Page 46 of 69 FirstFirst ... 36444546474856 ... LastLast
Results 451 to 460 of 686

Thread: The True Definition of Calories i.e. "Why what you believe is extremist BS" page 46

  1. #451
    BestBetter's Avatar
    BestBetter is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    sunshine state
    Posts
    1,220
    Quote Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369 View Post


    You need to get fat. Because it's the only way you'll get thin. You need to seriously get rid of your scale, because it's your biggest downfall. You will never succeed if you check your weight daily because you will not hold to a plan. You need to take the next YEAR and just eat normally. And you shouldn't weigh yourself once. Go an entire 365 days without knowing what your weight or inches are. Just fucking do it. And don't go hungry once. Don't IF, don't count calories/carbs/grams of fat, etc. Don't rinse your ground beef. Don't use the little lines on the butter sleeve to measure out how much you should be using to sear meat in. You'll probably gain 10-20 lbs. And you need to. The ONLY way you'll ever lose your body fat is if you spend a really, really long time not being hungry. It's the only way your body will figure out that it doesn't NEED to carry body fat. You've done nothing but tell it to hold onto fat and burn up your muscles for years.

    Stop dieting. Stop weighing. Stop measuring. Just eat a lot of food and get fat. And stay fat for a really long time. If you don't, you will never exceed.
    I'm not saying that this COULDN'T be good advice for some people, but i am an example of how this absolutely does not work (for me). I've had YEARS of eating just about whatever I wanted, and while I never got over 125, I also never been able to lose the extra fat no matter what kind of restriction I tried, caloric or macro.

    The only way I've ever been able to lose fat is by eating VERY low fat (as in 5-10 grams per day, usually) and low carb (which was also very low calorie). This results in the top half of me looking emaciated, while the bottom half is still chubby. My body would probably rather die than give up that stubborn fat, and no amount of overeating is going to change that.

    I think we just have to face that some people are meant to be thin and lean (like SBhike's sister) and some of us are not, no matter what we do or eat. This doesn't mean we still shouldn't strive to eat healthy, but no amount of food/diet manipulation will ever result in looking good for the lucky winners in this group.

  2. #452
    ChocoTaco369's Avatar
    ChocoTaco369 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Narberth, PA
    Posts
    5,627
    Quote Originally Posted by BestBetter View Post
    I'm not saying that this COULDN'T be good advice for some people, but i am an example of how this absolutely does not work (for me). I've had YEARS of eating just about whatever I wanted, and while I never got over 125, I also never been able to lose the extra fat no matter what kind of restriction I tried, caloric or macro.

    The only way I've ever been able to lose fat is by eating VERY low fat (as in 5-10 grams per day, usually) and low carb (which was also very low calorie). This results in the top half of me looking emaciated, while the bottom half is still chubby. My body would probably rather die than give up that stubborn fat, and no amount of overeating is going to change that.

    I think we just have to face that some people are meant to be thin and lean (like SBhike's sister) and some of us are not, no matter what we do or eat. This doesn't mean we still shouldn't strive to eat healthy, but no amount of food/diet manipulation will ever result in looking good for the lucky winners in this group.
    I don't necessarily disagree with you, but I know Leida's been on starvation diets chronically since at least the George W. Bush administration, and those are just the diets I know about. God only knows what I'm unaware of. Her goal is to get defined, and she's not going to be able to do that without fixing her metabolic dysfunction so she can get anabolic. The fact that she can't gain any strength from her lifts means she either cannot attain a caloric surplus or she cannot generate any positive growth hormones, and they're both indicators of a severely downregulated and broken metabolism. The only way to fix the hormones is to assure your body that it isn't starving, and that's with a constant barrage of healthy foods and minimizing stress. Yes, it's going to result in some significant fat gain for the first couple months, but eventually when the body stats healing the fat gain will level off. In her specific, rare case, she'll have to get fat before she can get lean. At least that's what I believe. I'm doing a little of that myself.
    Don't put your trust in anyone on this forum, including me. You are the key to your own success.

  3. #453
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    981
    The "calories don't matter it's all food choices and hormones" people are just diet woo'sters.
    Now of course there's a few small things you can do to make sure everything's going ok on the CO side of the equation, like getting your health markers checked, doing the right exercises, eating whole foods, getting adequate sleep, etc. But if you're still either gaining weight or not losing the fat you want because you're eating more calories than you're expending you have a few options
    a) Hack the T cell receptors and cytokine signalling by doing one handed pushups in a Dr kruse designed cold thermogenesis suit while drinking wild red columbian ginseng tea that rearranges your chemical clock, hormone panel and leptin signalling to activate the hypothalamus and CNS
    Or
    b) Take the 400 calorie stick of butter out of your morning coffee so you have an easier time creating an energy deficit.
    Whatever sounds more practical to you.
    Last edited by Forgotmylastusername; 08-01-2012 at 11:14 PM.

  4. #454
    BestBetter's Avatar
    BestBetter is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    sunshine state
    Posts
    1,220
    Here's the thing that i still don't understand:

    We can all accept CICO.
    For some people, the CI is not so accurate, but many of us are pretty good at tracking honestly.
    However, there are some really gigantic scary monsters behind the scenes hijacking the CO part.

    So why are we wasting all this time debating the CICO, when really we should be focused on understanding, fixing, and boosting the CO part? I would like to see a thread titled something like, "The best strategies for boosting a depressed metabolism" because I think that's really what most people on here are struggling with.

  5. #455
    ChocoTaco369's Avatar
    ChocoTaco369 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Narberth, PA
    Posts
    5,627
    Quote Originally Posted by Forgotmylastusername View Post
    you have a few options
    a) Hack the T cell receptors and cytokine signalling by doing one handed pushups in a Dr kruse designed cold thermogenesis suit while drinking wild red columbian ginseng tea that rearranges your chemical clock, hormone panel and leptin signalling to activate the hypothalamus and CNS
    Or
    b) Take the 400 calorie stick of butter out of your morning coffee so you have an easier time creating an energy deficit.
    Whatever sounds practical to you.
    I love this guy <3
    Don't put your trust in anyone on this forum, including me. You are the key to your own success.

  6. #456
    ChocoTaco369's Avatar
    ChocoTaco369 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Narberth, PA
    Posts
    5,627
    Quote Originally Posted by BestBetter View Post
    Here's the thing that i still don't understand:

    We can all accept CICO.
    For some people, the CI is not so accurate, but many of us are pretty good at tracking honestly.
    However, there are some really gigantic scary monsters behind the scenes hijacking the CO part.

    So why are we wasting all this time debating the CICO, when really we should be focused on understanding, fixing, and boosting the CO part? I would like to see a thread titled something like, "The best strategies for boosting a depressed metabolism" because I think that's really what most people on here are struggling with.
    Because I'm trying to drive home that simply eating foods that don't create insulin spikes isn't going to make you lose weight. There is no metabolic advantage to a low carbohydrate diet, and calories from butter aren't going to make you lose weight faster than calories from flour. Putting 1/2 of stick of butter in your coffee isn't much different than putting 1/2 cup of sugar in your coffee. Your weight loss stalls til you burn off those calories, and people need to understand this.

    There are people with metabolic issues on this forum. However, they are the exception, not the norm. Look how far this thread has shifted away from the initial point - it has shifted because people are obsessed with bringing up rare genetic and metabolic conditions in hopes that they have some genetic reason why they have trouble losing weight that's beyond their control and "not their fault." The fact remains that the overwhelming majority of people walking the street and typing on this forum are overweight because of one reason - they eat too much food. Dropping grains, sugars and vegetable oils are great for your health, but if you're consuming 3,000 calories of steak, butter and avocado a day, you're not going to lose weight any faster than if you're consuming 3,000 calories of chicken breast, whole wheat pasta and soybean oil.

    The methods of calculating CICO available to use are not perfect, but they'll work for almost all of us. Stop focusing on the 2% of people that the equations don't apply to and focus on portion control and consistency to find out what works for you. For most, this is going to mean leaner meats, less oils for frying and overall smaller dinner plates.
    Last edited by ChocoTaco369; 08-01-2012 at 10:39 PM.
    Don't put your trust in anyone on this forum, including me. You are the key to your own success.

  7. #457
    kitoi's Avatar
    kitoi is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Fairfield, CA
    Posts
    547
    Quote Originally Posted by ChocoTaco369 View Post
    The fact remains that the overwhelming majority of people walking the street and typing on this forum are overweight because of one reason - they eat too much food. Dropping grains, sugars and vegetable oils are great for your health, but if you're consuming 3,000 calories of steak, butter and avocado a day, you're not going to lose weight any faster than if you're consuming 3,000 calories of chicken breast, whole wheat pasta and soybean oil.
    Couldn't have said it better.

  8. #458
    JoanieL's Avatar
    JoanieL is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    It's not the heat, it's the stupidity.
    Posts
    8,160
    Nah, even the grain pushers admit that low carb is a faster weight loss action given equal number of calories, than is high carb/low fat.

    I'd truly like to see how what some of the young men in this thread would look like if they had to eat only 1200 cal/day to maintain a healthy weight.

    I'm also wondering if the 2% is a real number or is it being used for hyperbole.

  9. #459
    cori93437's Avatar
    cori93437 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    central FL
    Posts
    6,715
    Quote Originally Posted by JoanieL View Post
    Nah, even the grain pushers admit that low carb is a faster weight loss action given equal number of calories, than is high carb/low fat.

    I'd truly like to see how what some of the young men in this thread would look like if they had to eat only 1200 cal/day to maintain a healthy weight.

    I'm also wondering if the 2% is a real number or is it being used for hyperbole.
    This...
    Hyperbole.

    Calorie restriction matters... but the macros matter as well.
    “You have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, the correct way, and the only way, it does not exist.”
    ~Friedrich Nietzsche
    And that's why I'm here eating HFLC Primal/Paleo.


  10. #460
    jem51's Avatar
    jem51 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    170
    Primal Blueprint Expert Certification
    I didn't read all 47 pages but it sounds like Matt Stone is being channeled.

Page 46 of 69 FirstFirst ... 36444546474856 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •