
Originally Posted by
captaineight
I sort-of liked your response up until the last sentence. I didn't like that bit much.
As far as the "duh" bit goes ... if I could give you a dollar for everytime someone on this forum tried to argue that it's not calories, it's carbs (or hormones, or whatever), you'd be a rich man. I'm glad you find it obvious, as do I. That is not true for many posters here.
What's more, it's simply not true that its the "ONLY" way humans can control their own caloric intake long term. Loads of people have been able to lose weight, and keep it off long term without ever having heard of paleo. This may sound a little silly, but it's true: your stomach stretches the more you eat. The more you eat, the more you need to eat to fill that stretched out stomach. This is the real reason overweight people feel hungry all the time. It's not "crazy hormones" like the pseudo-scientists would have you believe. The fantastic news is, the less you eat, the less you want to eat. Your stomach contracts too. By keeping meals small, you can train yourself to be "less hungry".
I'm getting side-tracked though. I do agree with you that it is an excellent method to control the satiety mechanism to some extent. However, if you're a person who is struggling with their weight, you're never going to reach that ideal physique if you don't do some serious calorie counting and gym work to achieve your goals. Just blindly eating paleo without a thought for calories, or assuming pale will "naturally regulate" you into a ripped, muscular physique, is wishful thinking. It might help you shift a bit of weight when you start, or maybe a lot of weight (depending on where you started), but there will come a point you have to get a bit more strict than "just eat paleo foods".