Political & socio-economic nerd-rage thread. page 42

[kenn]

Spoken like a true Moonie.

I'm not a member of the unification church. If you deny social programming then you fail to understand the roots of public education and the goal of public education in this country.

[Rojo]

If you deny social programming then you fail to understand the roots of public education and the goal of public education in this country.

"Social programming" can take a lot of forms and nobody is free of it. We live in society so you can't just rock out with our cock out.

I'm a long way from public eduction. And I don't recall them giving me Noam Chomsky. Had to find that on my own.

[kenn]

"Social programming" can take a lot of forms and nobody is free of it. We live in society so you can't just rock out with our cock out.

I'm a long way from public eduction. And I don't recall them giving me Noam Chomsky. Had to find that on my own.

You said it didn't happen and now you're saying it does, stop speaking out of the sides of your mouth...

[Rojo]

You said it didn't happen...

When did I say this?

[kenn]

When did I say this?

troll

[lambchop]

Yeah, I just jumped straight to the list too, then I read the first paragraph of the article. Those first three items were the only things that some other newspaper could identify as being common between Obama and Romney. What a joke.

Yep, would be funny if it wasn't scary.

[Grok]

And I don't recall them giving me Noam Chomsky. Had to find that on my own.

Why should I read Noam Chomsky?

Isn't it impossible to have socialism without the use of force since socialism is antithetical to human nature?

[magicmerl]

Isn't it impossible to have socialism without the use of force since socialism is antithetical to human nature?

Only in your head.

In the real world people are frequently capable of egalatarian measures which do not directly benefit them or their relatives.

[kenn]

Only in your head.

In the real world people are frequently capable of egalatarian measures which do not directly benefit them or their relatives.

Socialism as a state policy is inherently elitist

[Grok]

Only in your head.

In the real world people are frequently capable of egalatarian measures which do not directly benefit them or their relatives.

Can you give an example?