
Originally Posted by
urbancaveman
Ok, in the UK we've had a really crap summer! with probably on 2 weeks of real summer weather! However now that autumn and winter are fast approaching I wanted to post this question.
I presume that paleolithically Grok would have had a bit of trouble in the winter, seeing how the abundance of nuts, fruit and meat would not necessarily be readily available. But this day and age, food is available in abundance all year round and so should one be fasting more because of what grok would have had to endure, or accept that we live in the modern age and eat as if it is summer during the winter months?
Well, the ocean isn't frozen up there. British Grok may have still had access to foods of the sea. And when it is cooler, foods can be preserved such as tubers, roots, winter squashes (which is why they are called that), not to mention nuts and seeds. And animals and birds, large and small, still are in existence and out foraging for themselves during the winter, leaving lots of nice tracks in the snow, making them somewhat easier to find. I have no idea what foods an ancient human would have eaten in England, but I would guess that there's not NOTHING to eat.
I'm lucky living where I am. The native people's had tremendous food available year round. They were some of the best-fed native Americans in existence. They had so much abundance they were sedentary rather than nomadic and spent much of their time engaging in warfare to defend their territory, which means that they often died of injury and infection. There's always some trade-off.
Female, 5'3", 48, Starting weight: 163lbs. Current weight: 135.
Starting bench press: 30lbs. Current bench press: 75lbs.