Page 90 of 109 FirstFirst ... 40808889909192100 ... LastLast
Results 891 to 900 of 1081

Thread: EAT MOAR TATERS! Huh? page 90

  1. #891
    TCOHTom's Avatar
    TCOHTom is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    SW Ohio
    Posts
    270
    Shop Now
    Quote Originally Posted by Owl View Post
    Way too high! I tested the 1 hour twice, so it's no mistake. Needless to say, I immediately quit the diet.
    I recommend all of you to test your glucose.
    If you've been vlc for awhile you'd expect that result. Once you've accustomed yourself to higher carb intake those readings should normalize. (Assuming you didn't have chronic high blood sugar readings prior to potatoes)
    Retirement has afforded me the ultimate affluence, that of free time (Sahlins/Wells)

  2. #892
    otzi's Avatar
    otzi Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by AlanC View Post
    Because you triggered an insulin release with the taste/expectation, but spat it out so the insulin was just storing what little glucose it could find?



    AC
    Yep! insulin is released in two phases. The first phase can be triggered when amylase receptors in the mouth detect starch. It's the only food that does this.

    If you look at my glucose curve, you can see it paused at 116 for about 30 minutes, then quickly climbed. This is because the first phase insulin response was not enough to clear all the glucose that was released from the digestion of one pound of potato. As the starch was digested, a second phase of insulin release, much larger than the first, was needed to clear the glucose.

    This is basically what the doctor is doing when he administers a 2 or 4hr glucose tolerance test.

  3. #893
    Owl's Avatar
    Owl
    Owl is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    309
    Quote Originally Posted by Paysan View Post
    However, for a diagnosed diabetic, your numbers are considered not only acceptable, but good if on no medications right after meals. It was under the 2 hr limit when your sugars reverted to 96. (Not that I accept my doc's reassurance that hubby's numbers are great, either. I've seen them too high - like 7.4 (fasting overnight after taters for last meal) shoot right up into the teens and stay there for too long).
    Doctors are way too lenient on BG with diabetics. So, yes, they would probably be happy with mine, but see below for why it's probably not safe.



    Quote Originally Posted by gopintos View Post
    I have no idea what mine are. Is there any other way to know spikes aside from testing, like a feeling or something? I always feel just fine, but I never have had 1lb at one sitting either. I usually have a tator here and there, about 5 oz at a time.
    There is no real indication that BG is high, I didn't feel any difference. That's why diabetics can do so much damage to themselves before they're diagnosed.


    Quote Originally Posted by TCOHTom View Post
    If you've been vlc for awhile you'd expect that result. Once you've accustomed yourself to higher carb intake those readings should normalize. (Assuming you didn't have chronic high blood sugar readings prior to potatoes)
    I've been eating 75-100 gm carbs/day. I normally have fasting BG of 83-87, and post prandial, maybe 120 if I have fruit.
    But the problem is that BG over 140 does damage to your organs.

    According to Blood Sugar 101 Research Connecting Organ Damage with Blood Sugar Level :
    "Nerve Damage Occurs when Blood Sugars Rise Over 140 mg/dl (7.8 mmol/L) After Meals."

    And here's their page on what normal BG is: What is a Normal Blood Sugar? :

    "Fasting - Between 70 mg/dl (3.9 mmol/L) and 92 mg/dl (5.0 mmol/L)
    Post-Meal Blood Sugar (Postprandial) - Under 120 mg/dl (6.6 mmol/L) one or two hours after a meal. Most normal people are under 100 mg/dl (5.5 mmol/L) two hours after eating."

    I don't want to lose weight while doing permanent damage to myself. It's just not worth it.
    Some people may be able to do this potato diet keeping theirs under 140, which would be fairly safe.

  4. #894
    Quarry's Avatar
    Quarry is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    189
    Interesting about the blood glucose response guys, thanks for the links

  5. #895
    AlanC's Avatar
    AlanC is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Tropics
    Posts
    139
    But that is indeed showing what it should be 1 or 2 hours after...?

  6. #896
    Owl's Avatar
    Owl
    Owl is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    309
    Quote Originally Posted by AlanC View Post
    But that is indeed showing what it should be 1 or 2 hours after...?
    after...the moment you start eating.

    "2-hour postprandial blood sugar measures blood glucose exactly 2 hours after you start eating a meal."

  7. #897
    otzi's Avatar
    otzi Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by AlanC View Post
    But that is indeed showing what it should be 1 or 2 hours after...?
    I think Owl's fears are unfounded, but it all relates to his comfort zone, so it's all good! I think if Owl (not picking on you) eats a 'regular' meal, say, some meat, veg, and a little rice and checks his BG 2 hours after, his levels will be perfect. When eating just a bunch of potatoes, they will probably be a little higher. With the regular meal, the protein and fat slow the absorption of the starch and cause other interactions such as CCK release which just starch don't do.

    So, maybe Owl's right...spending a week or two spiking your insulin to abnormal levels may be 'bad' for you. Then again, maybe it's good and leads to improved insulin sensitivity. Hmmm.

  8. #898
    Quarry's Avatar
    Quarry is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    189
    Isn't high insulin associated with resistance, not sensitivity?

  9. #899
    Terry H's Avatar
    Terry H is online now Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    982
    bingo!

  10. #900
    otzi's Avatar
    otzi Guest
    Primal Blueprint Expert Certification
    Quote Originally Posted by Quarry View Post
    Isn't high insulin associated with resistance, not sensitivity?
    Prolonged high insulin definitely correlates to insulin resistance (or diabetes). High blood glucose levels, especially fasting, indicate insulin resistance as well. What we have been talking about here is spikes in blood glucose. The spike will prompt a surge in insulin which will clear the glucose from the blood in an insulin sensitive person.



    Normal glucose levels are important to good health and the next blood sugar chart shows the fasting level for a normal person and then the raising and falling of blood sugar after a meal.

    Let's see if this link works: It shows normal variances over 24 hours for 21 insulin sensitive people, eating regular food.

    http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_tMgToYs_oY...ndividuals.PNG

    Here's another good chart to show what levels should be at certain times:

    http://anormalbloodsugarlevel.com/bl...-levels-chart/
    Last edited by otzi; 11-10-2012 at 09:33 AM.

Page 90 of 109 FirstFirst ... 40808889909192100 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •