better carry around 6 kegs less.
6'2" male 43 years old and pretty active. Cheap Scales say 21% BF but I think I more in the 18-20%. would calculate BMR at 2500 to 3000 with what I do exercise wise, so to loose a lb a day is about right on a 2000 cal def as I am also sure there is also a metabolic boost with the change in gut bacteria.
To answer your other questions, yes that's really what I ate, about a kilo of spuds a day or 5-6 cups of rice. I was hungry at times but found a cold spud or a couple of mouthfuls of cooked rice would see me right. I also had the odd cup of beef stock (16 cals per cup) to stave off hunger to see me to the next boiled spud...
I have a question for you... Have you been to rays site and read his blog and the comments? If you have any major concerns or scientific questions you should send him an email or post a comment on his site. He only chose spuds as they are seen as an evil high GI carb.... I am sure it would work as advertised with other starchy foods that get converted to glucose readily in the gut.
Keep questioning and challenging things PK that's how we all learn and grow.
Cheers
"Times fun when you are having Flies" Kermit the frog