Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: paradoxical effects: IF vs CR page

  1. #1
    marteen's Avatar
    marteen is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Arlington, Va
    Posts
    19

    paradoxical effects: IF vs CR

    Regarding: How Fasting Increases Lifespan | Mark's Daily Apple

    I decided to make this a forum thread because my thoughts go in a different direction than the comments on the actual blog post.

    The puzzling differences between calorie-restriction (CR) negatives which seem to turn into intermittent-fasting (IF) benefits are certainly intriguing. But I wonder if we're forgetting one of the main premises which separates our nutritional paradigm from CW. A calorie isn't a calorie.

    We know calories aren't calories. (Sorry elliptical machines)
    We know macronutrients aren't macronutrients (Sorry Zone)
    We know micronutrients aren't micronutrients (Sorry baby formula)
    We know foods aren't foods (Sorry CAFO beef)

    So a discussion of calorie restriction versus zero calories begs the question of what sorts of calories are being elminated? I think Gary Taubes likes to point out that when people go on traditional CW diets (e.g. Weight Watchers) they also tend to cut back on candy bars because even a misguided dieter knows that a candy bar isn't going to help anyone lose body fat.

    So you lose more muscle mass when CR than IF. Well, what are the calories in the first place? Maybe a CR protocol of mainly animal protein would look more like IF. Maybe the "magical pathway separate from caloric restriction" is ketosis. Maybe CR on low fat pasta decimates muscle mass.

    I have a hypothesis we would see differences between someone truely fasting versus someone fasting with "zero calorie" diet cokes.

    So what are the mice eating ad libitum? Effects of Intermittent Feeding Upon Growth and Life Span in Rats A "paleo mouse" food template or crap lab feed? I'm willing to bet eating nothing at all is better for mouse longevity than lab feed.

    My point is we can probably get closer to the answer if we compare apples to apples, which I believe is very difficult to do when the issue is eating a little versus not eating at all.
    Makin moves. Makin money. Makin bacon.

  2. #2
    Danielle5690's Avatar
    Danielle5690 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    New Orleans, LA
    Posts
    521
    That certainly makes sense. The way you have to eat in order to fast would lend itself to more muscle mass preservation than a "regular" diet. I could calorie restrict all day long on a CW whole-grain low-fat diet, but I sure as hell couldn't have fasted for more than 4 hours without being an utterly useless, cranky human being.

  3. #3
    Voyageur's Avatar
    Voyageur is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Litchfield, Minnesota
    Posts
    220
    .

    IF is just a tool to make CR (weight loss) easier for some poeple. Plus it has other health benefits....

    .
    There is a huge difference between talking about how to do something and getting it fucking done.

  4. #4
    sbhikes's Avatar
    sbhikes is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Santa Barbara
    Posts
    10,203
    If you practice IF without calorie restriction (i.e. your eating window comes up and you eat a full daily allotment), do you get the same longevity benefits?
    Female, 5'3", 49, Starting weight: 163lbs. Current weight: 135 (more or less).
    I can squat 180lbs, press 72.5lbs and deadlift 185lbs

  5. #5
    dboxing's Avatar
    dboxing is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    458
    Quote Originally Posted by marteen View Post
    Regarding: How Fasting Increases Lifespan | Mark's Daily Apple

    I decided to make this a forum thread because my thoughts go in a different direction than the comments on the actual blog post.

    The puzzling differences between calorie-restriction (CR) negatives which seem to turn into intermittent-fasting (IF) benefits are certainly intriguing. But I wonder if we're forgetting one of the main premises which separates our nutritional paradigm from CW. A calorie isn't a calorie.

    We know calories aren't calories. (Sorry elliptical machines)
    We know macronutrients aren't macronutrients (Sorry Zone)
    We know micronutrients aren't micronutrients (Sorry baby formula)
    We know foods aren't foods (Sorry CAFO beef)

    So a discussion of calorie restriction versus zero calories begs the question of what sorts of calories are being elminated? I think Gary Taubes likes to point out that when people go on traditional CW diets (e.g. Weight Watchers) they also tend to cut back on candy bars because even a misguided dieter knows that a candy bar isn't going to help anyone lose body fat.

    So you lose more muscle mass when CR than IF. Well, what are the calories in the first place? Maybe a CR protocol of mainly animal protein would look more like IF. Maybe the "magical pathway separate from caloric restriction" is ketosis. Maybe CR on low fat pasta decimates muscle mass.

    I have a hypothesis we would see differences between someone truely fasting versus someone fasting with "zero calorie" diet cokes.

    So what are the mice eating ad libitum? Effects of Intermittent Feeding Upon Growth and Life Span in Rats A "paleo mouse" food template or crap lab feed? I'm willing to bet eating nothing at all is better for mouse longevity than lab feed.

    My point is we can probably get closer to the answer if we compare apples to apples, which I believe is very difficult to do when the issue is eating a little versus not eating at all.
    I disagree with what you state as what "we know". Calories are in fact calories. Carlories, at the same time, may have different/multiple effects. Further, no food is absolutely distingushable from some food.

  6. #6
    fiercehunter's Avatar
    fiercehunter is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    the world
    Posts
    1,940
    Primal Blueprint Expert Certification
    I think ketosis has something to do with it. Fasting triggers a lot of biochemical processes that CR can't. Or so I've read.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •