Just one, maybe two questions.
With regards to the assessment of Soy value to nutrition in the article introduction:
On a good-bad scale, they probably come in at a 35:65 ratio, with the 65 lined up on the negative side.
On the basis of the way Soy is marketed to general consumers and incorporated into a wide range of food products, and without justifications and qualifiers please, as I have taken the time to look at the pro Soy arguments you have presented here and in the past.

Do you agree with that statement?
If not what ratio would you put the Soy pro's & con's at?

If you can not answer this in one or two lines, please don't bother answering at all.

For the record I agree with the article and feel that the 35:65 ratio of Pro's vs Con's is fairly appropriate given all the evidence I have seen.