

Originally Posted by
Omni
I am trying to find some resolution in these wheat discussions that seem to go nowhere.
You say refined flower is nutritionally void and is obviusly bad food from your previous statement.
That kills off over 90% (maybe 95%+) of wheat based foods, as even most of the so called "wholegrain" products only contain the essence of whole grain.
Now you can't go on about how it's not that bad, then not have a place for it in the ideal diet structure.
The USDA has a food Pyramid that basically says 60% calories from wheat is healthy.
The Paleo/Primal food Pyramid basically says less than 1% (social) calories is acceptable consumption of wheat.
There is always going to be exceptions with food allergies etc., but for the general population, including yourself.
Mind you, your abscence of wheat consumption doesn't support the cause either,
Yes you may find a Vegan who will argue in support of a Paleo lifestyle, but the argument loses impetus if there is no personal commitment.
You have got to be able to put it somewhere in there and in what form,
Is only whole grain, heirloom varieties, low gluten, organically grown wheat acceptable as a food product and what % calories should it contribute to a healthy diet?
Without a firm commitment your argument is baseless,
i.e. Wheat is safe to eat as food, but I can't tell you how much is safe to eat.
+1
Plus
Comparison with ancestral diets suggests dense acellular carbohydrates
Eating primal is not a diet, it is a way of life.
PS
Don't forget to play!