Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Increasing polyunsaturated fats lowers heart disease risk? (New study) page

  1. #1
    oneuncoolmom's Avatar
    oneuncoolmom is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    13

    Increasing polyunsaturated fats lowers heart disease risk? (New study)

    Primal Fuel
    Has anyone seen &/or analyzed a new study (meta-analysis) just published by Harvard School of Public Health in which they claim that when people consumed more polyunsaturated fats and fewer saturated fats, their risk of heart disease decreased? Just when I have finally been convinced that Primal/Paleo eating is the healthiest, this study comes out. PLEASE read the article in the link below and COMMENT!!

    http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/...l.pmed.1000252

  2. #2
    Molecular Grokologist's Avatar
    Molecular Grokologist is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    303
    http://wholehealthsource.blogspot.co...n-at-door.html

    They cherry-picked their studies, their studies weren't really comparable, and many of the studies were poorly controlled to boot. What's more, the effect they managed to produce with all their data manipulation was still pretty small.
    Give me liberty. Exploration of other options will be vigorously discouraged.

    Wondering something sciencey? Ask me in my Ask a Biochemist Thread

  3. #3
    oneuncoolmom's Avatar
    oneuncoolmom is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    13
    Thank you, Molecular Grokologist, for your analysis and explanation here and on your blogspot. It is so disheartening to know that researchers who should be high caliber (Harvard) and journal referrees defend studies like this. But, poor studies have been going on for decades as Gary Taubes discusses throughout Good Calories, Bad Calories. Onward with the Primal/Paleo diet.............
    Thank you.

  4. #4
    Molecular Grokologist's Avatar
    Molecular Grokologist is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    303
    Oh, it's not my blog. I wish I could take credit for that, but I am not, alas, Stephan Guyenet.
    Give me liberty. Exploration of other options will be vigorously discouraged.

    Wondering something sciencey? Ask me in my Ask a Biochemist Thread

  5. #5
    hazyjane's Avatar
    hazyjane is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    1,264
    Get Support
    We always have to take these "findings" with a grain of salt since:
    (1. they are usually funded by pharma/agra companies (as admitted by the editor of the NEJM- his excuse being that they can't find any studies that aren't!) and studies are sometimes fraudulent. Example:
    http://www.naturalnews.com/023920_ca..._medicine.html

    (2. The studies themselves are very often misrepresented in the media articles we read about them. Example:

    I remember reading an article about the skewed world of scientific studies and how they're reported. The example was an incident involving a study by Vanderbilt University comparing St. John's Wort to Zoloft. The study read "St. John's Wort Ineffective for Depression". What they didn't bother to report was that Zoloft also tested completely ineffective for depression. They buried that bit!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •