Let me quote you:
"I think that western society has gone way overboard with tolerance. It is a great catastrophe that humans are the only creatures on this planet that have no natural predators"
"I think it's ok up to the point where you aren't affecting anyone but once you step over that boundary and start affecting other people's liberties"
These two quotes contradict each-other...
And we do have natural predators. Other people!!! One way or another, majority of the death for Homo Sapiens is directly or indirectly because other people. I dont see any difference in a death by a faulty Toyota (used this one because it's trendy lately) or being attacked and killed by a hungry lion. The latter has a reason, but who cares of ethics? Ethic is another way of expressing tolerance or the lack of it.
Personally I think it's more of a problem the hypocrisy behind our chain-food. Raised to be killed (organic, grass fed, cage free or cornfed). We, the Paleos and PBs are concerned if it's grass-fed or corn-fed but we loose the most important aspect: Those animals are Raised for one purpose only, opposed to a free wild one that is growing on their own with only one purpose... perpetuation of their species. Denying to an animal any rights to survive is the big problem here, while acting "uhhh, uhhh, how about that one trillion part of PBS in farmed salmon...
I hope I dont sound extreme