
1
..and my cholesterol is very high! First time in my life.
I've NEVER had problems in this area, I am not overweight, it does not run in the family...
I can only attribute it to this 'diet'. Yes, I am failry strict, but eating more meat that I used to.
think I am going back to just fish, and retain some pricipals, but I see that this much meat/bacon/saturated fat really can't be that good for you.
I have no other idea why this could be?

1
KXS,
If you don't mind posting the actual numbers, there are some folks here who can help you interpret them.
Maybe it's not as bad as you think ;)

1
OkI have the labwork at home...and I will post tomorrow/tonight.
I was really surprised. Otherwise I feel great.

1
Cool, thanks. Don't panic :D

1
High cholesterol is not bad. Depends on the numbers and where each one is. Unfortunately, most physicals don't do the NMR profile which gives you the important information. Hopefully when you post the numbers they're included but I doubt they will be. Usually it has to be specifically requested, and usually when it is requested it is met with a blank stare.
I know Rickard's site (free the animal) has done extensive posting on this topic, and Dr. Davis (heartscanblog) has as well.

1
Here is a link from my bookmarks that I have renamed as cholesterol 101 :P Look up Griffiths posts!
http://www.marksdailyapple.com/forum...ncernorpanic
hope it helps!

1
Ok here are the numbers
CHOL fasting 286/mg/dl
HDL fasting 134
triglcerides 41
Direct LDL 129
Chol HDL 2.1
what is going on here? 286 seems very high? and it was normal/low before 'primal'

1
Wow, your HDL is really high and your Trigs really low, exactly how it should be. LDL is usually calculated and not measured. One is the Friedwald formula, which I believe is generally used by labs, and the other is the Iranian Formula which gives a better estimate for people on low carb diets. When I plugged in your values, your LDL value using the latter formula turned out to be 102. I'm sure Griff can explain the ratios better.
http://homepages.slingshot.co.nz/~geoff36/LDL_mg.htm

1
Your HDL being that high is *wonderful.* Don't worry about the total number  with an HDL like that, you're in great shape. Here's something most doctors won't tell you: the ratios are more important than the actual numbers.
As maba said, if your LDL was calculated, not measured, the calculation (known as the Friedewald equation) doesn't work when trigs are under 100, as yours are. It overestimates LDL. Since your list says "Direct LDL" I am going to assume that your LDL was directly measured and not calculated, but just for reference, here's what would happen if it was calculated:
The formula used to calculate total cholesterol is: LDL + HDL + [Trigs/5] = total. But what they usually do is calculate your LDL. They measure your HDL, your Trigs and your Total  so the equation becomes: Total  (HDL + [Trigs/5]) = LDL.
This calculation works fine for trigs over 100. But when your trigs drop below 100, it becomes misleading and usually calculates your LDL far higher than it should be. Always, always demand a VAP test, which is a direct measurement of the LDL. According to Dr. Mary Vernon, "These labs in which the LDL is calculated are not accurate if your triglycerides are below 100... The equation used to calculate these numbers makes assumptions which are not accurate when triglycerides are low." (from http://www.livinlavidalowcarb.blogsp...tresults.html).
Now, about those ratios.
The ideal ratio of Total/HDL is 4.4 for women and 5 for men. Also, according to http://wwww.yourmedicaldetective.com/public/532.cfm and several other sites, the ratio of your trigs to your HDL will indicate whether your LDL is small and dense (bad) or large and fluffy (neutral). A larger number indicates smaller LDL particles and a smaller number indicates larger LDL particles. It's an inverse relationship.
Your Total/HDL ratio is 286/134, or 2.1. That's fantastic.
The ideal ratio of Trig/HDL is 2 or below. 4 is high. 6 is "danger!!" Yours is 41/134, or 0.31  that's not just fantastic, that's incredible. It's one of the best I've ever seen.
Additionally, a low ratio of Trig/HDL is great because it's a semireliable indicator of lower free insulin levels. Lower free insulin is good. However, this doesn't appear to work for those of African descent, so take that with a grain of salt.
Also see: http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/w...kingthemyth/ for more information.

1
WOW thank you SO much for these detailed and informative replies...I'll be sure to check out those links also.
I was SO discouraged when I saw the numbers and the so called 'normal' range, and the Drs recommendation to eat less fat/saturated fat. Previously I had not been eating hardly any meat at all (I mean, like 3x/year at most!) and was afraid this shift caused the numbers...so glad to hear that this is all good!
as I was shocked by this. THANKS!
Posting Permissions
 You may not post new threads
 You may not post replies
 You may not post attachments
 You may not edit your posts

Forum Rules