Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Interesting New Study - Nutritional Data on Almonds page

  1. #1
    Graycat's Avatar
    Graycat is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    1,933

    Interesting New Study - Nutritional Data on Almonds

    Primal Fuel
    I just came across this article.
    It's really "sciency" and from what I gather it seems that because of the way most people digest them, almonds don't have the amount of fat and calories as previously thought.

    ETA. For some reason the link posted above is broken.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...4/?tool=pubmed

  2. #2
    Leida's Avatar
    Leida is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    Posts
    5,785
    Well, that balances out a touch sneaking an extra almond or two....
    My Journal: http://www.marksdailyapple.com/forum/thread57916.html
    When I let go of what I am, I become what I might be.

  3. #3
    Dirlot's Avatar
    Dirlot is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Edmonton Canada
    Posts
    2,477
    It can't be right because a calorie is just a calorie....kidding. It does explain differences people find when eating certain ways if the calories are not what they seem.

    I did find this part of the article very interesting.

    The digestibility of macronutrients and energy from the diet as a whole was significantly affected by the addition of almonds to the diet (Table 3).

    It does give credence to the "there is more going on than just calories in vs calories out" crowd.

    It goes to show you really need to listen to your body.
    Eating primal is not a diet, it is a way of life.
    PS
    Don't forget to play!

  4. #4
    MissJecka's Avatar
    MissJecka is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    651
    A lot of my fitness and foodie friends have been chattering about this lately. I think it's very interesting and never realized before how old the method for determining energy in food is! I think it's about time that a more modern (and hopefully accurate) method has been created. I hope that they can verify the results to some level of confidence before everyone gets all giddy over the news and prices of nuts skyrocket!

  5. #5
    plastic's Avatar
    plastic is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    24
    The most commonly used method is calculation according to the Atwater factors. However, both sets of Atwater factors fall short, which renders the information on food labels and in databases flawed and of lesser value, at least for nuts.

    Nuts are a food group for which the Atwater factors may be particularly poorly suited. A key component of the Atwater factors is the coefficient of digestibility. Numerous studies and varied evidence suggest that the coefficient of digestibility for nuts and peanuts is different from that for other foods
    "Therefore, it can be assumed that macronutrients (and therefore energy) from whole peanuts were less available than those from peanut butter and peanut oil."
    "These studies support the premise that the coefficient of digestibility for at least fat from nuts is significantly less than that for other foods."

    seems unlikely anyone has an accurate measure of what they're putting in their bodies, if I'm understanding this and extrapolating correctly..

  6. #6
    palebluedots's Avatar
    palebluedots is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    342
    Primal Blueprint Expert Certification
    Another interesting tidbit: your body absorbs up to 30% fewer calories from raw food than from cooked. I was reading Richard Wrangham's book Catching Fire (which talks about the history of fire, great read), and he talks about that in great detail. It really caught my attention because I was a raw vegan at the time.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •