09-23-2012, 08:41 PM
Just one, maybe two questions.
With regards to the assessment of Soy value to nutrition in the article introduction:
On the basis of the way Soy is marketed to general consumers and incorporated into a wide range of food products, and without justifications and qualifiers please, as I have taken the time to look at the pro Soy arguments you have presented here and in the past.
On a good-bad scale, they probably come in at a 35:65 ratio, with the 65 lined up on the negative side.
Do you agree with that statement?
If not what ratio would you put the Soy pro's & con's at?
If you can not answer this in one or two lines, please don't bother answering at all.
For the record I agree with the article and feel that the 35:65 ratio of Pro's vs Con's is fairly appropriate given all the evidence I have seen.