Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 48

Thread: Low-carb diet tied to higher cholesterol page 3

  1. #21
    yodiewan's Avatar
    yodiewan is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,349
    Primal Fuel
    Quote Originally Posted by pklopp View Post
    There is nothing to rebut.

    It is well known that increasing dietary fat increases cholesterol levels. All else being equal, when a given individual increases fat consumption, that individual's cholesterol numbers will increase. If you adopt a low carb diet without changing your overall caloric intake, then you must necessarily increase your intake of proteins or fats, or far more likely, both. In so doing, you will observe the attendant increase in cholesterol levels. This is not controversial, nor does it actually provide any useful information.

    The crux of the matter is whether higher cholesterol numbers are actually indicative of anything with respect to health, and Ancel Keys not withstanding, studies show that there is a broad optimal range for cholesterol, and both very low or very high levels are representative of some underlying pathology that will impact on your health. So, what is this optimal range? Well, if your cholesterol levels are between 140 - 280 mg/dl, mortality rates from all causes are relatively flat. If you are lower than 140 mg/dl, or higher than 280 mg/dl, mortality increases sharply. So, if you present me with a study where the average participant's cholesterol levels were increased by 40 mg/dl from 180 to 220 ( say ) with the adoption of a low carbohydrate diet ... color me unimpressed.

    But, having said all of that ... you really need to read this paper to realize what a bunch of utter crap it is. I caution you, though, it is a waste of time. Here's the punchline: over the 25 years of the study, there was a steady relative shift from carbohydrate intake to fat among participants, and an overall reduction in serum cholesterol from about 6.5 mmol/L to 5.5 mmol/L. Yes, you read that right, an overall decrease in cholesterol levels. Of course, crank that result through sensationalist media outlets and it becomes "low carbohydrate diets kill."

    Nothing to see here ... move along.

    -PK
    *Applause*

    I quoted the entire reply so if anyone skips ahead in this thread they won't miss it. You hit the nail on the head. Science FTW.

  2. #22
    fiercehunter's Avatar
    fiercehunter is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    the world
    Posts
    1,940
    Well it could be that low carb damages the thyroid and the thyroid has to do with overall metabolism so sure people who eat VLC or LC have deranged cholesterol.

  3. #23
    RichMahogany's Avatar
    RichMahogany is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    7,176
    Quote Originally Posted by fiercehunter View Post
    Well it could be that low carb damages the thyroid
    It could also be that magical pixies use their fairy dust in the night to raise cholesterol levels of those who eat low carbohydrate diets.

    This would explain the super-low cholesterol levels measured in the Maasai, due to the well-documented fact that there are no cholesterol pixies in the part of Africa they inhabit.

  4. #24
    js290's Avatar
    js290 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    2,026
    Quote Originally Posted by RichMahogany View Post
    It could also be that magical pixies use their fairy dust in the night to raise cholesterol levels of those who eat low carbohydrate diets.

    This would explain the super-low cholesterol levels measured in the Maasai, due to the well-documented fact that there are no cholesterol pixies in the part of Africa they inhabit.
    LOL... people who think they have a broken thyroid should just try eating more.

  5. #25
    Apex Predator's Avatar
    Apex Predator is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,354
    Quote Originally Posted by john_e_turner_ii View Post
    That's the problem with this forum.

    If a person comes to PB diet, eats that way for a while, then gets tested and has "normal" cholesterol results, then everyone applauds and says "Good for you".

    If another person starts PB and has "high" cholesterol results, everyone says "Those numbers are great! Cholesterol is really meaningless."

    So, which is it?
    To me, it easily can be both- if someone's goal is to get their cholesterol in line with the establishment numbers, I'm happy they reached it. I don't have to agree with their goal to be happy they hit it. Personally, I don't care about my LDL at all, barely care about my HDL, and really care about my trigs, vldl and CRP. To me, TC is a red herring, so I don't worry about it. But if it makes someone else happy, more power to them.

  6. #26
    spacey47's Avatar
    spacey47 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    london
    Posts
    116
    didnt anthony Colpo nail the whole arguement in his book the 'great Cholesterol Con'?

  7. #27
    Dave RN's Avatar
    Dave RN is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Crowley TX
    Posts
    303
    Lets not forget that half if not more of heart attack victims have "normal" cholesterol.

    It's the inflammation!

  8. #28
    zoebird's Avatar
    zoebird is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    8,090
    Quote Originally Posted by icz View Post
    I don't know; i have concerns as well. While I ahave been 30 pounds overweight my whole adult life, my cholesterol has always been good -- below 200 with high good chol & low bad. Triglycerides are great. I don't need them to change, but I used to only eat meat a few times a week. . . So eating bacon etc, just gives me pause.
    Then don't eat bacon.

    My diet looks very 'conventional.' it just happens to be grain/legume free.

    For breakfast, I often eat 2-3 eggs plus some veggies or fruit (depends upon how I feel for breakfast). Sometimes it's just eggs and tea.

    For lunch, I normally don't have lunch.

    For dinner, I typically have some form of meat (chicken, fish, beef, venison) with a LOT of veggies (Big Salads, lots of steamed veggies, sometimes roasted root veggies, etc). And, I usually like to have some fruit for dessert.

    I might eat bacon 1-2 times a week, and usually 2 pieces of shoulder bacon at that. But, i prefer sausage, and now I basically make my own (using venison no less -- and I make it without casings, so it's usually just ground venison plus seasonings all browned up and tasty).

    I do have potatoes and sweet potatoes in my diet about once a week (one or the other), and I have rice about 1-2x per month (with thai food!).

    I have tea or water all day long. That's what I like to drink.

    I probably have cake or chocolate or some other non-primal thing about 1x per month or less at this point. It's just following how I feel, really. If I have nuts, it's once a week or less.

    And that is me. Honestly, it's simple as can be. And, my diet is looking rather zone-ish these days: 40% fat, 30% protein, 30% carbohydrate. And, it's great.

  9. #29
    magicmerl's Avatar
    magicmerl is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    3,121
    Yeah, I think that bacon is a bit overrated on this here forum here.

    We have soup as our go-to breakfast, largely since I have the soul of a scotsman and you can buy mutton flaps or half a pigs head for $4-5. Whereas 500g of decent bacon is $10/pk around here, and stretches for the same number of meals (about 3).
    Disclaimer: I eat 'meat and vegetables' ala Primal, although I don't agree with the carb curve. I like Perfect Health Diet and WAPF Lactofermentation a lot.

    Griff's cholesterol primer
    5,000 Cal Fat <> 5,000 Cal Carbs
    Winterbike: What I eat every day is what other people eat to treat themselves.
    TQP: I find for me that nutrition is much more important than what I do in the gym.
    bloodorchid is always right

  10. #30
    Wanderlust's Avatar
    Wanderlust is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawaii
    Posts
    808
    I'm surprised this didn't get referenced here:

    Is It Time to Retire the Low-Carb Diet Fad?
    "Go For Broke"
    Fat Kine-230/24% @ 6'2"
    Small Kine-168/9%
    Now- 200/8%
    Goal- 210/6%

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •