Page 42 of 44 FirstFirst ... 324041424344 LastLast
Results 411 to 420 of 435

Thread: Christian/Creation PB followers page 42

  1. #411
    Figlio di Moros's Avatar
    Figlio di Moros is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    wNY
    Posts
    272
    Shop Now
    Quote Originally Posted by Grok View Post
    We don't know that they interbred. There is evidence to suggest they did, but it's not conclusive evidence as far as I understand.
    Yes, we do- early after h. sapien entered the middle east, in fact. 4% of DNA in Europeans and Asians are from Neanderthals.

    All I'm saying is that it would be premature to assume that we are here today because of some plan by some almighty being up in the heavens who created modern man in his own image.
    Which has nothing to do with anything I said- I asked if another member could not see a spark of divinity in man, never did I make a statement about how it got there.

    Once you assume that, then people start thinking that God is a certain race, and then you have wars over race and wars over religion.

  2. #412
    Grok's Avatar
    Grok is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    LakeRidge Golf Course
    Posts
    3,682
    Quote Originally Posted by Figlio di Moros View Post
    Which has nothing to do with anything I said- I asked if another member could not see a spark of divinity in man, never did I make a statement about how it got there.
    You said (paraphrasing) that modern humans are different than any other animal on the face of the Earth, and I called you out on it because you were only considering present day animals and not other species which are now extinct.

    There were plenty of other species which once roamed this planet with characteristics seen in modern day humans which you do not see in any other animals today.

    Just because we are the only extant species which still has these characteristics, does not in any way mean that there is a spark of divinity within us.

  3. #413
    Uncephalized's Avatar
    Uncephalized is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    1,883
    Figlio, you can equivocate all you want about what you mean by the "spark of divinity", but if what you mean is "the ability to appreciate art and beauty" or "a sense of the mystical and transcendent", or even "self-aware consciousness", then there is no evidence whatever to suggest that this is anything but a set of evolved characteristics of human brains, ultimately explicable through purely naturalistic means, even if it is not yet well-understood because it is extremely complex. If you actually mean something mystical, then there's no evidence such traits exist at all and they certainly shouldn't be used in the pursuit of a rational ethics.

    There is no scientific reason to believe that human beings are anything but a species of primate who has evolved a unique brain structure and way of living (heavily influenced by cultural inheritance, which is a key part of our success and our complexity), and become very successful because of it.

    Quote Originally Posted by Crabbcakes View Post
    This is beautiful - you write well.
    Thank you.
    Today I will: Eat food, not poison. Plan for success, not settle for failure. Live my real life, not a virtual one. Move and grow, not sit and die.

    My Primal Journal

  4. #414
    Figlio di Moros's Avatar
    Figlio di Moros is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    wNY
    Posts
    272
    Quote Originally Posted by Grok View Post
    You said (paraphrasing) that modern humans are different than any other animal on the face of the Earth, and I called you out on it because you were only considering present day animals and not other species which are now extinct. There were plenty of other species which once roamed this planet with characteristics seen in modern day humans which you do not see in any other animals today.
    Those other species were either human, or close relatives. I fail to see your point, how does other forms of sapient life change the unique nature of sapience itself?

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncephalized View Post
    Figlio, you can equivocate all you want about what you mean by the "spark of divinity", but if what you mean is "the ability to appreciate art and beauty" or "a sense of the mystical and transcendent", or even "self-aware consciousness", then there is no evidence whatever to suggest that this is anything but a set of evolved characteristics of human brains, ultimately explicable through purely naturalistic means, even if it is not yet well-understood because it is extremely complex. If you actually mean something mystical, then there's no evidence such traits exist at all and they certainly shouldn't be used in the pursuit of a rational ethics.
    In other words, "if it's natural, then there can't be anything supernatural about it; if it's supernatural, it can't be at all natural."

    Again, how's this at all relevent to anything I've said? You're assuming my position, or even the relevence of it, on the origins of this "spark" in humanity. What matters is that sapience itself provides us with something different from mere non-sapient life, the fact you choose to ignore the prospect of divinity or even the seperateness of this numen from anima doesn't really concern me.

  5. #415
    Grok's Avatar
    Grok is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    LakeRidge Golf Course
    Posts
    3,682
    Quote Originally Posted by Figlio di Moros View Post
    Those other species were either human, or close relatives. I fail to see your point, how does other forms of sapient life change the unique nature of sapience itself?
    In the middle stone age period there was very little of anything that distinguished homo sapiens from other species of the genus Homo like Neanderthals or homo erectus.

    This "unique nature of sapience" only started to occur about 50,000 BP.[1]

    [1] Behavioral modernity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  6. #416
    Figlio di Moros's Avatar
    Figlio di Moros is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    wNY
    Posts
    272
    Uh... you never did well in lit courses, did you? /facepalm

  7. #417
    pdjesson's Avatar
    pdjesson is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Burton, Staffs., UK
    Posts
    130
    Quote Originally Posted by cori93437 View Post
    Facts are facts... I obviously don't accept "I believe" as Fact...
    Things which are real and can be proven are good.
    Because a book says so... not so good.
    Science is pretty good at this sort of thing, though not infallible... which is why I'm open to believing new things when there is factual evidence... even when it debunks previously held theories.

    This about covers it...
    Fact   [fakt]
    noun
    1.
    something that actually exists; reality; truth: Your fears have no basis in fact if you are afraid of being abducted by aliens.
    2.
    something known to exist or to have happened: Space travel is now a fact.
    3.
    a truth known by actual experience or observation; something known to be true: Scientists gather facts about plant growth.
    I don't know how it can be more clear than the example of scientists gathering facts... but see #4 also.

    These two are a bit more sketchy...
    4.
    something said to be true or supposed to have happened: The facts given by the witness are highly questionable.
    This one might need some explanation...

    Some declarations of experience are easily accepted as a fact based on several things...
    (Do I know/trust this person, is the declaration of fact reasonable, could evidence of the declaration be gathered to either verify or falsify the claim)
    For instance you tell me you have a cat.
    Ok, I'll probably take that as a 'fact' of your life although you could be making it up because it's a pretty general thing
    However, why would you? Also... if I knew you personally I could gather evidence to verify or falsify the claim.
    Cat hair on clothing? Evidence of a cat at your house (food, kitty litter etc)? Actually seeing the cat at your home?
    Your family members also talking about your pet cat? And so on...
    So sure, "you have a cat"... but I don't have Faith in your cats existence in any meaningful way. It either exists in reality or it doesn't and I'm not invested in that personally.

    On the other hand someone could tell me that they have an invisible Unicorn that follows them everywhere.
    This is not a normally real thing that exists... I'm not buying it.
    Furthermore there is no evidence at all that can be gathered to either falsify or verify the existence of the Unicorn.
    There are no FACTS to support that this is indeed a real thing, and thus I do not call that a reliable statement of experience.
    I don't have Faith in your invisible Unicorn's existence because it's a ridiculous assertion. It either exists in reality or it doesn't exist.

    5.
    Law . Often, facts. an actual or alleged event or circumstance, as distinguished from its legal effect or consequence.
    And this isn't about law... although the term "alleged" may come up I suppose...
    Wow! That's what it's all about! 'We could have some fun with this.' For example, beginning with number 1:something that actually exists; reality; truth... What is the reality of your existence? What is the reality of your reality? What is the reality of truth?

    In all seriousness, I could take all of the above five points to show that Muslims have a reasonable basis for stating that what they believe are facts. This is not meant as a boast or a challenge but an indication that Muslims have nothing to 'fear' from an open and reasoned discussion of the facts. Of course, from a rational basis for belief to belief is a relatively large step.
    Last edited by pdjesson; 06-30-2012 at 05:24 PM.
    All the best!

    PDJ

    The quieter you become the more you're able to hear.

    Mawlana Jalaludin Rumi

  8. #418
    Uncephalized's Avatar
    Uncephalized is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    1,883
    Quote Originally Posted by Figlio di Moros View Post
    Those other species were either human, or close relatives. I fail to see your point, how does other forms of sapient life change the unique nature of sapience itself?

    In other words, "if it's natural, then there can't be anything supernatural about it; if it's supernatural, it can't be at all natural."

    Again, how's this at all relevent to anything I've said? You're assuming my position, or even the relevence of it, on the origins of this "spark" in humanity. What matters is that sapience itself provides us with something different from mere non-sapient life, the fact you choose to ignore the prospect of divinity or even the seperateness of this numen from anima doesn't really concern me.
    If you choose to use loaded terms like "divine", you have to expect that people will assume you mean something supernatural or mystical. And if you prefer vague platitudes to clear explanations then you can't expect anyone to telepathically grasp the nuances of your position.

    I am claiming that I don't think there is anything uniquely special about humans that make us the center of the moral universe, just to make that clear. I think we have an overdeveloped set of the same social instincts that our close genetic relatives have, as well as an evolved capacity for complex language that allows our culture to become enormously intricate. Nothing in my experience suggests that any of our traits make us candidates for any special status other than "animal most prone to invention of the Internet".
    Today I will: Eat food, not poison. Plan for success, not settle for failure. Live my real life, not a virtual one. Move and grow, not sit and die.

    My Primal Journal

  9. #419
    Rasputina's Avatar
    Rasputina is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,023
    Dear MDA posters,
    It's me, God. Um, I haven't butted-in like this in a long time, but, well, why are you bothering posting on this thread? I designed you to have sex. SEX! I, God, I am getting bored. Log-off and go have sex. My guests are getting restless, I'm beginning to think my whole God-cam was a waste. Thanks, mates.
    Cheers,
    God

  10. #420
    Crabbcakes's Avatar
    Crabbcakes is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Appalachian Ohio
    Posts
    2,349
    Quote Originally Posted by pdjesson View Post
    Of course, from a rational basis for belief to belief is a relatively large step.
    I'm glad you added that last line in your edit. With the Latter-day Saints the opening salvo is "What is Truth?". I thought I felt a "Truly thinking people become Muslims" thing slowly happening. Or perhaps I am just touchy.

Page 42 of 44 FirstFirst ... 324041424344 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •