Fair enough. If that's the definition you are using then I guess primal is low carb. I would put low carb at being <50g personally, which is something that I don't strive for.
I've read through several of the articles on Dannys blog and they don't seem that outrageous. There's useful information there.
Griff's cholesterol primer
bloodorchid: paleo and primal are not low carb
Winterbike: What I eat every day is what other people eat to treat themselves.
“The whole concept of a macronutrient, like that of a calorie, is determining our language game in such a way that the conversation is not making sense." - Dr. Kurt Harris
As I understand it he is deliberately aiming for sugar consumption to get fructose as well, because that is a better facilitator of CO2 production in the body.
That said, he does seem to be eager to point out perceived flaws in paleo since falling out of love with her. And I'm not sure that what he is saying is rock solid. For example, this is the summary from this page:
I think that the first point is just flat out incorrect (and I think he gets corrected in the comments, but has not edited the article to reflect his changed understanding since he authored it). The second one seems to be based on the idea that the closer your resting pulse rate is to 85 the better, which I am unsure of (I thought lower was better?). The 3rd, 4th and 5th points all seem perfectly reasonable, but would require someone with more understanding of the subjects in question than me to rebut them (if they should be rebutted).Originally Posted by Summary
Last edited by magicmerl; 07-03-2012 at 05:29 PM.
Griff's cholesterol primer
bloodorchid: paleo and primal are not low carb
Winterbike: What I eat every day is what other people eat to treat themselves.
@Apex,
Thanks.
@Grumpycakes,
It depends on the metabolic rate and that person's ability to produce energy in the face of stress (thyroid performance).
In general, a higher carbohydrate diet is preferable to limit adrenaline, cortisol, and the rest of the adaptive hormones.
@Joe 2.0,
Diabetes/metabolic issues are not caused by consuming sugar, they are caused by adaptive stress hormones that are released when energy production (real biological energy) is insufficient.
@Chaohinon,
Fibrous carbohydrates can cause complications with bacterial endotoxin and increase adaptive stress hormones.
Fruit sugar has a few other qualities as well; increased CO2, rich in magnesium, vitamin C, and fructose.
Good answer from @magicmerl
@magicmerl,
I didn't change it because I don't necessarily believe that the concept of "safe starches" had nothing to do with fructose content.
Last edited by dannyroddy; 07-03-2012 at 05:38 PM. Reason: spelling
Fruits are fibrous carbohydrates.
“The whole concept of a macronutrient, like that of a calorie, is determining our language game in such a way that the conversation is not making sense." - Dr. Kurt Harris
@Chaohinon,
Very ripe oranges, watermelon, grapes, cherries, etc. have lower fiber content than starches.
Also, this is why I recommend strained fresh orange juice as a carbohydrate source.
Fair enough. I've drifted to a point there I don't think that sugar is a demon once you have eliminated processed foods from your diet.
To the best of my knowledge 'safe starches' are a term coined by Paul Janimet for his 'perfect health diet' graphic. It's a way of ring fencing the bad starches while still having the macronutrient in your diet, and leaving people aware of 'unsafe' starches, particularly grains and legumes:
It seems that most of the big 'controversy' is merely a question of degree.Originally Posted by from the link
Griff's cholesterol primer
bloodorchid: paleo and primal are not low carb
Winterbike: What I eat every day is what other people eat to treat themselves.