yes, but how do they compare to people who eat no grains? I ask ya.
yes, but how do they compare to people who eat no grains? I ask ya.
It's based on the assumption that everybody eats grains. The people who eat whole grains would weigh less than the people who eat simple carbs like white bread etc.
Last edited by Lukey; 09-10-2012 at 03:18 AM.
The latter. This is similar to the studies that state those who eat breakfast are healthier. It's a simple correlation; basically those who eat breakfast are doing so because they're trying to be "healthy" and therefore weigh less than the average person who skips breakfast. Similar logical fallacy here.
I recently read an article from 2008 to that affect, well it was whole grain over refined grain actually. They needed a 3rd study group of no grains, but it was funded in part by The General Mills Bell Institute of Health and Human Nutrition. hmmmm
70lbs gone and counting!!
Fat 2 Fit - One Woman's Journey
Correlation does not equal causation.![]()
Shouldn't this be in the "funny CW moments" thread?!?![]()
Eating primal is not a diet, it is a way of life.
PS
Don't forget to play!
People who are babies tend to weigh less than people who are adults.
70lbs gone and counting!!
Fat 2 Fit - One Woman's Journey