Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: What about famines? page

  1. #1
    Dualhammers's Avatar
    Dualhammers is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    187

    1

    Shop Now


    I am all for the primal diet - I've been loving it so far. My only worry is the same that has been put out by vegetarians for a long time: that raising animals requires lots of plant matter that could directly feed a great many people.


    Is it that following the primal diet becomes a luxury of the 1st world? Could it be that by raising so much meat we are denying other human beings from food to live? Is there any data to prove or disprove this reality? Do any other Grokkers here share my fears, or do you think that non Americans/Westerners should just suck it up and deal?


  2. #2
    dfast's Avatar
    dfast is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    London / Brighton, UK
    Posts
    79

    1



    This doesn't address your question directly but may help ease some concerns:


    http://www.marksdailyapple.com/primal-lifestyle-good-for-environment/


    Basically, the way I see it is that yes, there are people starving all over the world. That's not because the animals we raise for meat are consuming too much food matter - it's because there are just too many people. Do the best that you can; buy local and organic and donate to one of the many fantastic charities aiming to help those in need.


  3. #3
    glorth2's Avatar
    glorth2 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Bucks County, PA
    Posts
    366

    1



    The bottom line answer is yes, of course. All things being equal, we could raise lots less meat animals and use the space, ostensibly, to feed more of the world's population but globalism has really only become a reality in the past few decades and the same could be said about our own reproduction. Neither is realistically going to happen. My opinion is that buying local, humanely raised animal meat is the one of the best things you can do for the planet while still giving your body what it needs AND what you want to eat.


  4. #4
    Acmebike's Avatar
    Acmebike is offline Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    90

    1



    This is a bit of a fallacy. Free-ranging pasture raised animals can (and are) be raised with less damage to the environment, and a high yield. Read "The Vegetarian Myth", and look into Joel Salatin's work at PolyFace Farm. In my locale, the terrain, soil and climate provide for millions of cattle (formerly bison) to be grown and harvested annually with zero input of supplemental feed, irrigation, pesticides, fertilizer and the like.


    Agriculture as we know it (the Green Revolution, mutant grain strains developed, increased dependance on petroleum, fertilizers, modern irrigation techniques etc) are precisely why we humans have overpopulated the earth, created dependancy and starvation, and taken many places on earth past the point of no return.


    I do feel lucky to have been born here and able to live the Primal/Paleo way, and hopefully many generations behind me will be able to do as well. Lucky that buying local here means a rich array of wild/pasture raised animal food is available, and the human population is small.


    There is no doubt the world would do better with a bit of a die off of humans. Seems our human carrying capacity is a full 33% to 50% past reality. More grains grown will help nothing, but only further the problem.


  5. #5
    stevehtcyl's Avatar
    stevehtcyl is offline Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland
    Posts
    55

    1



    Just a thought but maybe we should be growing/creating less calories? Perhaps then we wouldn't be so overpopulated because people aren't going to want to bring kids into the world if they know they wont be able to feed them.


    On a completely different note the UK has a massive problem of underage mums and dads I think more education and less access to food would certainly make a dent in that problem, something akin to an updated world war 2 rationing system.


  6. #6
    Grumpycakes's Avatar
    Grumpycakes is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    3,593

    1

    [quote]

    My only worry is the same that has been put out by vegetarians for a long time: that raising animals requires lots of plant matter that could directly feed a great many people. </blockquote>


    Who eats grass? No humans I know of.


    If we got everyone in the world to practise IF, things would work out fine.

    You lousy kids! Get off my savannah!

  7. #7
    fuhcq2's Avatar
    fuhcq2 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6

    1



    That argument is not valid if you apply it to pasture/ grazing/grass fed cows....Grass keeps growing you don&#39;t have to replant it....However, conventionally raised meats are few grains and soy. Which have to be replanted and transported(wasting gas) in order to get to the cows....rather than just letting the cows hang out in a field near a stream. Plus if you obtain most of your calories from meat you are eating less. A huge salad might have 100 calories. A pile of rice my ight have 200-300 depending on the size... same with protein. Carbohydrates and proteins contain 4 calories per gram while fats contain 9. So if you get energy from fat you can literally cut out half the mass of food....


    let me know if I am wrong...but thats how i see it. And i personally thrive on the paleo diet....


  8. #8
    glorth2's Avatar
    glorth2 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Bucks County, PA
    Posts
    366

    1



    Dual, in order for your hypothesis to work out we would have to stop growing meat altogether and use all the land to raise fruit, vegetables and, yes, grain. That said, the world doesn&#39;t work that way and something else would go wrong if we did that. Cows are simply SUPPOSED to eat grass. Grain fed is an accident of the first world.


  9. #9
    NorthernMonkeyGirl's Avatar
    NorthernMonkeyGirl is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,563

    1



    If we got rid of the animals, what would fertilise the soil? What would eat the weeds that we couldn&#39;t? What could we grow on near-vertical mountainsides? Also, do you wear wool or leather?


    No vegetarian has answered those questions for me yet


    Brownie points for asking though - I seriously believe we all need to think about these kinds of things!


  10. #10
    Dualhammers's Avatar
    Dualhammers is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    187

    1



    Thanks for all the thoughtful responses. I am not really suggesting we should stop raising animals for meat, but I was more thinking about how we in the 1st world take our birth for granted. It&#39;s easy to say "Well the world would do with 30% less people" when you are living in a nice house with plenty of food, and it is a whole other thing to say that when you are one of the poorest of the poor, or to honestly suggest contributing to that.


    For me, it is really about asking the question - is what I am doing making the world a better place for not just me? I think we forget to do that a whole heck of a lot when we view the poor and marginalized as a statistic.


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •